• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

攻击性行为风险评估工具在长期护理机构中的效用。

Utility of the Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool in long-term care homes.

作者信息

Berry Brigette, Young Lori, Kim Son Chae

机构信息

Extendicare (Canada) Inc., Unit 227, 333 Aspen Glen Landing SW, Calgary, AB T3H ON6, Canada.

St. David's School of Nursing, Texas State University, 1555 University Blvd., Round Rock, TX 78665, USA.

出版信息

Geriatr Nurs. 2017 Sep-Oct;38(5):417-422. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.02.004
PMID:28291564
Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the utility of the Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool (ABRAT) and the Aggressive Behavior Scale (ABS) for predicting aggressive incidents among newly-admitted and existing residents of two long-term care homes in Canada. Of 316 residents, 27 had at least one aggressive incident (8.5%). Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that the area under the curve for the ABRAT was 0.86 (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.81-0.92) and that for the ABS was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.64-0.85). Sensitivity and specificity at the optimal cutoff score of 2 for the ABRAT were 96.3% and 65.4%, respectively, and those for the ABS at the optimal cutoff score of 3 were 59.3% and 80.6%, respectively. The ABRAT appears to be promising for use in long-term care homes for identifying potentially aggressive residents. However, further studies are needed to test the utility of the ABRAT among newly-admitted residents.

摘要

本研究旨在确定攻击行为风险评估工具(ABRAT)和攻击行为量表(ABS)在预测加拿大两家长期护理机构新入住居民和现有居民攻击事件方面的效用。在316名居民中,27人至少发生过一次攻击事件(8.5%)。受试者工作特征分析表明,ABRAT的曲线下面积为0.86(95%置信区间[CI],0.81 - 0.92),ABS的曲线下面积为0.75(95%CI,0.64 - 0.85)。ABRAT在最佳临界值为2时的敏感性和特异性分别为96.3%和65.4%,ABS在最佳临界值为3时的敏感性和特异性分别为59.3%和80.6%。ABRAT在长期护理机构中用于识别潜在攻击性行为居民似乎很有前景。然而,需要进一步研究以测试ABRAT在新入住居民中的效用。

相似文献

1
Utility of the Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool in long-term care homes.攻击性行为风险评估工具在长期护理机构中的效用。
Geriatr Nurs. 2017 Sep-Oct;38(5):417-422. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
2
Aggressive behaviour risk assessment tool for long-term care (ABRAT-L): Validation study.长期护理攻击性行为风险评估工具(ABRAT-L):验证研究。
Geriatr Nurs. 2019 May-Jun;40(3):284-289. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
3
Aggressive Behaviour Risk Assessment Tool for newly admitted residents of long-term care homes.长期护理院新入院居民攻击性行为风险评估工具
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Jul;73(7):1747-1756. doi: 10.1111/jan.13247. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
4
Aggressive Behaviour Risk Assessment Tool for Hospitalised Patients in Non-Psychiatric Inpatient Units.非精神科住院病房住院患者攻击行为风险评估工具
J Adv Nurs. 2025 May;81(5):2393-2401. doi: 10.1111/jan.16418. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
5
Multisite study of Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool in emergency departments.急诊科攻击性行为风险评估工具的多中心研究
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Mar 17;3(2):e12693. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12693. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
The clinical utility of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia as a routine assessment in nursing homes.用于痴呆症抑郁评估的康奈尔量表在养老院作为常规评估工具的临床效用。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;23(8):784-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
7
Factors associated with resident aggression toward caregivers in nursing homes.与养老院居民对护理人员的攻击行为相关的因素。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012 Sep;44(3):249-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01459.x. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
8
Level of Need, Divertibility, and Outcomes of Newly Admitted Nursing Home Residents.新入院养老院居民的需求水平、可转移程度和结局。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):616-623. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
9
Use of a mobile device by nursing home residents for long-term care comprehensive geriatric self-assessment: a feasibility study.养老院居民使用移动设备进行长期护理综合老年自我评估:一项可行性研究。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2015 Jan;33(1):28-36. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000115.
10
[Nurses' experiences with aggressive behaviour of nursing home residents: a cross sectional study in Swiss nursing homes].[护士对养老院居民攻击性行为的经历:瑞士养老院的横断面研究]
Pflege. 2013 Oct;26(5):321-35. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000316.

引用本文的文献

1
Static and Dynamic Variables Associated with Inpatient Aggression: A Two-Year Retrospective Study: Variables statiques et dynamiques associées au comportement agressif des patients hospitalisés : étude rétrospective de deux ans.与住院患者攻击行为相关的静态和动态变量:一项为期两年的回顾性研究:与住院患者攻击性行为相关的静态和动态变量:两年回顾性研究
Can J Psychiatry. 2025 May 25:7067437251343293. doi: 10.1177/07067437251343293.
2
The "Violent Resident": A Critical Exploration of the Ethics of Resident-to-Resident Aggression.“暴力居民”:对居民间攻击行为的伦理探讨。
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Jun;16(2):173-183. doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09898-1. Epub 2019 Feb 11.