• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科攻击性行为风险评估工具的多中心研究

Multisite study of Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool in emergency departments.

作者信息

Kim Son Chae, Kaiser Jennifer, Bulson Julie, Hosford Tracy, Nurski Ashleigh, Sadat Carol, Kalinowski Nicole

机构信息

School of Nursing Point Loma Nazarene University San Diego California USA.

Nursing Professional Practice and Development Spectrum Health Grand Rapids Michigan USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Mar 17;3(2):e12693. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12693. eCollection 2022 Apr.

DOI:10.1002/emp2.12693
PMID:35342897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8931314/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Violence is a major preventable problem in emergency departments (EDs), and validated screening tools are needed to identify potentially violent patients. We aimed to test the utility of the Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool (ABRAT) for screening patients in the ED.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted among adult and pediatric patients aged ≥10 years visiting 3 emergency departments in Michigan between May 1, 2021, and June 30, 2021. Triage nurses completed the 16-item checklist using electronic health records (EHRs), and the occurrence of violent incidents were collected before ED disposition. A multivariate logistic regression model was applied to select a parsimonious set of items.

RESULTS

Among 10,554 patients, 127 had ≥1 violent incidents (1.2%). The regression model resulted in a 7-item ABRAT for EDs, including history of aggression and mental illness and reason for visit, as well as 4 violent behavior indicators. Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that the area under the curve was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.95), with a sensitivity of 84.3% (95% CI, 76.5%-89.9%) and specificity of 95.3% (95% CI, 94.8%-95.7%) at the optimal cutoff score of 1. An alternative cutoff score of 4 for identifying patients at high risk for violence had a sensitivity and specificity of 70.1% and 98.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The ABRAT for EDs appears to be a simple yet comprehensive checklist with a high sensitivity and specificity for identifying potentially violent patients in EDs. The availability of such a screening checklist in the EHR may allow rapid identification of high-risk patients and implementation of focused mitigation measures to protect emergency staff and patients.

摘要

目的

暴力行为是急诊科可预防的主要问题,因此需要经过验证的筛查工具来识别潜在的暴力患者。我们旨在测试攻击行为风险评估工具(ABRAT)在急诊科筛查患者的效用。

方法

对2021年5月1日至2021年6月30日期间在密歇根州3家急诊科就诊的年龄≥10岁的成人和儿科患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。分诊护士使用电子健康记录(EHR)完成了16项清单,并在急诊科处置前收集暴力事件的发生情况。应用多变量逻辑回归模型选择一组简洁的项目。

结果

在10554名患者中,127人发生了≥1次暴力事件(1.2%)。回归模型得出了一个适用于急诊科的7项ABRAT,包括攻击史、精神疾病史、就诊原因以及4个暴力行为指标。受试者工作特征分析表明,曲线下面积为0.91(95%置信区间[CI],0.87 - 0.95),在最佳截断分数为1时,敏感性为84.3%(95%CI,76.5% - 89.9%),特异性为95.3%(95%CI,94.8% - 95.7%)。用于识别暴力高风险患者的另一个截断分数为4时,敏感性和特异性分别为70.1%和98.9%。

结论

急诊科ABRAT似乎是一个简单而全面的清单,对识别急诊科潜在的暴力患者具有较高的敏感性和特异性。电子健康记录中提供这样的筛查清单可能有助于快速识别高风险患者,并实施针对性的缓解措施以保护急诊医护人员和患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d20/8931314/9ae00cc43fe3/EMP2-3-e12693-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d20/8931314/8787054e66fe/EMP2-3-e12693-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d20/8931314/9ae00cc43fe3/EMP2-3-e12693-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d20/8931314/8787054e66fe/EMP2-3-e12693-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d20/8931314/9ae00cc43fe3/EMP2-3-e12693-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Multisite study of Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool in emergency departments.急诊科攻击性行为风险评估工具的多中心研究
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Mar 17;3(2):e12693. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12693. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Aggressive Behaviour Risk Assessment Tool for Hospitalised Patients in Non-Psychiatric Inpatient Units.非精神科住院病房住院患者攻击行为风险评估工具
J Adv Nurs. 2025 May;81(5):2393-2401. doi: 10.1111/jan.16418. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
3
A workplace violence prevention program targeting high-risk patients in emergency departments.一项针对急诊科高危患者的工作场所暴力预防计划。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Jul 25;5(4):e13206. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13206. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Usefulness of Aggressive Behaviour Risk Assessment Tool for prospectively identifying violent patients in medical and surgical units.用于前瞻性识别医疗和外科病房中暴力患者的攻击性行为风险评估工具的实用性。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Feb;68(2):349-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05744.x. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
5
Predicting aggressive behavior in psychiatric patients in emergency department: A systematic literature review.预测急诊科精神病患者的攻击行为:系统文献综述。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;80:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.02.040. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
6
[Usefulness of Korean Version of Behavioral Cue Checklist for Predicting of Patient Violence in Emergency Departments].
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018 Jun;48(3):289-297. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.3.289.
7
Utility of the Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool in long-term care homes.攻击性行为风险评估工具在长期护理机构中的效用。
Geriatr Nurs. 2017 Sep-Oct;38(5):417-422. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
8
Screening for Behavioral Health Patient Aggression in Emergency Departments to Reduce Workplace Violence.在急诊科筛查行为健康患者的攻击行为,以减少工作场所暴力。
J Emerg Nurs. 2023 May;49(3):403-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
9
"I think we still do too little": measures to prevent violence and aggression in German emergency departments - a qualitative study.“我认为我们做得还不够”:德国急诊部门预防暴力和侵犯行为的措施——一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 30;23(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09044-z.
10
Diagnostic Sensitivity of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression to Predict Violence and Aggression by Behavioral Health Patients in the Emergency Department.动态评估情境性攻击对预测急诊科行为健康患者暴力和攻击的诊断敏感性。
J Emerg Nurs. 2020 May;46(3):302-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2019.12.006. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool for Emergency Medical Services.紧急医疗服务攻击性行为风险评估工具
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 Mar 18;6(3):100095. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The Risk for Violence Screening Tool: a psychometric validation and reliability study.暴力风险筛查工具:一项心理测量学验证与可靠性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Dec 5;8:100280. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100280. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Deep learning models can predict violence and threats against healthcare providers using clinical notes.

