• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2008-2020 年筛查发现的导管原位癌:一项观察性研究。

Screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ, 2008-2020: An observational study.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, 8797University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Public Health HSE North East, Navan, Ireland.

出版信息

J Med Screen. 2022 Sep;29(3):172-177. doi: 10.1177/09691413221090739. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1177/09691413221090739
PMID:35341364
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the grade distribution of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed in Ireland, in the context of the clinical trials currently underway to determine if active surveillance is a feasible management option for low-risk DCIS.

SETTING

BreastCheck is the national breast screening programme in Ireland, offering screening to women aged 50 to 69 every two years.

METHODS

This study was a secondary analysis of data collected by BreastCheck on all screen-detected DCIS diagnosed in the 12 years of nationwide screening. Incidence and detection rates were calculated. Descriptive analysis of the cases was performed and, for comparative analysis, grade of DCIS was analysed as a binary variable (high vs. low/intermediate) in keeping with the inclusion criteria for active surveillance trials. Analysis was performed in IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 26.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2020, 2240 women were diagnosed with DCIS through BreastCheck; 876 (39.1%) were low/intermediate-grade. The overall incidence rate has remained relatively stable during this period. Women with low/intermediate-grade DCIS were younger than women with high-grade DCIS (56 (interquartile range: 56-61) years v 57 (interquartile range: 53-61) years; p < 0.001). They were also more likely to have been diagnosed at an initial screening episode compared with those who had high-grade lesions (42.5% v 29.0%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

If current clinical trials recommend active surveillance as a feasible option for DCIS, up to 40% of women with screen-detected DCIS may be eligible. These women are younger and often diagnosed on initial screening episode, so may require longer active follow-up.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估爱尔兰通过筛查检出的导管原位癌(DCIS)的分级分布情况,以期为目前正在进行的临床试验提供参考,这些临床试验旨在确定主动监测是否是低危 DCIS 的可行管理选择。

背景

BreastCheck 是爱尔兰的国家乳房筛查计划,为 50 至 69 岁的女性每两年提供一次筛查。

方法

本研究对 BreastCheck 在全国范围内筛查的 12 年间发现的所有经筛查检出的 DCIS 病例进行了二次分析。计算了发病率和检出率。对病例进行了描述性分析,并根据纳入主动监测试验的标准,将 DCIS 的分级作为二分类变量(高 vs. 低/中)进行了比较分析。采用 IBM SPSS Statistics 26 版进行分析。

结果

2008 年至 2020 年间,2240 名女性通过 BreastCheck 被诊断为 DCIS,其中 876 名(39.1%)为低/中级别。在此期间,总体发病率一直保持相对稳定。与高级别 DCIS 患者相比,低/中级别 DCIS 患者年龄更小(56(四分位距:56-61)岁比 57(四分位距:53-61)岁;p<0.001)。与高级别病变患者相比,这些患者更有可能在初次筛查时被诊断出(42.5%比 29.0%;p<0.001)。

结论

如果当前的临床试验建议主动监测是 DCIS 的可行选择,那么多达 40%的经筛查检出的 DCIS 患者可能符合条件。这些女性年龄较小,且往往在初次筛查时被诊断出,因此可能需要更长时间的主动随访。

相似文献

1
Screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ, 2008-2020: An observational study.2008-2020 年筛查发现的导管原位癌:一项观察性研究。
J Med Screen. 2022 Sep;29(3):172-177. doi: 10.1177/09691413221090739. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
2
Trends in detection of invasive cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ at biennial screening mammography in Spain: a retrospective cohort study.西班牙两年一次的筛查性乳房 X 光检查中浸润性癌和导管原位癌检出率的变化趋势:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 23;8(12):e83121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083121. eCollection 2013.
3
Screen detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent incidence of invasive interval breast cancers: a retrospective population-based study.导管原位癌的筛查检测及随后发生的浸润性间隔期乳腺癌:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jan;17(1):109-14. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00446-5. Epub 2015 Dec 5.
4
The distribution of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) grade in 4232 women and its impact on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening.4232名女性原位导管癌(DCIS)分级的分布及其对乳腺癌筛查中过度诊断的影响。
Breast Cancer Res. 2016 May 10;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0705-5.
5
Trends in incidence and tumour grade in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.筛查检出的导管原位癌和浸润性乳腺癌发病趋势及肿瘤分级。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Nov;166(1):307-314. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4412-4. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
6
Low-grade screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ progresses more slowly than high-grade lesions: evidence from an international multi-centre study.低级别乳腺导管原位癌的进展速度比高级别病变慢:来自国际多中心研究的证据。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Oct;177(3):761-765. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05333-6. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
7
The method of detection of ductal carcinoma in situ has no therapeutic implications: results of a population-based cohort study.原位导管癌的检测方法并无治疗意义:一项基于人群的队列研究结果
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Mar 9;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0819-4.
8
Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.在接受乳腺钼靶筛查的女性中检测导管原位癌。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Oct 16;94(20):1546-54. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.20.1546.
9
Variation in detection of ductal carcinoma in situ during screening mammography: a survey within the International Cancer Screening Network.筛查性乳房 X 光摄影中导管原位癌检测的变化:国际癌症筛查网络内的调查。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jan;50(1):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
10
Low-risk DCIS. What is it? Observe or excise?低危 DCIS。这是什么?观察还是切除?
Virchows Arch. 2022 Jan;480(1):21-32. doi: 10.1007/s00428-021-03173-8. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Mammography screening and incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in Italy: an age-period-cohort analysis.意大利乳腺钼靶筛查与乳腺导管原位癌发病率:年龄-时期-队列分析
Int J Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 11;54(4). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaf102.