Pimm Rosemary, Vandelanotte Corneel, Rhodes Ryan E, Short Camille, Duncan Mitch J, Rebar Amanda L
a School of Human, Health, and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University.
b Behavioral Medicine Laboratory, University of Victoria.
Behav Med. 2016 Oct-Dec;42(4):248-53. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2015.1017549. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
Physical activity is partly regulated by automatic processes such as habits (ie, well-learned responses to cues), but it remains unclear what cues trigger these processes. This study examined the relations of physical activity automaticity and behavior with the consistency of people, activity, routine, location, time, and mood cues present upon initiation of physical activity behavior. Australian adults (N = 1,244, 627 female, M age = 55 years) reported their physical activity automaticity, behavior, and the degree of consistency of these cues each time they start a physical activity behavior. Multiple regression models, which accounted for gender and age, revealed that more consistent routine and mood cues were linked to more physical activity automaticity; whereas more consistent time and people cues were linked to more physical activity behavior. Interventions may more effectively translate into long-lasting physical activity habits if they draw people's attention to the salient cues of time, people, routine, and mood.
身体活动部分受习惯等自动过程调节（即对线索的熟练反应），但尚不清楚哪些线索触发这些过程。本研究考察了身体活动自主性和行为与身体活动行为开始时出现的人、活动、日常、地点、时间和情绪线索的一致性之间的关系。澳大利亚成年人（N = 1244，女性627名，年龄中位数 = 55岁）报告了他们每次开始身体活动行为时的身体活动自主性、行为以及这些线索的一致程度。考虑了性别和年龄的多元回归模型显示，更一致的日常和情绪线索与更高的身体活动自主性相关；而更一致的时间和人线索与更多的身体活动行为相关。如果干预措施能让人们关注时间、人、日常和情绪的显著线索，可能会更有效地转化为持久的身体活动习惯。
