• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物炭的施用可以改善岩溶石灰土的理化性质和酶活性,提高甜茶幼苗的生理性能。

Biochar application improves karstic lime soil physicochemical properties and enzymes activity and enhances sweet tea seedlings physiological performance.

机构信息

Center of Molecular Ecological Physiology (CMEP), College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

Department of Ecology, School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 15;830:154815. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154815. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154815
PMID:35341840
Abstract

Karst lime soil, commonly found in rocky desert ecosystems of Southwest China, exhibits high pH, poor water retention, and intense erosion. To prevent further soil erosion and soil losses from these ecosystems, stabilization measures based on improved green infrastructure are needed. The present study aimed at elucidating the performance of sweet tea (Lithocarpus polystachyus) seedlings grown on this soil type upon biochar application. Biochar was classified into different particle sizes, viz. 0.25-0.5 mm (medium), 0.5-1 mm (coarse), 1-2 mm (gravel), and their mixture, and added at the concentrations of 1, 2, or 5% soil mass. The pH, moisture, and porosity of soil increased upon biochar application compared to control; however, soil bulk density significantly decreased. The activity of soil phosphatase was increased by biochar particle size. Biochar particle size and concentration significantly enhanced the soil organic carbon content, but they differently affected total and plant-available nutrients in the soil. Light-saturated photosynthesis was positively affected, while stomatal conductance, leaf transpiration, and the intercellular CO concentrations of sweet tea leaves were negatively affected by biochar particle size and/or concentration compared to control. Leaf chlorophyll and soluble protein contents were increased by biochar application. From these results, we conclude that biochar can improve soil properties and the performance of sweet tea seedlings grown on Karst lime soil. We suggest its application at a concentration of 2% soil mass for keeping a high physiological performance of sweet tea seedlings in this environment. The selection of the ideal particle size is context-specific and depends on the target outcome.

摘要

喀斯特石灰土常见于中国西南地区的岩石荒漠生态系统,具有高 pH 值、保水能力差和强烈侵蚀等特点。为了防止这些生态系统进一步遭受土壤侵蚀和土壤流失,需要基于改良的绿色基础设施采取稳定措施。本研究旨在阐明在这种土壤类型上种植甜茶(Lithocarpus polystachyus)幼苗时,生物炭的应用效果。将生物炭分为不同粒径,即 0.25-0.5 毫米(中粒径)、0.5-1 毫米(粗粒径)、1-2 毫米(砾石粒径)及其混合物,并以土壤质量的 1%、2%或 5%的浓度添加。与对照相比,生物炭的应用增加了土壤的 pH 值、水分和孔隙度,但显著降低了土壤容重。土壤磷酸酶的活性随着生物炭粒径的增加而增加。生物炭粒径和浓度显著提高了土壤有机碳含量,但它们对土壤中总养分和植物有效养分的影响不同。与对照相比,生物炭粒径和/或浓度显著提高了甜茶叶片的光饱和光合作用,而降低了气孔导度、叶片蒸腾和胞间 CO2 浓度。生物炭的应用增加了叶片叶绿素和可溶性蛋白的含量。综上所述,生物炭可以改善喀斯特石灰土上甜茶幼苗的生长环境。我们建议将其以 2%土壤质量的浓度应用,以保持甜茶幼苗在这种环境下的高生理性能。理想粒径的选择是具体情况具体分析的,取决于目标结果。

相似文献

1
Biochar application improves karstic lime soil physicochemical properties and enzymes activity and enhances sweet tea seedlings physiological performance.生物炭的施用可以改善岩溶石灰土的理化性质和酶活性,提高甜茶幼苗的生理性能。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 15;830:154815. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154815. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
2
Remediation of an acidic mine spoil: Miscanthus biochar and lime amendment affects metal availability, plant growth, and soil enzyme activity.酸性矿山尾矿修复:芒草生物炭和石灰改良剂对金属有效性、植物生长和土壤酶活性的影响。
Chemosphere. 2018 Aug;205:709-718. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.107. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
3
Biochar of invasive plants alleviated impact of acid rain on soil microbial community structure and functionality better than liming.入侵植物生物炭比石灰更能缓解酸雨对土壤微生物群落结构和功能的影响。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024 Sep 1;282:116726. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116726. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Distribution and transformation of lead in rice plants grown in contaminated soil amended with biochar and lime.污染土壤中施用生物炭和石灰对水稻植株中铅的分布和转化的影响。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018 Dec 15;165:589-596. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.09.039. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
5
Effects of elevated CO on foliar soluble nutrients and functional components of tea, and population dynamics of tea aphid, Toxoptera aurantii.CO 升高对茶树叶片可溶性养分和功能成分及茶蚜种群动态的影响。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019 Dec;145:84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
6
Effect of dolomite and biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from acidic tea field soil.添加白云石和生物炭对酸性茶园土壤N2O和CO2排放的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 2;13(2):e0192235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192235. eCollection 2018.
7
Alleviation of atrazine toxicity to maize seedlings grown in soils with amendment of biochar derived from wheat under different temperatures.在不同温度下,用小麦生物炭改良土壤缓解莠去津对玉米幼苗的毒性。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Aug;26(24):24362-24371. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05682-1. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
8
Investigations of the effect of the amount of biochar on soil porosity and aggregation and crop yields on fertilized black soil in northern China.研究生物炭施用量对中国北方黑土土壤孔隙度和团聚体以及作物产量的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 17;15(11):e0238883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238883. eCollection 2020.
9
[Effect of Biochar Application on Soil Aggregates Distribution and Moisture Retention in Orchard Soil].生物炭施用于果园土壤对土壤团聚体分布及保水能力的影响
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2016 Jan 15;37(1):293-300.
10
Efficiency of lime, biochar, Fe containing biochar and composite amendments for Cd and Pb immobilization in a co-contaminated alluvial soil.石灰、生物炭、含 Fe 生物炭和复合改良剂对 Cd 和 Pb 在受复合污染冲积土中固定效率的影响。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Feb;257:113609. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113609. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Bamboo charcoal affects soil properties and bacterial community in tea plantations.竹炭影响茶园土壤性质和细菌群落。
Open Life Sci. 2023 Aug 8;18(1):20220681. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0681. eCollection 2023.