• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利乳腺钼靶筛查与乳腺导管原位癌发病率:年龄-时期-队列分析

Mammography screening and incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in Italy: an age-period-cohort analysis.

作者信息

Bucchi Lauro, Mancini Silvia, Biggeri Annibale, Vattiato Rosa, Giuliani Orietta, Ravaioli Alessandra, Baldacchini Flavia, Zamagni Federica, Falcini Fabio

机构信息

Emilia-Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) Dino Amadori, Meldola, Forlì, Italy.

Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 11;54(4). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaf102.

DOI:10.1093/ije/dyaf102
PMID:40557614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12188216/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is attributed to mammography screening, but the trend has so far been evaluated only descriptively.

METHODS

We report an age-period-cohort modelling analysis of the incidence trend (1992-2017) observed among screening-aged women living in a region of northern Italy, where a mammography screening programme was implemented in 1996-98 (age 50-69 years) and 2010-14 (age 45-49 and 70-74 years).

RESULTS

The incidence of DCIS increased by an annual average of 9.1% (age 60-64 years) to 14.9% (age 70-74 years). The incidence peak followed a complex age-time pattern indicating an interaction between age and period, which suggested a cohort effect explained by the screening programme. In the age-period-cohort analysis, the birth cohort had a 2-fold effect. The nonlinear effect consisted of an increase in incidence for the generations of 1933-42 and 1943-52, targeted by screening since 1997, and of a second increase for the cohort of 1963-72, first invited in 2010. Taking into account the early excess incidence due to the introduction of the screening programme, the linear effect consisted of an annual 4.0% increase in the risk of DCIS for all successive birth cohorts or calendar periods, which was only partially attributable to the programme.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in incidence rates resulted from an increased detection of DCIS through the screening programme and from an uptrend in the risk of diagnosis that can be attributed either to long-term changes in diagnostic scrutiny independent of the programme or to an increased exposure to risk factors.

摘要

背景

乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)发病率的上升归因于乳腺钼靶筛查,但迄今为止,这一趋势仅得到了描述性评估。

方法

我们报告了一项针对居住在意大利北部某地区的筛查年龄女性(1992 - 2017年)中观察到的发病趋势的年龄 - 时期 - 队列建模分析,该地区于1996 - 1998年(年龄50 - 69岁)和2010 - 2014年(年龄45 - 49岁和70 - 74岁)实施了乳腺钼靶筛查项目。

结果

DCIS的发病率平均每年上升9.1%(年龄60 - 64岁)至14.9%(年龄70 - 74岁)。发病高峰呈现出复杂的年龄 - 时间模式,表明年龄与时期之间存在相互作用,这提示了筛查项目所导致的队列效应。在年龄 - 时期 - 队列分析中,出生队列有2倍的影响。非线性效应包括1933 - 1942年和1943 - 1952年这几代人的发病率上升,自1997年起这些人群成为筛查对象,以及1963 - 1972年队列的发病率再次上升,该队列于2010年首次被邀请参加筛查。考虑到筛查项目引入导致的早期发病率过高,线性效应包括所有连续出生队列或日历时期中DCIS风险每年增加4.0%,这仅部分归因于该项目。

