Suppr超能文献

连续性血流左心室辅助装置桥接患者的主动脉血管僵硬的动态变化。

Dynamic Changes in Aortic Vascular Stiffness in Patients Bridged to Transplant With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.

Department of Bioengineering, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado; Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.

出版信息

JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Jun;5(6):449-459. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to measure aortic vascular stiffness from orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) patients exposed to varying types of flow as a result of the presence or absence of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support pre-OHT.

BACKGROUND

The effects of continuous-flow LVADs (CF-LVADs) on vascular properties are unknown, but may contribute to the pathophysiology of CF-LVAD complications such as stroke, hypertension, and bleeding.

METHODS

Echocardiograms were reviewed from 172 OHT patients immediately before LVAD and at 3 time points post-OHT: baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. For each study, pulse pressure and aortic end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions were used to calculate aortic strain, distensibility, and stiffness index. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on the presence or absence of a LVAD and a pulse pre-OHT: No LVAD (n = 111), LVAD No Pulse (n = 30), and LVAD With Pulse (n = 31).

RESULTS

The aortic stiffness index among LVAD No Pulse patients increased from 2.8 ± 1.1 pre-CF-LVAD to 10.9 ± 4.7 immediately post-OHT (p < 0.001). This aortic stiffness index was also significantly higher compared with No LVAD (3.4 ± 1.1; p < 0.001) and LVAD With Pulse (3.7 ± 1.4; p < 0.001) immediately post-OHT with attenuation of these differences by 1 year post-OHT. Similar findings were noted for the other indices of aortic stiffness.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic stiffness is markedly increased immediately post-OHT among patients bridged with CF-LVADs, with attenuation of this increased stiffness over the first year after transplant. These results suggest that aortic vascular properties are dynamic and may be influenced by alterations in flow pulsatility. As more patients are supported with CF-LVADs and as newer pump technology attempts to modulate pulsatility, further research examining the role of alterations in flow patterns on vascular function and the potential resultant systemic sequelae are needed.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在测量因左心室辅助装置(LVAD)支持而存在或不存在的原位心脏移植(OHT)患者的主动脉血管僵硬程度,这些患者的血流类型各不相同。

背景

连续血流 LVAD(CF-LVAD)对血管特性的影响尚不清楚,但可能导致 CF-LVAD 并发症的病理生理学,如中风、高血压和出血。

方法

对 172 例 OHT 患者的超声心动图进行了回顾,这些患者在 LVAD 前和 OHT 后 3 个时间点进行了检查:基线、6 个月和 1 年。对于每个研究,使用脉压和主动脉收缩末期和舒张末期尺寸来计算主动脉应变、可扩张性和僵硬指数。根据患者 LVAD 的存在与否和术前脉搏情况将患者分为 3 组:无 LVAD(n=111)、LVAD 无脉搏(n=30)和 LVAD 有脉搏(n=31)。

结果

LVAD 无脉搏患者的主动脉僵硬指数从 CF-LVAD 前的 2.8±1.1 增加到 OHT 后即刻的 10.9±4.7(p<0.001)。与无 LVAD(3.4±1.1;p<0.001)和 OHT 后即刻的 LVAD 有脉搏(3.7±1.4;p<0.001)相比,该主动脉僵硬指数也显著更高,而这些差异在 OHT 后 1 年得到了缓解。主动脉僵硬的其他指标也有类似的发现。

结论

在使用 CF-LVAD 桥接的患者中,OHT 后即刻的主动脉僵硬程度明显增加,而在移植后 1 年内,这种僵硬程度会减弱。这些结果表明,主动脉血管特性是动态的,可能会受到血流脉动变化的影响。随着越来越多的患者接受 CF-LVAD 支持,以及更新的泵技术试图调节脉动性,需要进一步研究改变血流模式对血管功能的作用以及可能产生的全身后果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验