College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F, Yangling 712100, China.
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Apr 15;869:161791. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161791. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
Although the repaid development of China's apple industry heavily depends on excessive fertilizer-water-pesticide (FWP) inputs, little information is available that systematically evaluates environmental impacts, mitigation potential, and economical benefits of apple production systems in China. In this study, life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to elucidate environmental risks and mitigation potentials of rain-fed and irrigated apple production systems on China's Loess Plateau based on survey data from 847 farmers, and economic benefits were analyzed simultaneously. Results showed that irrigated orchards caused more severe environmental risks associated with energy depletion (ED), global warming potential (GWP) and acidification potential (AP) than those in rain-fed orchards, whereas an opposite was true for eutrophication potential (EP), human toxicity potential (HTP), aquatic toxicity potential (ATP) and soil toxicity potential (STP). ED and GWP occurred primarily in the agricultural material stage, while AP, EP, HTP, ATP, and STP occurred mostly in the orchard management stage. Optimized FWP management can markedly mitigate environmental impacts in both irrigated and rain-fed orchard systems. Synthetic fertilizer, because of production and field-associated emissions, was the greatest contributor to environmental impacts of an apple production system. An environmental pollution index (EPI) that integrated environmental categories was highest in conventional irrigated orchards (0.946), followed by conventional rainfed orchards (0.857), and optimized irrigated orchards (0.459), and the lowest EPI was in optimized rainfed orchards (0.389). Economic analysis revealed that the benefits of rainfed orchards were higher than those of irrigated orchards because of higher apple prices and lower labor costs. Optimized FWP management sharply decreased input costs, thereby substantially increasing net income in irrigated and rain-fed apple orchards. Overall, severe environmental risk and large mitigation potential co-exist in rain-fed and irrigated apple orchards on China's Loess Plateau. Integrated soil-crop-market management potentially exhibited considerable environmental and economic advantages, thereby efficiently developing high-quality apple production.
虽然中国苹果产业的快速发展严重依赖于过度的化肥-水-农药(FWP)投入,但对于系统评估中国苹果生产系统的环境影响、缓解潜力和经济效益的信息却很少。本研究基于对中国黄土高原 847 位果农的调查数据,采用生命周期评价(LCA)方法,阐明了雨养和灌溉苹果生产系统的环境风险和缓解潜力,并同时分析了经济效益。结果表明,与雨养果园相比,灌溉果园会导致更严重的与能源消耗(ED)、全球变暖潜能(GWP)和酸化潜能(AP)相关的环境风险,而对于富营养化潜能(EP)、人类毒性潜能(HTP)、水生毒性潜能(ATP)和土壤毒性潜能(STP)则相反。ED 和 GWP 主要发生在农业物料阶段,而 AP、EP、HTP、ATP 和 STP 主要发生在果园管理阶段。优化的 FWP 管理可以显著减轻灌溉和雨养果园系统的环境影响。由于生产和田间排放,合成肥料是苹果生产系统环境影响的最大贡献者。综合环境类别的环境污染指数(EPI)在传统灌溉果园中最高(0.946),其次是传统雨养果园(0.857),优化灌溉果园(0.459),最低的 EPI 是优化雨养果园(0.389)。经济分析表明,由于苹果价格较高和劳动力成本较低,雨养果园的效益高于灌溉果园。优化的 FWP 管理大大降低了投入成本,从而显著增加了灌溉和雨养苹果果园的净收入。总体而言,中国黄土高原雨养和灌溉苹果园既存在严重的环境风险,又具有巨大的缓解潜力。综合土壤-作物-市场管理可能具有相当大的环境和经济优势,从而有效地发展优质苹果生产。