• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于全球触发工具法对住院患者抗真菌不良事件进行主动监测。

Active monitoring of antifungal adverse events in hospitalized patients based on Global Trigger Tool method.

作者信息

Meng Xiao, Wu Yaozhou, Liu Zixuan, Chen Yifan, Dou Zhizhou, Wei Li

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 28;15:1322587. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1322587. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2024.1322587
PMID:39005936
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11239385/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing prevalence of fungal infections necessitates broader use of antifungal medications. However, the prevalence of adverse drug events (ADEs) restricts their clinical application. This study aimed to develop a reliable ADEs trigger for antifungals to enable proactive ADEs monitoring, serving as a reference for ADEs prevention and control.

METHODS

This investigation comprises two phases. Initially, the trigger was established via a literature review, extraction of relevant items, and refinement through Delphi expert consultation. Subsequently, the validity of the trigger was assessed by analyzing hospital records of antifungal drug users from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020. The correlation between each trigger signal and ADEs occurrence was examined, and the sensitivity and specificity of the trigger were evaluated through the spontaneous reporting system (SRS) and Global Trigger Tool (GTT). Additionally, risk factors contributing to adverse drug events (ADEs) resulting from antifungal use were analyzed. Results: Twenty-one preliminary triggers were refined into 21 final triggers after one expert round. In the retrospective analysis, the positive trigger rate was 65.83%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 28.75%. The incidence of ADEs in inpatients was 28.75%, equating to 44.58 ADEs per 100 admissions and 33.04 ADEs per 1,000 patient days. Predominant ADEs categories included metabolic disturbances, gastrointestinal damage, and skin rashes. ADEs severity was classified into 36 cases at grade 1, 160 at grade 2, and 18 at grade 3. The likelihood of ADEs increased with longer stays, more positive triggers, and greater comorbidity counts.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the effectiveness of the GTT in enhancing ADEs detection during antifungal medication use, thereby confirming its value as a monitoring tool.

摘要

背景

真菌感染患病率的上升使得抗真菌药物的使用更为广泛。然而,药物不良事件(ADEs)的发生率限制了它们的临床应用。本研究旨在开发一种可靠的抗真菌药物ADEs触发工具,以实现对ADEs的主动监测,为ADEs的预防和控制提供参考。

方法

本调查包括两个阶段。首先,通过文献回顾、提取相关项目并经德尔菲专家咨询进行完善来建立触发工具。随后,通过分析2019年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间抗真菌药物使用者的医院记录来评估触发工具的有效性。检查每个触发信号与ADEs发生之间的相关性,并通过自发报告系统(SRS)和全球触发工具(GTT)评估触发工具的敏感性和特异性。此外,还分析了抗真菌药物使用导致的药物不良事件(ADEs)的危险因素。结果:经过一轮专家咨询,21个初步触发工具被提炼为21个最终触发工具。在回顾性分析中,阳性触发率为65.83%,阳性预测值(PPV)为28.75%。住院患者中ADEs的发生率为28.75%,相当于每100次入院发生44.58例ADEs,每1000个患者日发生33.04例ADEs。主要的ADEs类别包括代谢紊乱、胃肠道损伤和皮疹。ADEs严重程度分为1级36例、2级160例和3级18例。住院时间越长、阳性触发工具越多、合并症数量越多,发生ADEs的可能性就越大。

