• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下锁骨下与腋路臂丛神经阻滞:一项随机临床研究。

Ultrasound-guided costoclavicular vs. axillary brachial plexus block: A randomized clinical study.

作者信息

Nalini Kadirehally Bheemanna, Bevinaguddaiah Yatish, Thiyagarajan Balaji, Shivasankar Archana, Pujari Vinayak Seenappa

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology, M S Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct-Dec;37(4):655-660. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_43_20. Epub 2021 Nov 2.

DOI:10.4103/joacp.JOACP_43_20
PMID:35340944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8944354/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Brachial plexus is in a very compact state at the costoclavicular space (CCS) when compared to the axilla, where the individual nerves are separate. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that brachial plexus block (BPB) at the CCS would result in a faster onset of block as compared to the axillary approach of BPB.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty patients who underwent surgeries below the level of mid-arm under ultrasound-guided BPB were randomly allocated to any one of the two study groups. Thirty milliliters of local anesthetic (LA), a mixture of 10-mL 2% lidocaine with 5-μg/mL adrenaline and 20-mL 0.5% bupivacaine, was deposited around the axillary artery (25-mL LA) and the musculocutaneous nerve (5-mL LA) or at the CCS, and performance time was noted. Observer blinded to the block procedure recorded the block onset time and success rate.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) onset times were comparable between the costoclavicular (CC) and axillary (AX) groups (12.0 ± 3.2 vs. 11.2 ± 2.9 min, respectively; = 0.367). Group CC demonstrated a reduction in performance time compared to group AX (5.3 ± 1.9 vs. 8.0 ± 3 min, respectively; < 0.05). All blocks were successful in both groups without any complications except for one patient in group AX who required a rescue block for radial nerve.

CONCLUSION

Costoclavicular and axillary ultrasound-guided BPBs resulted in similar onset times. However, the block performance time was longer for AX group compared to CC group. There were no intergroup differences found in terms of success rates.

摘要

背景与目的

与腋部(此处各神经相互分离)相比,臂丛神经在锁胸间隙(CCS)处于非常紧密的状态。本研究旨在验证以下假设:与腋路臂丛神经阻滞(BPB)相比,在CCS进行臂丛神经阻滞(BPB)会导致阻滞起效更快。

材料与方法

50例接受超声引导下BPB且手术部位在臂中部以下的患者被随机分配至两个研究组中的任意一组。将30毫升局部麻醉药(LA),即10毫升2%利多卡因与5微克/毫升肾上腺素的混合物以及20毫升0.5%布比卡因,注射在腋动脉周围(25毫升LA)和肌皮神经周围(5毫升LA)或CCS处,并记录操作时间。对阻滞操作不知情的观察者记录阻滞起效时间和成功率。

结果

锁胸(CC)组和腋路(AX)组的平均(标准差)起效时间相当(分别为12.0±3.2分钟和11.2±2.9分钟;P = 0.367)。与AX组相比,CC组的操作时间缩短(分别为5.3±1.9分钟和8.0±3分钟;P<0.05)。两组所有阻滞均成功,无任何并发症,除AX组有1例患者桡神经需要补救阻滞。

