Meki Moustafa, El-Baz Ayman, Sethu Palaniappan, Giridharan Guruprasad
Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Cells Tissues Organs. 2023;212(3):272-284. doi: 10.1159/000524317. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
Continuous flow ventricular assist device (CFVAD) support in advanced heart failure patients causes diminished pulsatility, which has been associated with adverse events including gastrointestinal bleeding, end organ failure, and arteriovenous malformation. Recently, pulsatility augmentation by pump speed modulation has been proposed as a means to minimize adverse events. Pulsatility primarily affects endothelial and smooth muscle cells in the vasculature. To study the effects of pulsatility and pulse modulation using CFVADs, we have developed a microfluidic co-culture model with human aortic endothelial (ECs) and smooth muscle cells (SMCs) that can replicate physiologic pressures, flows, shear stresses, and cyclical stretch. The effects of pulsatility and pulse frequency on ECs and SMCs were evaluated during (1) normal pulsatile flow (120/80 mmHg, 60 bpm), (2) diminished pulsatility (98/92 mmHg, 60 bpm), and (3) low cyclical frequency (115/80 mmHg, 30 bpm). Shear stresses were estimated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. While average shear stresses (4.2 dynes/cm2) and flows (10.1 mL/min) were similar, the peak shear stresses for normal pulsatile flow (16.9 dynes/cm2) and low cyclic frequency (19.5 dynes/cm2) were higher compared to diminished pulsatility (6.45 dynes/cm2). ECs and SMCs demonstrated significantly lower cell size with diminished pulsatility compared to normal pulsatile flow. Low cyclical frequency resulted in normalization of EC cell size but not SMCs. SMCs size was higher with low frequency condition compared to diminished pulsatility but did not normalize to normal pulsatility condition. These results may suggest that pressure amplitude augmentation may have a greater effect in normalizing ECs, while both pressure amplitude and frequency may be required to normalize SMCs morphology. The co-culture model may be an ideal platform to study flow modulation strategies.
晚期心力衰竭患者使用连续流心室辅助装置(CFVAD)支持会导致搏动性减弱,这与包括胃肠道出血、终末器官衰竭和动静脉畸形在内的不良事件相关。最近,有人提出通过泵速调节来增强搏动性,以此作为将不良事件降至最低的一种手段。搏动性主要影响血管系统中的内皮细胞和平滑肌细胞。为了研究使用CFVAD时搏动性和脉冲调制的影响,我们开发了一种微流控共培养模型,该模型包含人主动脉内皮细胞(ECs)和平滑肌细胞(SMCs),能够复制生理压力、流量、剪切应力和周期性拉伸。在以下三种情况下评估了搏动性和脉冲频率对ECs和SMCs的影响:(1)正常搏动血流(120/80 mmHg,60次/分钟),(2)搏动性减弱(98/92 mmHg,60次/分钟),以及(3)低循环频率(115/80 mmHg,30次/分钟)。使用计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟估算剪切应力。虽然平均剪切应力(4.2达因/平方厘米)和流量(10.1毫升/分钟)相似,但与搏动性减弱(6.45达因/平方厘米)相比,正常搏动血流(16.9达因/平方厘米)和低循环频率(19.5达因/平方厘米)的峰值剪切应力更高。与正常搏动血流相比,搏动性减弱时ECs和SMCs的细胞大小显著降低。低循环频率使EC细胞大小恢复正常,但SMCs未恢复正常。与搏动性减弱相比,低频条件下SMCs大小更高,但未恢复到正常搏动性条件下的大小。这些结果可能表明,压力幅度增加可能对使ECs恢复正常有更大作用,而可能需要压力幅度和频率两者来使SMCs形态恢复正常。共培养模型可能是研究血流调节策略的理想平台。