• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监管消费场所可通过避免使用急救服务来节省成本:一项成本分析研究。

Supervised consumption site enables cost savings by avoiding emergency services: a cost analysis study.

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, TRW Building, 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.

Community Health Sciences, Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, TRW Building, 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.

出版信息

Harm Reduct J. 2022 Mar 28;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00609-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12954-022-00609-5
PMID:35346223
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8959556/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We report on a cost analysis study, using population level data to determine the emergency service costs avoided from emergency overdose management at supervised consumption services (SCS).

DESIGN

We completed a cost analysis from a payer's perspective. In this setting, there is a single-payer model of service delivery.

SETTING

In Calgary, Canada, 'Safeworks Harm Reduction Program' was established in late 2017 and offers 24/7 access to SCS. The facility is a nurse-led service, available for client drop-in. We conducted a cost analysis for the entire duration of the program from November 2017 to January 2020, a period of 2 years and 3 months.

METHODS

We assessed costs using the following factors from government health databases: monthly operational costs of providing services for drug consumption, cost of providing ambulance pre-hospital care for clients with overdoses who could not be revived at the facility, cost of initial treatment in an emergency department, and benefit of costs averted from overdoses that were successfully managed at the SCS.

RESULTS

The proportion of clients who have overdosed at the SCS has decreased steadily for the duration of the program. The number of overdoses that can be managed on site at the SCS has trended upward, currently 98%. Each overdose that is managed at the SCS produces approximately $1600 CAD in cost savings, with a savings of over $2.3 million for the lifetime of the program.

CONCLUSION

Overdose management at an SCS creates cost savings by offsetting costs required for managing overdoses using emergency department and pre-hospital ambulance services.

摘要

背景和目的

我们报告了一项成本分析研究,使用人群水平数据来确定从监督吸毒服务(SCS)进行紧急药物过量管理中避免的紧急服务成本。

设计

我们从支付者的角度完成了成本分析。在这种情况下,存在服务提供的单一支付者模式。

设置

在加拿大卡尔加里,“Safeworks 减少伤害计划”于 2017 年末成立,提供 24/7 进入 SCS 的服务。该设施是一个由护士领导的服务,可以为客户随时提供服务。我们对整个计划的全部期间(2017 年 11 月至 2020 年 1 月)进行了成本分析,为期 2 年零 3 个月。

方法

我们使用政府健康数据库中的以下因素评估成本:提供吸毒服务的每月运营成本、无法在设施中复苏的过量吸毒者提供救护车院前护理的成本、在急诊室进行初始治疗的成本以及通过在 SCS 成功管理过量吸毒而节省的成本效益。

结果

在整个计划期间,到 SCS 药物过量的客户比例稳步下降。可以在 SCS 现场管理的过量数量呈上升趋势,目前为 98%。在 SCS 管理的每个过量都会产生大约 1600 加元 CAD 的成本节省,该计划的生命周期内节省超过 230 万加元。

