• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中输卵管周围浸润与T10单节段椎旁阻滞的比较

Comparison of peritubal infiltration and single level T10 paravertebral block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

作者信息

Shankar K, Rangalakshmi Srinivasan, Priyanka D, Kailash P, Deepak Vijaykumar Kadlimatti

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Kambipura, Mysore Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct-Dec;37(4):586-591. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_64_20. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

DOI:10.4103/joacp.JOACP_64_20
PMID:35340975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8944380/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), distension of renal capsule, pelvicalyceal system and nephrostomy tube causes intense postoperative pain. The present study was done to compare the efficacy of peritubal infiltration of Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine and ultrasound guided single level T10 paravertebral block for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing PCNL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective, double blind study was conducted on 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II patients of either gender between 18-65 years undergoing PCNL who were randomized into 3 groups. Group PV [ = 20] received paravertebral block at T 10 level with 20 ml of 0.25% Ropivacaine plus 0.25 mcg/kg Dexmedetomidine. Group PT [ = 20] received peritubal infiltration along nephrostomy tube with 20 ml of 0.25% Ropivacaine plus 0.25 mcg/kg Dexmedetomidine. Group C [ = 20] control group received intravenous Tramadol 1mg/kg. Postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption and side effects if any were recorded for 24 hrs. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA test, Chi-square test. value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Demographic data were comparable. Reduced dynamic VAS score was noted for first 8hrs in peritubal infiltration compared to paravertebral group. Dynamic VAS scores were significantly lower in paravertebral group at 8, 12 and 24 hr as compared to peritubal infiltration ( < 0.05). During all time intervals peritubal infiltration and paravertebral group had significantly lower VAS scores as compared to control group. Opioid requirement was more in control group compared to study groups.

CONCLUSION

In PCNL, peritubal infiltration and single level paravertebral block produces effective postoperative analgesia without significant side effects.

摘要

背景与目的

在经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中,肾包膜、肾盂肾盏系统和肾造瘘管的扩张会导致术后剧痛。本研究旨在比较罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定的肾周浸润与超声引导下T10单节段椎旁阻滞用于PCNL患者术后镇痛的效果。

材料与方法

对60例年龄在18至65岁之间、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I级和II级、接受PCNL的患者进行了一项前瞻性双盲研究,这些患者被随机分为3组。PV组[ = 20]接受T10节段椎旁阻滞,注射20 ml 0.25%罗哌卡因加0.25 mcg/kg右美托咪定。PT组[ = 20]沿肾造瘘管进行肾周浸润,注射20 ml 0.25%罗哌卡因加0.25 mcg/kg右美托咪定。C组[ = 20]为对照组,静脉注射曲马多1mg/kg。记录术后24小时的疼痛评分、阿片类药物用量及任何副作用。采用方差分析、卡方检验进行统计学分析。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

人口统计学数据具有可比性。与椎旁阻滞组相比,肾周浸润组在最初8小时的动态视觉模拟评分(VAS)降低。与肾周浸润组相比,椎旁阻滞组在8、12和24小时的动态VAS评分显著更低(P < 0.05)。在所有时间段内,肾周浸润组和椎旁阻滞组的VAS评分均显著低于对照组。与研究组相比,对照组的阿片类药物需求量更大。