结论

本研究强调了GTT在提高抗真菌药物使用期间ADEs检测方面的有效性,从而证实了其作为监测工具的价值。

相似文献

1
Active monitoring of antifungal adverse events in hospitalized patients based on Global Trigger Tool method.基于全球触发工具法对住院患者抗真菌不良事件进行主动监测。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 28;15:1322587. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1322587. eCollection 2024.
2
Establishing a trigger tool based on global trigger tools to identify adverse drug events in obstetric inpatients in China.建立基于全球触发工具的触发工具,以识别中国产科住院患者的药物不良事件。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 15;24(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10449-z.
3
Establishment of a pediatric trigger tool based on Global Trigger Tool to identify adverse drug events of children: experience in a Chinese hospital.基于全球触发工具建立儿科触发工具以识别儿童药物不良事件:一家中国医院的经验
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02354-9.
4
The application of Global Trigger Tool in monitoring antineoplastic adverse drug events: a retrospective study.全球触发工具在监测抗肿瘤药物不良事件中的应用:一项回顾性研究。
Front Oncol. 2024 May 8;14:1230514. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1230514. eCollection 2024.
5
Validating the Chinese geriatric trigger tool and analyzing adverse drug event associated risk factors in elderly Chinese patients: A retrospective review.验证中文老年触发工具并分析老年中国患者药物不良事件相关风险因素:回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232095. eCollection 2020.
6
Adverse drug events in Chinese elder inpatients: a retrospective review for evaluating the efficiency of the Global Trigger Tool.中国老年住院患者的药物不良事件:一项评估全球触发工具有效性的回顾性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 28;10:1232334. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1232334. eCollection 2023.
7
Performance of the adverse drug event trigger tool and the global trigger tool for identifying adverse drug events: experience in a Belgian hospital.不良药物事件触发工具和全球触发工具在识别不良药物事件中的性能:比利时一家医院的经验。
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Nov;47(11):1414-9. doi: 10.1177/1060028013500939.
8
Development of a trigger tool for the detection of adverse drug events in Chinese geriatric inpatients using the Delphi method.采用德尔菲法开发用于检测中国老年住院患者药物不良事件的触发工具。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Oct;41(5):1174-1183. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00871-x. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
9
Validating a Trigger Tool for Detecting Adverse Drug Events in Elderly Patients With Multimorbidity (TRIGGER-CHRON).验证一种用于检测患有多种疾病的老年患者药物不良事件的触发工具(TRIGGER-CHRON)。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e976-e982. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000552.
10
Utility of a trigger tool (TRIGGER-CHRON) to detect adverse events associated with high-alert medications in patients with multimorbidity.一种触发工具(TRIGGER-CHRON)在患有多种疾病的患者中检测与高警示药物相关的不良事件的效用。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e41-e46. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002126. Epub 2020 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Application and evaluation of the global trigger tool approach to adverse drug event monitoring in the high-risk elderly inpatients with multiple chronic diseases.全球触发工具方法在患有多种慢性病的高危老年住院患者药物不良事件监测中的应用与评估
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 20;16:1594176. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1594176. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Global trigger tool as a medication safety tool for adverse drug event detection-a cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital.评价全球触发工具作为一种药物安全工具,用于检测不良药物事件——一项在一家三级医院进行的横断面研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 May;79(5):617-625. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03469-5. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
2
Incidence and patterns of adverse drug reactions among adult patients hospitalized in the University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital: A prospective observational follow-up study.在贡德尔大学综合专科医院住院的成年患者中药物不良反应的发生率和模式:一项前瞻性观察随访研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282096. eCollection 2023.
3
Adverse drug events and contributing factors among pediatric cancer patients at Jimma University medical center, Southwest Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚西南部的季马大学医学中心,儿科癌症患者的药物不良反应和促成因素。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Feb 13;23(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-03891-9.
4
Safety of triazole antifungals: a pharmacovigilance study from 2004 to 2021 based on FAERS.三唑类抗真菌药物的安全性:一项基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的2004年至2021年药物警戒研究。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2022 Dec 16;13:20420986221143266. doi: 10.1177/20420986221143266. eCollection 2022.
5
Evaluation of Factors Associated with Adverse Drug Events in South Korea Using a Population-Based Database.利用基于人群的数据库评估韩国药物不良事件相关因素。
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 23;11(21):6248. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216248.
6
Predicting adverse drug events in older inpatients: a machine learning study.预测老年住院患者的药物不良事件:一项机器学习研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Dec;44(6):1304-1311. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01468-7. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
7
Thalidomide and steroid in the management of erythema nodosum leprosum.沙利度胺联合类固醇治疗结节性红斑型麻风。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2022 May-Jun;54(3):177-182. doi: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_946_21.
8
An evaluation of trigger tool method for adverse drug reaction monitoring at a tertiary care teaching hospital.一家三级护理教学医院对用于药物不良反应监测的触发工具方法的评估。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2022 Jan-Feb;54(1):19-23. doi: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_764_20.
9
Development and Implementation of an e-Trigger Tool for Adverse Drug Events in a Swiss University Hospital.瑞士大学医院药物不良事件电子触发工具的开发与实施
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 24;13:251-263. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S334987. eCollection 2021.
10
How to use the Delphi method to aid in decision making and build consensus in pharmacy education.如何运用德尔菲法辅助药学教育中的决策制定并达成共识。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Oct;13(10):1376-1385. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.07.018. Epub 2021 Aug 4.