Department of Psychology, University of Southern California.
Psychol Sci. 2022 Apr;33(4):563-578. doi: 10.1177/09567976211045345. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
Habits underlie much of human behavior. However, people may prefer agentic accounts that overlook habits in favor of inner states, such as mood. We tested this misattribution hypothesis in an online experiment of helping behavior ( = 809 adults) as well as in an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study of U.S. college students' everyday coffee drinking ( = 112). Both studies revealed a substantial gap between perceived and actual drivers of behavior: Habit strength outperformed or matched inner states in predicting behavior, but participants' explanations of their behavior emphasized inner states. Participants continued to misattribute habits to inner states when incentivized for accuracy and when explaining other people's behavior. We discuss how this misperception could adversely influence self-regulation.
习惯是人类行为的主要基础。然而,人们可能更倾向于忽视习惯的代理理论,而偏爱内在状态,如情绪。我们通过在线帮助行为实验(=809 名成年人)和美国大学生日常喝咖啡的生态瞬间评估(EMA)研究(=112 名)来检验这种归因错误假设。这两项研究都揭示了行为的感知驱动因素和实际驱动因素之间存在显著差距:习惯强度在预测行为方面优于或与内在状态相匹配,但参与者对自己行为的解释强调内在状态。当参与者因准确性而受到激励或解释他人行为时,他们仍然会将习惯错误地归因于内在状态。我们讨论了这种误解如何对自我调节产生不利影响。