结论

锁胸和腋路超声引导下的BPB起效时间相似。然而,AX组的阻滞操作时间比CC组长。在成功率方面未发现组间差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daf9/8944354/114333367e4f/JOACP-37-655-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daf9/8944354/ae1b64582e7b/JOACP-37-655-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daf9/8944354/ef7587660bcd/JOACP-37-655-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daf9/8944354/85e4a1a751fe/JOACP-37-655-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daf9/8944354/451d356cb913/JOACP-37-655-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daf9/8944354/114333367e4f/JOACP-37-655-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daf9/8944354/ae1b64582e7b/JOACP-37-655-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daf9/8944354/ef7587660bcd/JOACP-37-655-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daf9/8944354/85e4a1a751fe/JOACP-37-655-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daf9/8944354/451d356cb913/JOACP-37-655-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daf9/8944354/114333367e4f/JOACP-37-655-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Ultrasound-guided costoclavicular vs. axillary brachial plexus block: A randomized clinical study.超声引导下锁骨下与腋路臂丛神经阻滞:一项随机临床研究。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct-Dec;37(4):655-660. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_43_20. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
2
A randomized comparison between costoclavicular and paracoracoid ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block for upper limb surgery.锁骨下与肋锁突下入路超声引导锁骨下臂丛阻滞用于上肢手术的随机对照比较。
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jun;64(6):617-625. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0842-z. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
3
Ultrasound-Guided Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Sonoanatomy, Technique, and Block Dynamics.超声引导锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞:超声解剖、技术和阻滞动力学。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):233-240. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000566.
4
Single- versus double-injection costoclavicular block: a randomized comparison.单次与双次注射锁骨下肌间沟阻滞:一项随机比较。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Mar;45(3):209-213. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101167. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
5
A Comparison of Anesthetic Quality between Single and Septum-based Double Injection for Ultrasound-Guided Costoclavicular Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导锁骨下径路肋锁间隙阻滞中单点与两点注射局麻药的麻醉质量比较:一项随机对照试验。
Pain Physician. 2022 Nov;25(8):E1183-E1189.
6
Comparison of ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgery: a propensity score matched retrospective cohort study.超声引导锁骨下入路与锁骨上入路臂丛神经阻滞用于上肢手术的比较:倾向评分匹配回顾性队列研究。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;10(1):454-461. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-2376. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
7
Comparison of the efficacy of costoclavicular space brachial plexus blockade with 0.5% versus 0.375% ropivacaine: a randomized, double-blind, single-centre, noninferiority clinical trial.比较 0.5%与 0.375%罗哌卡因用于锁骨下入路臂丛阻滞的效果:一项随机、双盲、单中心、非劣效性临床试验。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Jan;70(1):106-115. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02327-9. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
8
Axillary approach versus the infraclavicular approach in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: comparison of anesthetic time.腋路与锁骨下入路超声引导臂丛神经阻滞的比较:麻醉时间的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 Jul;61(1):12-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.1.12. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
9
A prospective, randomized comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block.血管周围与神经周围超声引导腋路臂丛神经阻滞的前瞻性随机比较。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;37(5):473-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182576b6f.
10
Efficacy of a single injection compared with triple injections using a costoclavicular approach for infraclavicular brachial plexus block during forearm and hand surgery: A randomized controlled trial.在前臂和手部手术中,采用锁骨下臂丛阻滞的肋锁入路时,单次注射与三次注射的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22739. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022739.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the clinical features of lateral and medial approaches of costoclavicular technique versus traditional lateral sagittal technique as infraclavicular brachial plexus block methods: a randomized controlled trial.比较锁骨下入路的外侧和内侧途径与传统外侧矢状途径作为锁骨下臂丛阻滞方法的临床特征:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jul 25;24(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02645-z.
2
Infraclavicular versus costoclavicular approaches to ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: a systematic review and meta-analysis.锁骨下入路与肋锁入路在超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2024 Mar-Apr;74(2):744465. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Minimum Effective Volume of Lidocaine for Ultrasound-Guided Costoclavicular Block.超声引导锁骨下入路局部麻醉药的最小有效容量。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Sep/Oct;42(5):571-574. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000629.
2
A randomized comparison between costoclavicular and paracoracoid ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block for upper limb surgery.锁骨下与肋锁突下入路超声引导锁骨下臂丛阻滞用于上肢手术的随机对照比较。
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jun;64(6):617-625. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0842-z. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
3
Ultrasound-Guided Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Sonoanatomy, Technique, and Block Dynamics.
Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis after costoclavicular approach versus other brachial plexus blocks in upper limb surgery: a meta-analysis.
锁骨下入路与其他臂丛神经阻滞在上肢手术中导致的膈肌麻痹:一项荟萃分析。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2023 Oct;76(5):442-450. doi: 10.4097/kja.22718. Epub 2023 May 2.
超声引导锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞:超声解剖、技术和阻滞动力学。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):233-240. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000566.
4
Anatomic Basis for Brachial Plexus Block at the Costoclavicular Space: A Cadaver Anatomic Study.锁骨下间隙臂丛神经阻滞的解剖学基础:一项尸体解剖研究
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):387-91. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000393.
5
Randomized Comparison of Extrafascial Versus Subfascial Injection of Local Anesthetic During Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block.超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞时筋膜外与筋膜下注射局部麻醉药的随机对照研究
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):337-43. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000264.
6
Benefits of the costoclavicular space for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: description of a costoclavicular approach.锁骨下间隙在超声引导下锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞中的优势:锁骨下途径的描述
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 May-Jun;40(3):287-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000232.
7
Ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block.超声引导下腋路臂丛神经阻滞
Med Ultrason. 2014 Sep;16(3):246-51. doi: 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.163.2kks.
8
Ultrasound anatomy of the brachial plexus nerves in the neurovascular bundle at the axilla in patients undergoing upper-extremity block anesthesia.腋部神经血管束中行上肢阻滞麻醉患者臂丛神经的超声解剖
Skeletal Radiol. 2013 May;42(5):707-13. doi: 10.1007/s00256-013-1578-7. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
9
A prospective, randomized comparison between double-, triple-, and quadruple-injection ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block.前瞻性、随机对照研究三种不同剂量局麻药在超声引导下腋路臂丛神经阻滞的效果。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 May-Jun;37(3):248-53. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31824611bf.
10
Comparison of a single- or double-injection technique for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block: a prospective, randomized, blinded controlled study.超声引导锁骨上阻滞中单点或两点注射技术的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、盲法对照研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;37(1):55-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182367b97.