Yamaguchi Junichi, Matoba Tetsuya, Kikuchi Migaku, Minami Yuichiro, Kojima Sunao, Hanada Hiroyuki, Mano Toshiaki, Nakashima Takahiro, Hashiba Katsutaka, Yamamoto Takeshi, Tanaka Akihito, Matsuo Kunihiro, Nakayama Naoki, Nomura Osamu, Tahara Yoshio, Nonogi Hiroshi
Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Faculty of Medical Sciences Fukuoka Japan.
Circ Rep. 2022 Feb 25;4(3):109-115. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-21-0160. eCollection 2022 Mar 10.
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is now widely accepted. Recent guidelines have focused on total ischemic time, because shorter total ischemic time is associated with a more favorable prognosis. The door-in to door-out (DIDO) time, defined as time from arrival at a non-PCI-capable hospital to leaving for a PCI-capable hospital, may affect STEMI patient prognosis. However, a relevant meta-analysis is lacking. We searched PubMed for clinical studies comparing short-term (30-day and in-hospital) mortality rates of STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with DIDO times of ≤30 vs. >30 min. Two investigators independently screened the search results and extracted the data. Random effects estimators with weights calculated by the inverse variance method were used to determine pooled risk ratios. The search retrieved 1,260 studies; of these, 2 retrospective cohort studies (15,596 patients) were analyzed. In the DIDO time ≤30 and >30 min groups, the primary endpoint (i.e., in-hospital or 30-day mortality) occurred for 51 of 1,794 (2.8%) and 831 of 13,802 (6.0%) patients, respectively. The incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly lower in the DIDO time ≤30 min group (odds ratio 0.45; 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.60). Our findings suggest that a DIDO time ≤30 min is associated with a lower short-term mortality rate. However, further larger systematic reviews and meta-analyses are needed to validate our findings.
目前,ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)已被广泛接受。近期指南关注的重点是总缺血时间,因为总缺血时间越短,预后越好。门到门(DIDO)时间定义为从抵达无PCI能力的医院到转至有PCI能力的医院离开的时间,可能会影响STEMI患者的预后。然而,目前缺乏相关的荟萃分析。我们在PubMed上检索了比较DIDO时间≤30分钟与>30分钟的STEMI患者接受直接PCI的短期(30天和住院期间)死亡率的临床研究。两名研究人员独立筛选检索结果并提取数据。采用逆方差法计算权重的随机效应估计器来确定合并风险比。检索到1260项研究;其中,对2项回顾性队列研究(15596例患者)进行了分析。在DIDO时间≤30分钟和>30分钟的组中,主要终点(即住院期间或30天死亡率)分别在1794例患者中的51例(2.8%)和13802例患者中的831例(6.0%)中出现。DIDO时间≤30分钟组的主要终点发生率显著较低(优势比0.45;95%置信区间0.34 - 0.60)。我们的研究结果表明,DIDO时间≤30分钟与较低的短期死亡率相关。然而,需要进一步进行更大规模的系统评价和荟萃分析来验证我们的研究结果。