• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一家三级护理教学医院对用于药物不良反应监测的触发工具方法的评估。

An evaluation of trigger tool method for adverse drug reaction monitoring at a tertiary care teaching hospital.

作者信息

Gohil Jaydipsinh B, Desai Chetna K, Panchal Jigar R, Patel Rajnish R, Rathod Gunvant H

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, B.J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Department of Surgery, B.J. Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Indian J Pharmacol. 2022 Jan-Feb;54(1):19-23. doi: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_764_20.

DOI:10.4103/ijp.ijp_764_20
PMID:35343203
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9012416/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Trigger tool method (TTM) is an active surveillance method for adverse drug reaction (ADR) monitoring. The study aimed to evaluate TTM for ADR monitoring in indoor patients of the surgery department.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, observational study was conducted at the Department of Surgery of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Gujarat. Patients of either gender and more than 18 years of age admitted to two selected surgery units were enrolled with prior informed consent. Preliminary trigger tool list (PTTL) comprising 13 drug triggers (DTs), 13 patient triggers (PTs), 9 laboratory triggers (LTs), and 12 surgical module triggers (STs) were used. Patients were followed up till discharge to monitor the occurrence of triggers and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 400 patients were included (male: female ratio of 2.3:1; mean age: 43.07 ± 16.4 years; and mean length of hospital stay: 5.75 ± 3.12 days). Of 400 patients, triggers were present in 359 patients (89.75%) and no trigger was observed in 41 patients (10.25%). Of the 47 triggers in PTTL, 24 triggers were observed 1155 times, of these 14 triggers lead to the detection of 49 ADRs in 43 patients. The rate of adverse drug events was 12.25/100 patients. DT was the most common trigger identified (81.64%). Positive predictive values (PPV) for PTs, STs, DTs, LTs were 26.88%, 23.07%, 10.3%, and 5.55%, respectively. The comprehensive PPV of PTTL was 11.97%. Modified trigger tool list consists of 14 triggers.

CONCLUSION

TTM is an effective method of ADR monitoring in the surgery department. An awareness of TT helps better detection of ADRs.

摘要

目的

触发工具法(TTM)是一种用于监测药物不良反应(ADR)的主动监测方法。本研究旨在评估TTM在外科住院患者中监测ADR的效果。

材料与方法

本前瞻性观察性研究在古吉拉特邦一家三级医疗教学医院的外科进行。入选两个选定外科病房的18岁以上男女患者,均获得事先知情同意。使用了包含13种药物触发因素(DTs)、13种患者触发因素(PTs)、9种实验室触发因素(LTs)和12种手术模块触发因素(STs)的初步触发工具清单(PTTL)。对患者进行随访直至出院,以监测触发因素和不良事件的发生情况。

结果

共纳入400例患者(男女比例为2.3:1;平均年龄:43.07±16.4岁;平均住院时间:5.75±3.12天)。400例患者中,359例(89.75%)存在触发因素,41例(10.25%)未观察到触发因素。在PTTL的47种触发因素中,观察到24种触发因素1155次,其中14种触发因素导致在43例患者中检测到49例ADR。药物不良事件发生率为12.25/100例患者。DT是最常见的已识别触发因素(81.64%)。PTs、STs、DTs、LTs的阳性预测值(PPV)分别为26.88%、23.07%、10.3%和5.55%。PTTL的综合PPV为11.97%。改良触发工具清单由14种触发因素组成。

结论

TTM是外科ADR监测的有效方法。了解TT有助于更好地检测ADR。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36a3/9012416/d9ea61975d1d/IJPharm-54-19-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36a3/9012416/d9ea61975d1d/IJPharm-54-19-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36a3/9012416/d9ea61975d1d/IJPharm-54-19-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
An evaluation of trigger tool method for adverse drug reaction monitoring at a tertiary care teaching hospital.一家三级护理教学医院对用于药物不良反应监测的触发工具方法的评估。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2022 Jan-Feb;54(1):19-23. doi: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_764_20.
2
An evaluation of trigger tool method for adverse drug reaction monitoring at a tertiary care teaching hospital.三级护理教学医院药物不良反应监测触发工具方法的评估
Perspect Clin Res. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):33-39. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_30_19. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
3
Frequency, types, severity, preventability and costs of Adverse Drug Reactions at a tertiary care hospital.一家三级护理医院的药品不良反应的发生率、类型、严重程度、可预防性及成本
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2016 Sep-Oct;81:323-34. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
4
Performance of the adverse drug event trigger tool and the global trigger tool for identifying adverse drug events: experience in a Belgian hospital.不良药物事件触发工具和全球触发工具在识别不良药物事件中的性能:比利时一家医院的经验。
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Nov;47(11):1414-9. doi: 10.1177/1060028013500939.
5
Performance of a trigger tool for detecting adverse drug reactions in patients with polypharmacy acutely admitted to the geriatric ward.用于检测老年病房急性住院多药治疗患者药物不良反应的触发工具的性能。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2022 Aug;13(4):837-847. doi: 10.1007/s41999-022-00649-x. Epub 2022 May 30.
6
Global Trigger Tool: Proficient Adverse Drug Reaction Autodetection Method in Critical Care Patient Units.全球触发工具:重症监护病房中熟练的药物不良反应自动检测方法
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;24(3):172-178. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23367.
7
Patterns of Adverse Drug Reaction in the Medical Wards of a Teaching Hospital: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.教学医院内科病房药物不良反应模式:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。
Curr Drug Saf. 2016;11(2):164-71. doi: 10.2174/1574886311666160225150106.
8
Validating the Chinese geriatric trigger tool and analyzing adverse drug event associated risk factors in elderly Chinese patients: A retrospective review.验证中文老年触发工具并分析老年中国患者药物不良事件相关风险因素:回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232095. eCollection 2020.
9
Evaluation of accuracy of IHI Trigger Tool in identifying adverse drug events: a prospective observational study.评估 IHI 触发工具识别药物不良事件的准确性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;84(10):2252-2259. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13665. Epub 2018 Jul 8.
10
The Trigger Tool Method for Routine Pharmacovigilance: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Medical Records of Hospitalized Geriatric Patients.触发工具法用于常规药物警戒:一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为住院老年患者的病历。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Mar 1;18(2):e393-e400. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000820.

引用本文的文献

1
Active monitoring of antifungal adverse events in hospitalized patients based on Global Trigger Tool method.基于全球触发工具法对住院患者抗真菌不良事件进行主动监测。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 28;15:1322587. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1322587. eCollection 2024.
2
Establishing a trigger tool based on global trigger tools to identify adverse drug events in obstetric inpatients in China.建立基于全球触发工具的触发工具,以识别中国产科住院患者的药物不良事件。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 15;24(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10449-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Detection of adverse events in general surgery using the " Trigger Tool" methodology.使用“触发工具”方法检测普通外科中的不良事件。
Cir Esp. 2015 Feb;93(2):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
2
WHO strategy for collecting safety data in public health programmes: complementing spontaneous reporting systems.世卫组织在公共卫生规划中收集安全数据的战略:补充自发报告系统。
Drug Saf. 2013 Feb;36(2):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s40264-012-0014-6.
3
Detection of adverse events in surgical patients using the Trigger Tool approach.
使用触发工具方法检测外科手术患者的不良事件。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Aug;17(4):253-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025080.
4
Focusing on the preventability of adverse drug reactions.关注药物不良反应的可预防性。
Hosp Pharm. 1992 Jun;27(6):538.
5
Preventability and severity assessment in reporting adverse drug reactions.药品不良反应报告中的可预防性和严重程度评估
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992 Sep;49(9):2229-32.