本文引用的文献

1
Workplace violence in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急诊科工作场所暴力:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Public Health. 2021 Jul;196:186-197. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
2
United States' Performance on Emergency Department Throughput, 2006 to 2016.美国 2006 年至 2016 年急诊科吞吐量绩效表现
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;78(1):174-190. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
3
Trends in US Emergency Department Visits for Mental Health, Overdose, and Violence Outcomes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
深度学习模型可以利用临床记录预测针对医疗服务提供者的暴力行为和威胁。
Npj Ment Health Res. 2024 Dec 5;3(1):61. doi: 10.1038/s44184-024-00105-7.
4
A workplace violence prevention program targeting high-risk patients in emergency departments.一项针对急诊科高危患者的工作场所暴力预防计划。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Jul 25;5(4):e13206. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13206. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Incident of violence escalation of patients with psychiatric emergencies boarding in the emergency department in the central region of Thailand and its association: a prospective observational study.泰国中部地区精神科急诊留观患者暴力升级事件及其相关性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 27;24(1):768. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11228-0.
6
Validation of a violence risk screening for youth in psychiatric inpatient care-a pilot study of V-RISK-Y.精神科住院护理中青少年暴力风险筛查的验证——V-RISK-Y的一项试点研究
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 26;14:1210871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1210871. eCollection 2023.
美国在新冠疫情前后因心理健康、药物过量和暴力而前往急诊部就诊的趋势。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 1;78(4):372-379. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4402.
4
Emergency Department Evaluation of the Adult Psychiatric Patient.成人精神科患者的急诊科评估
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2020 May;38(2):419-435. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2020.02.001.
5
Characteristics of aggressive incidents in emergency primary health care described by the Staff Observation Aggression Scale - Revised Emergency (SOAS-RE).《员工观察攻击量表修订版-急诊(SOAS-RE)》描述的急诊初级卫生保健中攻击事件的特征。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 13;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4856-9.
6
Association of Mental Health Disorders With Health Care Utilization and Costs Among Adults With Chronic Disease.精神障碍与慢性病患者的医疗保健利用和费用的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199910. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9910.
7
Review article: Identifying occupational violence patient risk factors and risk assessment tools in the emergency department: A scoping review.综述文章:识别急诊科职业暴力患者的风险因素及风险评估工具:一项范围综述。
Emerg Med Australas. 2019 Oct;31(5):730-740. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13362. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
8
Predicting aggressive patient behaviour in a hospital emergency department: An empirical study of security officers using the Brøset Violence Checklist.预测医院急诊科患者的攻击性行为:一项使用布罗泽特暴力检查表对安保人员进行的实证研究。
Australas Emerg Care. 2018 Feb;21(1):31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2017.11.001. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
9
Physical and verbal violence against health care workers.针对医护人员的身体暴力和言语暴力。
Sentinel Event Alert. 2018 Apr 17(59):1-9.
10
Aggressive Behaviour Risk Assessment Tool for newly admitted residents of long-term care homes.长期护理院新入院居民攻击性行为风险评估工具
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Jul;73(7):1747-1756. doi: 10.1111/jan.13247. Epub 2017 Jan 31.