结论

发病率的上升是由于通过筛查项目对DCIS的检测增加,以及诊断风险的上升趋势,这一趋势可能归因于与项目无关的诊断检查的长期变化,或者是危险因素暴露的增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302f/12188216/79917031086d/dyaf102f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302f/12188216/f6305dd7b21b/dyaf102f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302f/12188216/d47366f5c228/dyaf102f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302f/12188216/b968c0d30ae8/dyaf102f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302f/12188216/84e44e0c68b8/dyaf102f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302f/12188216/79917031086d/dyaf102f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302f/12188216/f6305dd7b21b/dyaf102f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302f/12188216/d47366f5c228/dyaf102f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302f/12188216/b968c0d30ae8/dyaf102f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302f/12188216/84e44e0c68b8/dyaf102f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302f/12188216/79917031086d/dyaf102f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Mammography screening and incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in Italy: an age-period-cohort analysis.意大利乳腺钼靶筛查与乳腺导管原位癌发病率:年龄-时期-队列分析
Int J Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 11;54(4). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaf102.
2
Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes.乳腺导管原位癌:发病率、治疗和结局的系统评价。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 3;102(3):170-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp482. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
3
Imaging findings for response evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新辅助全身治疗后乳腺癌患者导管原位癌反应评估的影像学发现:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Aug;33(8):5423-5435. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09547-7. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
4
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
5
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.乳腺 X 线摄影联合乳腺超声与乳腺 X 线摄影用于一般风险女性乳腺癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 31;3(3):CD009632. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009632.pub3.
6
Benefits and harms of breast cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40-49 years: A systematic review.40-49 岁女性乳腺 X 线筛查的获益与危害:系统评价。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Oct 1;141(7):1295-1306. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30794. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
7
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation.不同原发性乳腺癌治疗后监测性乳房 X 光造影方案的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价注册库分析和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Sep;15(34):v-vi, 1-322. doi: 10.3310/hta15340.
8
Mammographic density, endocrine therapy and breast cancer risk: a prognostic and predictive biomarker review.乳腺密度、内分泌治疗与乳腺癌风险:预后和预测生物标志物综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 26;10(10):CD013091. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013091.pub2.
9
Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review.荷兰各市开展基于人群的乳腺钼靶筛查及其对乳腺癌死亡率的影响:一项系统评价
Lancet. 2003 Apr 26;361(9367):1411-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13132-7.
10
Breast Cancer Incidence After a False-Positive Mammography Result.乳腺假阳性钼靶摄影结果后的乳腺癌发病情况。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Jan 1;10(1):63-70. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4519.

本文引用的文献

1
Active Monitoring With or Without Endocrine Therapy for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: The COMET Randomized Clinical Trial.低风险导管原位癌采用或不采用内分泌治疗的主动监测:COMET随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Mar 18;333(11):972-980. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.26698.
2
Risk perception of patients with ductal carcinoma (DCIS) of the breast and their healthcare practitioners: The importance of histopathological terminology, and the gaps in our knowledge.乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)患者及其医护人员的风险认知:组织病理学术语的重要性以及我们知识上的差距。
Histol Histopathol. 2025 Mar;40(3):297-306. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-806. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
3
Germline-mediated immunoediting sculpts breast cancer subtypes and metastatic proclivity.
种系介导的免疫编辑塑造乳腺癌亚型和转移倾向。
Science. 2024 May 31;384(6699):eadh8697. doi: 10.1126/science.adh8697.
4
Recruiting women with ductal carcinoma in situ to a randomised controlled trial: lessons from the LORIS study.招募乳腺导管原位癌女性参加随机对照试验:LORIS 研究的经验教训。
Trials. 2023 Oct 14;24(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07703-4.
5
Is it Time to Retire the Term of Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and Replace it With Ductal Neoplasia?是时候摒弃“低级别导管原位癌”这一术语,并用“导管瘤变”取而代之了吗?
Adv Anat Pathol. 2023 Nov 1;30(6):361-367. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000418. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
6
Active surveillance versus treatment in low-risk DCIS: Women's preferences in the LORD-trial.主动监测与低危 DCIS 治疗:LORD 试验中的女性偏好。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Oct;192:113276. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113276. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
7
Should low-risk DCIS lose the cancer label? An evidence review.低危 DCIS 是否应该去掉“癌症”标签?一项证据回顾。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jun;199(3):415-433. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06934-y. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
8
Screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ, 2008-2020: An observational study.2008-2020 年筛查发现的导管原位癌:一项观察性研究。
J Med Screen. 2022 Sep;29(3):172-177. doi: 10.1177/09691413221090739. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
9
Identifying ductal carcinoma in situ cases not requiring surgery to exclude postoperative upgrade to invasive ductal carcinoma.识别不需要手术来排除术后升级为浸润性导管癌的导管原位癌病例。
Breast Cancer. 2022 Jul;29(4):610-617. doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01338-0. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
10
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: State-of-the-Art Review.导管原位癌:最新综述。
Radiology. 2022 Feb;302(2):246-255. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211839. Epub 2021 Dec 21.