Garcia-Larrea Luis, Quesada Charles
Central Integration of Pain (NeuroPain) Lab, Lyon Center for Neuroscience (CRNL), INSERM U1028, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France -
University Hospital Pain Center (CETD), Neurological Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France -
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Apr;58(2):290-305. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07411-1. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
Epidural stimulation of the motor cortex (eMCS) was devised in the 1990's, and has now largely supplanted thalamic stimulation for neuropathic pain relief. Its mechanisms of action involve activation of multiple cortico-subcortical areas initiated in the thalamus, with involvement of endogenous opioids and descending inhibition toward the spinal cord. Evidence for clinical efficacy is now supported by at least seven RCTs; benefits may persist up to 10 years, and can be reasonably predicted by preoperative use of non-invasive repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS). rTMS first developed as a means of predicting the efficacy of epidural procedures, then as an analgesic method on its own right. Reasonable evidence from at least six well-conducted RCTs favors a significant analgesic effect of high-frequency rTMS of the motor cortex in neuropathic pain (NP), and less consistently in widespread/fibromyalgic pain. Stimulation of the dorsolateral frontal cortex (DLPFC) has not proven efficacious for pain, so far. The posterior operculo-insular cortex is a new and attractive target but evidence remains inconsistent. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is applied upon similar targets as rTMS and eMCS; it does not elicit action potentials but modulates the neuronal resting membrane state. tDCS presents practical advantages including low cost, few safety issues, and possibility of home-based protocols; however, the limited quality of most published reports entails a low level of evidence. Patients responsive to tDCS may differ from those improved by rTMS, and in both cases repeated sessions over a long time may be required to achieve clinically significant relief. Both invasive and non-invasive procedures exert their effects through multiple distributed brain networks influencing the sensory, affective and cognitive aspects of chronic pain. Their effects are mainly exerted upon abnormally sensitized pathways, rather than on acute physiological pain. Extending the duration of long-term benefits remains a challenge, for which different strategies are discussed in this review.
硬膜外运动皮层刺激(eMCS)于20世纪90年代被设计出来,如今在很大程度上已取代丘脑刺激用于缓解神经性疼痛。其作用机制包括激活起源于丘脑的多个皮质 - 皮质下区域,涉及内源性阿片类物质以及对脊髓的下行抑制。目前至少有七项随机对照试验(RCT)支持其临床疗效;益处可能持续长达10年,术前使用无创重复磁刺激(rTMS)可合理预测疗效。rTMS最初是作为预测硬膜外手术疗效的一种手段发展起来的,后来自身也成为一种镇痛方法。至少六项精心实施的RCT的合理证据表明,运动皮层高频rTMS对神经性疼痛(NP)有显著镇痛作用,而对广泛性/纤维肌痛性疼痛的作用则不太一致。到目前为止,刺激背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)对疼痛尚未 proven efficacious。后岛盖皮质是一个新的且有吸引力的靶点,但证据仍然不一致。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)应用于与rTMS和eMCS相似的靶点;它不会引发动作电位,但会调节神经元静息膜状态。tDCS具有实际优势,包括成本低、安全问题少以及可采用家庭治疗方案的可能性;然而,大多数已发表报告的质量有限,证据水平较低。对tDCS有反应的患者可能与rTMS改善的患者不同,在这两种情况下,可能都需要长时间重复治疗才能实现临床上显著的缓解。侵入性和非侵入性手术均通过影响慢性疼痛的感觉、情感和认知方面的多个分布式脑网络发挥作用。它们的作用主要施加于异常敏感的通路,而非急性生理性疼痛。延长长期益处的持续时间仍然是一项挑战,本综述讨论了针对此的不同策略。 (注:“proven efficacious”这里原英文表述有误,可能是“proven effective”,翻译时按纠正后的理解翻译为“已被证明有效” )