Suppr超能文献

配对急性侵入性/非侵入性刺激(PAINS)研究:慢性神经性疼痛的 I/II 期随机、假对照交叉试验。

Paired Acute Invasive/Non-invasive Stimulation (PAINS) study: A phase I/II randomized, sham-controlled crossover trial in chronic neuropathic pain.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Neurosurgery Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2021 Nov-Dec;14(6):1576-1585. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.10.384. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation, an invasive method of neuromodulation, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive method of altering cortical excitability, have both proven effective in relieving chronic pain.

OBJECTIVE

We employed a randomized, sham-controlled crossover study design to investigate whether single-session tDCS would have an additive therapeutic effect alongside DRG stimulation (DRGS) in the treatment of chronic pain.

METHODS

Sixteen neuropathic pain patients who were previously implanted with DRG stimulators were recruited. Baseline pain scores were established with DRGS-OFF. Pain scores were then recorded with DRGS-ON, after paired sham tDCS stimulation, and after paired active anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) stimulation. For active tDCS, patients were randomized to 'MEG (magnetoencephalography) localized' tDCS or contralateral motor cortex (M1) tDCS for 30 min. EEG recordings and evaluations of tDCS adverse effects were also collected.

RESULTS

All participants reported the interventions to be tolerable with no significant adverse effects during the session. Paired DRGS/active tDCS resulted in a significant reduction in pain scores compared to paired DRGS-ON/sham tDCS or DRGS alone. There was no difference in the additive effect of M1 vs. MEG-localized tDCS. Significant augmentation of beta activity was observed between DRGS-OFF and DRGS-ON conditions, as well as between paired DRGS-ON/sham tDCS and paired DRGS-ON/active tDCS.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that a single session of tDCS alongside DRGS is safe and can significantly reduce pain acutely in neuropathic pain patients. Paired invasive/non-invasive neuromodulation is a promising new treatment strategy for pain management and should be evaluated further to assess long-term benefits.

摘要

背景

背根神经节(DRG)刺激作为一种侵袭性的神经调节方法,以及经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)作为一种改变皮质兴奋性的非侵袭性方法,均已被证明在缓解慢性疼痛方面有效。

目的

我们采用随机、假刺激对照交叉研究设计,研究单次 tDCS 是否会与背根神经节刺激(DRGS)联合治疗慢性疼痛产生附加治疗效果。

方法

我们招募了 16 名先前植入背根神经节刺激器的神经性疼痛患者。在 DRGS-OFF 下建立基线疼痛评分。然后,在配对假刺激 tDCS 后和配对活性阳极 tDCS(a-tDCS)刺激后,记录 DRGS-ON 下的疼痛评分。对于活性 tDCS,患者被随机分配到“MEG(脑磁图)定位”tDCS 或对侧运动皮层(M1)tDCS 进行 30 分钟。还收集了 EEG 记录和 tDCS 不良反应的评估。

结果

所有参与者均报告干预措施在治疗过程中耐受良好,无明显不良反应。与配对 DRGS-ON/假刺激 tDCS 或单独 DRGS 相比,配对 DRGS/活性 tDCS 可显著降低疼痛评分。M1 与 MEG 定位 tDCS 的附加效果无差异。在 DRGS-OFF 和 DRGS-ON 条件之间以及配对 DRGS-ON/假刺激 tDCS 和配对 DRGS-ON/活性 tDCS 之间,观察到β活动的显著增强。

结论

我们的结果表明,DRGS 联合单次 tDCS 是安全的,可显著减轻神经性疼痛患者的急性疼痛。侵袭性/非侵袭性神经调节联合是疼痛管理的一种有前途的新治疗策略,应进一步评估以评估其长期益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验