Singh Chitrangada, Juette Arne
Radiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, GBR.
Radiology, Ipswich Hospital, East Suffolk and North Essex Foundation Trust, Ipswich, GBR.
Cureus. 2022 Feb 20;14(2):e22402. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22402. eCollection 2022 Feb.
The aim of this report is to evaluate the impact of the percutaneous ultrasound-guided placement of wireless radio-frequency identifier devices (RFIDs; Hologic LOCalizer, Marlborough, Massachusett) and its impact in our practice of preoperative localisation of biopsy-proven breast cancers, post-vacuum assisted biopsy-site hematoma, and lymph nodes for targeted dissection pre-operatively. A single institutional retrospective analysis of RFID usage for preoperative localisation in screening and symptomatic patients with non-palpable biopsy-proven breast carcinoma was reviewed from the radiology information system at our tertiary breast imaging unit. Its impact on the radiological and surgical team practice was reviewed, including the number of appointments, the interval between scheduling image-guided localisation and intraoperative localisation, procedure failure, average deployment, and surgical time. Feedback from surgeons and pathologists practice was also taken into consideration. Fifty-nine RFID clips were placed for wireless localisation of breast cancers, lymph nodes, and post-vacuum-assisted biopsy hematoma over nine months. Seventy-three per cent (73%; n=43/59) of RFID devices were placed in biopsy-proven carcinomas under direct ultrasound guidance. The learning curve was small, as the delivery system was similar to the commonly used localisation clips. The pilot process involved RFID with radioisotope injections for the breast mass for the initial 28% (n=12 /43) cases, which were gradually transitioned into RFID only. Radioisotope was used for sentinel node purposes if required. For targeted node dissection, 3% (n=2/59) patients received RFID for biopsy-proven metastatic node localisation, with one of two with adjunct radioisotope injection. Post-vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) hematoma was localised in 24% (n=14/59) cases, four of which received adjunct radioisotope in the pilot phase. The average procedure time for RFID deployment was five minutes. The average time for surgery was 20 minutes. 1.6% (n=1/59) incidence of RFID slipping from the surface of the site through surgical exposure attributed to the superficial and immediate pre-operative placement of the RFID. This was salvageable with adjunct radioisotope injection within the pilot phase. There were no incidences of repeat localisation or repeat exploration surgeries. Planned pre-operative localisation with RFID allows for better planning and less pressured service delivery and a success rate of 98-99%. This ultimately avoids lost theatre time and patient demotivation. Surgeons have reported excellent intra-operative detectability in their approach. There has been no difficulty in the detection of the RFID within the surgical cavity despite hematoma. RFID localisers are expensive compared to our usual practice of radioisotope injection but this can be recuperated through uncoupled tariffs like gain in slots of one-stop clinics, flexibility for placement, and avoiding lost theatre time, as these can be placed up to 30 days before surgery.
本报告旨在评估经皮超声引导下放置无线射频识别设备(RFID;Hologic定位器,马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒)及其在我们对活检证实的乳腺癌进行术前定位、真空辅助活检后血肿定位以及术前靶向清扫淋巴结的实践中的影响。对我们三级乳腺影像科放射学信息系统中,用于对筛查及有症状的、活检证实为不可触及乳腺癌患者进行术前定位的RFID使用情况进行了单机构回顾性分析。评估了其对放射科和外科团队实践的影响,包括预约次数、安排图像引导定位与术中定位之间的间隔、操作失败情况、平均放置时间以及手术时间。同时也考虑了外科医生和病理科医生的反馈。在九个月的时间里,共放置了59个RFID夹子用于乳腺癌、淋巴结以及真空辅助活检后血肿的无线定位。73%(n = 43/59)的RFID设备是在直接超声引导下放置于活检证实的癌灶中。由于输送系统与常用的定位夹子相似,学习曲线较平缓。在最初28%(n = 12/43)的病例中,试点过程涉及将RFID与放射性同位素注射用于乳腺肿块定位,随后逐渐过渡到仅使用RFID。如有需要,放射性同位素用于前哨淋巴结定位。对于靶向淋巴结清扫术,3%(n = 2/59)的患者接受RFID用于活检证实的转移淋巴结定位,其中两例中有一例同时进行了放射性同位素注射。24%(n = 14/59)的病例对真空辅助活检(VAB)后血肿进行了定位,其中四例在试点阶段接受了辅助放射性同位素注射。RFID放置的平均操作时间为5分钟。平均手术时间为20分钟。1.6%(n = 1/59)的病例中,由于RFID在术前放置位置表浅且紧邻手术部位,导致其在手术暴露过程中从放置部位表面滑落。在试点阶段通过辅助放射性同位素注射可补救此情况。没有重复定位或重复探查手术的情况发生。使用RFID进行计划中的术前定位可实现更好的规划,减少服务压力,成功率为98 - 99%。这最终避免了手术时间的浪费和患者的积极性受挫。外科医生报告称在手术过程中对其探测效果极佳。尽管存在血肿,在手术腔隙内检测RFID并无困难。与我们通常使用放射性同位素注射的做法相比,RFID定位器较为昂贵,但这可以通过诸如增加一站式诊所的就诊时段、放置的灵活性以及避免手术时间浪费等非关联费用来弥补,因为这些定位器可在手术前30天内放置。