College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, National Academy of Agriculture Green Development, Key Laboratory of Plant-Soil Interactions, Ministry of Education, National Observation and Research Station of Agriculture Green Development (Quzhou, Hebei), China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
School of Chemistry, The University of Edinburgh, Joseph Black Building, David Brewster Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3FJ, UK.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(38):57190-57203. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19780-0. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
While intensive peach production has expanded rapidly in recent years, few studies have explored the environmental impacts associated with specific regional systems or the optimal management strategies to minimize associated environmental risks. Here, data from a survey of 290 native farmers were used to conduct a life cycle assessment to quantify the acidification potential (AP), global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), and reactive nitrogen (Nr) losses in peach production in Pinggu District, Beijing. Total annual Nr losses, and GWP, AP, and EP values for peach production in Pinggu District were respectively 10.7 kg N t, 857 kg CO-eq t, 12.9 kg SO-eq t, and 4.1 kg PO-eq t. The principal driving factors were fertilizer production, transportation, and application, which together accounted for 94%, 67%, 75%, and 94% of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP, respectively. In the high yield, high nitrogen-use efficiency (HH) group, relative values of Nr losses, GWP, AP, and EP were respectively 33%, 25%, 39%, and 32% lower than the overall averages for 290 orchards. Further analyses indicate that improved farming practices such as decreasing application rates of fertilizers, increasing proportion of base fertilization rate, and proper fertilization frequency in the HH group were the main reasons for these orchards' better performance in peach yields and partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer, and their reduced environmental impacts. These results highlight the need to optimize nutrient management in peach production in order simultaneously to realize both environmental sustainability and high productivity in the peach production system.
近年来,密集型桃树生产迅速扩张,但很少有研究探讨与特定区域系统相关的环境影响,也很少有研究探讨实现环境风险最小化的最佳管理策略。在这里,利用对 290 位本地果农的调查数据,通过生命周期评估量化了北京市平谷区桃树生产的酸化潜力(AP)、全球变暖潜能(GWP)、富营养化潜力(EP)和活性氮(Nr)损失。平谷区桃树生产的年总 Nr 损失以及 GWP、AP 和 EP 值分别为 10.7kgNt、857kgCO2-eqt、12.9kgSO2-eqt 和 4.1kgPO4-eqt。主要驱动因素是肥料的生产、运输和应用,这三者共同造成了 Nr 损失、GWP、AP 和 EP 的 94%、67%、75%和 94%。在高产量、高氮利用效率(HH)组中,Nr 损失、GWP、AP 和 EP 的相对值分别比 290 个果园的平均值低 33%、25%、39%和 32%。进一步的分析表明,HH 组中减少肥料施用量、增加基肥比例和适当施肥频率等改进的耕作措施是这些果园在桃树产量和氮肥部分生产力方面表现更好、环境影响更小的主要原因。这些结果强调了需要优化桃树生产中的养分管理,以实现桃生产系统的环境可持续性和高生产力。