Why research institutions should indemnify researchers against POPIA civil liability.
作者信息
Swales Lee, Thaldar Donrich, Donnelly Dusty-Lee
机构信息
School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
出版信息
S Afr J Sci. 2022 Mar-Apr;118(3-4). doi: 10.17159/sajs.2022/13205.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Why research institutions should indemnify researchers against POPIA civil liability.为何研究机构应为研究人员提供针对《个人信息保护法》民事责任的赔偿。
S Afr J Sci. 2022 Mar-Apr;118(3-4). doi: 10.17159/sajs.2022/13205.
2
Does data protection law in South Africa apply to pseudonymised data?南非的数据保护法适用于假名化数据吗？
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1238749. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1238749. eCollection 2023.
3
Research and the meaning of 'public interest' in POPIA.《个人信息保护法案》中“公共利益”的研究及其意义。
S Afr J Sci. 2022 Mar 7;118(3-4). doi: 10.17159/sajs.2022/13206.
4
Data protection, data management, and data sharing: Stakeholder perspectives on the protection of personal health information in South Africa.数据保护、数据管理和数据共享：南非个人健康信息保护的利益相关者视角。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 20;16(12):e0260341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260341. eCollection 2021.
5
[Study and application of legislative changes on liability for medical damage in the Civil Code].[《民法典》中医疗损害责任立法变化的研究与应用]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 May 25;101(19):1381-1402. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210125-00235.
6
7
Protection of Personal Information Act No. 4 of 2013: Implications for biobanks.2013 年第 4 号《个人信息保护法》：对生物库的影响。
S Afr Med J. 2019 Mar 29;109(4):232-234. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i4.13617.
8
A Study of Reliance Agreement Templates Used by U.S. Research Institutions.美国研究机构使用的信赖协议模板研究
IRB. 2018 May-Jun;40(3):6-10. doi: 10.1002/eahr.403002. Epub 2018 May 1.
9
[[Selected legal aspects related to medical practice].[与医疗实践相关的选定法律方面]
Folia Med Cracov. 1998;39(3-4):97-120.
10
Do you understand your risk? Liability and third-party evaluations in civil litigation.你了解自己面临的风险吗？民事诉讼中的责任与第三方评估。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2007;35(2):200-10.
引用本文的文献
1
Cross-border data sharing for research in Africa: An analysis of the data protection and research ethics requirements in 12 jurisdictions.非洲研究中的跨境数据共享：对12个司法管辖区的数据保护和研究伦理要求的分析
Res Sq. 2024 Apr 15:rs.3.rs-4217849. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4217849/v1.
2
The wisdom of claiming ownership of human genomic data: A cautionary tale for research institutions.宣称对人类基因组数据拥有所有权的后果：给研究机构的警示故事。
Dev World Bioeth. 2025 Mar;25(1):16-23. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12443. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
3
Towards a data transfer agreement for the South African research community: The empowerment approach.为南非研究界制定数据传输协议：赋权方法。
S Afr J Bioeth Law. 2023 Apr;16(1):13-18. doi: 10.7196/SAJBL.2023.v16i1.827. Epub 2023 May 8.
Zotero 插件