结论

在PCNL中,肾周浸润和单节段椎旁阻滞可产生有效的术后镇痛,且无明显副作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/ebcd2868a3d9/JOACP-37-586-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/a044aaa79a9a/JOACP-37-586-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/7a005b6e214a/JOACP-37-586-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/21e43582181b/JOACP-37-586-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/d2b67f4d3ead/JOACP-37-586-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/fd4f04e60009/JOACP-37-586-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/a555ac60ff74/JOACP-37-586-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/ebcd2868a3d9/JOACP-37-586-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/a044aaa79a9a/JOACP-37-586-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/7a005b6e214a/JOACP-37-586-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/21e43582181b/JOACP-37-586-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/d2b67f4d3ead/JOACP-37-586-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/fd4f04e60009/JOACP-37-586-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/a555ac60ff74/JOACP-37-586-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c88/8944380/ebcd2868a3d9/JOACP-37-586-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of peritubal infiltration and single level T10 paravertebral block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中输卵管周围浸润与T10单节段椎旁阻滞的比较
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct-Dec;37(4):586-591. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_64_20. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
2
Ultrasound-guided low thoracic paravertebral block versus peritubal infiltration for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized study.超声引导下胸腰椎旁阻滞与经皮肾镜取石术围手术期输卵管周围浸润麻醉的前瞻性随机研究。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Jun;48(3):235-244. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-01106-w. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
3
A comparison of the efficacy of intercostal nerve block and peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine for post-operative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective randomised double-blind study.罗哌卡因肋间神经阻滞与输卵管周围浸润用于经皮肾镜取石术后镇痛效果的比较:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Aug;61(8):655-660. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_88_17.
4
Peritubal Infiltration of Fentanyl Compared to Dexmedetomidine with Ropivacaine in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Comparative Analysis.在经皮肾镜取石术中,芬太尼与右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因在输卵管周围浸润的比较:一项随机对照分析。
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Jan-Mar;13(1):1-6. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_1_19.
5
Ultrasound guided peritubal infiltration of 0.25% ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.超声引导下0.25%罗哌卡因行输卵管周围浸润用于经皮肾镜取石术后镇痛
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Jun;22(2):149-54.
6
Ultrasound guided peritubal infiltration of 0.25% Bupivacaine versus 0.25% Ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective double blind randomized study.超声引导下0.25%布比卡因与0.25%罗哌卡因用于经皮肾镜取石术后疼痛缓解的输卵管周围浸润:一项前瞻性双盲随机研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2014 May;58(3):293-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.135040.
7
Role of buprenorphine in prolonging the duration of post-operative analgesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Comparison between bupivacaine versus bupivacaine and buprenorphine combination.丁丙诺啡在延长经皮肾镜取石术后镇痛持续时间中的作用:布比卡因与布比卡因联合丁丙诺啡的比较
Indian J Urol. 2015 Apr-Jun;31(2):132-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.152815.
8
Efficacy of peritubal local anesthetic infiltration in alleviating postoperative pain in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.输卵管周围局部麻醉药浸润对减轻经皮肾镜取石术后疼痛的疗效。
J Endourol. 2009 May;23(5):857-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0634.
9
Analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine versus ropivacaine and morphine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonic guidance.超声引导下经皮肾镜取石术中罗哌卡因与罗哌卡因联合吗啡输卵管周围浸润的镇痛效果
Saudi J Anaesth. 2013 Apr;7(2):118-21. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.114046.
10
Comparison of the efficacy of erector spinae plane block and peritubal infiltration of levobupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.竖脊肌平面阻滞与左旋布比卡因输卵管周围浸润用于经皮肾镜取石术后镇痛的效果比较
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct-Dec;37(4):574-579. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_430_19. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of different regional anaesthesia techniques on postoperative analgesia following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同区域麻醉技术对经皮肾镜取石术后镇痛的影响:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Jan;69(1):12-22. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_679_24. Epub 2025 Jan 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Peritubal Infiltration of Fentanyl Compared to Dexmedetomidine with Ropivacaine in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Comparative Analysis.在经皮肾镜取石术中,芬太尼与右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因在输卵管周围浸润的比较:一项随机对照分析。
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Jan-Mar;13(1):1-6. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_1_19.
2
Ultrasound-guided low thoracic paravertebral block versus peritubal infiltration for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized study.超声引导下胸腰椎旁阻滞与经皮肾镜取石术围手术期输卵管周围浸润麻醉的前瞻性随机研究。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Jun;48(3):235-244. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-01106-w. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
3
Paravertebral block for surgical anesthesia of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Care-compliant 3 case reports.
椎旁阻滞用于经皮肾镜取石术的手术麻醉:符合护理规范的3例病例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(28):e4156. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004156.
4
Paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural for patients undergoing thoracotomy.开胸手术患者的椎旁阻滞与胸段硬膜外阻滞比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 21;2(2):CD009121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009121.pub2.
5
Different Approaches to Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block: An Illustrated Review.超声引导胸椎旁神经阻滞的不同方法:图示综述。
Anesthesiology. 2015 Aug;123(2):459-74. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000747.
6
[Adding 75 mg pregabalin to analgesic regimen reduces pain scores and opioid consumption in adults following percutaneous nephrolithotomy].[在镇痛方案中添加75毫克普瑞巴林可降低经皮肾镜取石术后成人的疼痛评分并减少阿片类药物的使用量]
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2014 Sep-Oct;64(5):335-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2013.08.001. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
7
Analgesic efficacy of paravertebral bupivacaine during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an observer blinded, randomized controlled trial.经皮肾镜取石术中椎旁布比卡因的镇痛效果:一项观察者盲法、随机对照试验
J Endourol. 2014 Sep;28(9):1085-90. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0179. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
8
Thoracic paravertebral block for nephrectomy: a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded study.胸腔旁神经阻滞用于肾切除术:一项随机、对照、观察者盲法研究。
Pain Med. 2014 May;15(5):850-6. doi: 10.1111/pme.12320. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
9
Ultrasound guided peritubal infiltration of 0.25% ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.超声引导下0.25%罗哌卡因行输卵管周围浸润用于经皮肾镜取石术后镇痛
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Jun;22(2):149-54.
10
Effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block on postoperative pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy : prospective randomized controlled study.超声引导下肋间神经阻滞对经皮肾镜取石术后疼痛的影响:前瞻性随机对照研究
Anaesthesist. 2013 Dec;62(12):988-94. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2253-z. Epub 2013 Nov 1.