结论

通过抵消使用急诊室和院前救护车服务管理过量所需的成本,SCS 上的药物过量管理会产生成本节约。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5e/8962170/bf0b7b3ad218/12954_2022_609_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5e/8962170/bf0b7b3ad218/12954_2022_609_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a5e/8962170/bf0b7b3ad218/12954_2022_609_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Supervised consumption site enables cost savings by avoiding emergency services: a cost analysis study.监管消费场所可通过避免使用急救服务来节省成本:一项成本分析研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Mar 28;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00609-5.
2
The estimated costs and benefits of a hypothetical supervised consumption site in Providence, Rhode Island.罗德岛州普罗维登斯市假设监督消费场所的成本效益估算。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Oct;108:103820. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103820. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
3
The projected costs and benefits of a supervised injection facility in Seattle, WA, USA.美国华盛顿州西雅图市监管注射设施的预计成本和收益。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 May;67:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
4
Mobile supervised consumption services in Rural British Columbia: lessons learned.不列颠哥伦比亚省农村地区的移动监督消费服务:经验教训。
Harm Reduct J. 2019 Jan 10;16(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12954-018-0273-3.
5
Estimated impact of supervised injection facilities on overdose fatalities and healthcare costs in New York City.纽约市监督注射设施对过量用药死亡和医疗保健费用的估计影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Nov;106:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
6
Perspectives of key interest groups regarding supervised Consumption sites (SCS) and novel virtual harm reduction services / overdose response hotlines and applications: a qualitative Canadian study.关键利益相关群体对监督消费场所 (SCS) 和新型虚拟减少伤害服务/ 过量反应热线和应用的看法:一项加拿大定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jul 27;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01053-3.
7
Opening Canada's first Health Canada-approved supervised consumption sites.开设加拿大首个经加拿大卫生部批准的监管吸食中心。
Can J Public Health. 2018 Aug;109(4):581-584. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0107-9. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
8
Changing risk and presentation of overdose associated with consumption of street drugs at a supervised injection site in Vancouver, Canada.改变与在加拿大温哥华监督注射点使用街头毒品相关的过量风险和表现。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Mar 1;196:46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.12.016. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
9
Changes in supervised consumption site use and emergency interventions in Montréal, Canada in the first twelve months of the COVID-19 pandemic: An interrupted time series study.《COVID-19 大流行的头 12 个月中加拿大蒙特利尔监督消费场所使用和紧急干预措施的变化:一项中断时间序列研究》。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Dec;110:103894. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103894. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
10
Client experiences using a new supervised consumption service in Sudbury, Ontario: A qualitative study.安大略省萨德伯里市新开设的监督消费服务的客户体验:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 16;18(10):e0292862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292862. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Physician perspectives on reducing harm and supporting emergency department patients who use drugs.医生对减少伤害及支持急诊科吸毒患者的看法。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 16;20(7):e0327899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327899. eCollection 2025.
2
"Oh, Another Overdose, for the Love of Pete": First Responder Perspectives on Overdose Response Technology.“哦,天哪,又一次过量用药事件”:急救人员对过量用药应对技术的看法
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 12;26(3):588-599. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18471.
3
Harm Reduction as a Form of 'Wrap-Around' Care: The Nursing Role.

本文引用的文献

1
Supervised consumption sites: a nuanced assessment of the causal evidence.监督消费场所:因果证据的细致评估。
Addiction. 2019 Dec;114(12):2109-2115. doi: 10.1111/add.14747. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
2
Mitigating the heroin crisis in Baltimore, MD, USA: a cost-benefit analysis of a hypothetical supervised injection facility.减轻美国马里兰州巴尔的摩市的海洛因危机:对一个假设的监督注射设施的成本效益分析。
Harm Reduct J. 2017 May 12;14(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0153-2.
3
Potential cost-effectiveness of supervised injection facilities in Toronto and Ottawa, Canada.
减少伤害作为一种“全方位”护理形式:护理角色。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;34(1):e13436. doi: 10.1111/inm.13436. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
4
Overdose prevention centres as spaces of safety, trust and inclusion: A causal pathway based on a realist review.过量预防中心作为安全、信任和包容的空间:基于现实主义审查的因果途径。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2024 Sep;43(6):1573-1591. doi: 10.1111/dar.13908. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
5
Navigating the nexus between British Columbia's public consumption and decriminalization policies of illegal drugs.探索不列颠哥伦比亚省公共消费与非法药物非刑罪化政策之间的关联。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 May 23;22(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01150-6.
6
Economic Evaluations of Establishing Opioid Overdose Prevention Centers in 12 North American Cities: A Systematic Review.在 12 个北美城市建立阿片类药物过量预防中心的经济评估:系统评价。
Value Health. 2024 May;27(5):655-669. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.02.004. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
7
Preference for hotline versus mobile application/countdown-based mobile overdose response services: a qualitative study.对热线与移动应用程序/基于倒计时的过量用药应对服务的偏好:一项定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Feb 5;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00944-9.
8
Understanding the barriers and facilitators to implementing and sustaining Mobile Overdose Response Services from the perspective of Canadian key interest groups: a qualitative study.从加拿大主要利益相关者的角度理解实施和维持移动药物过量反应服务的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Feb 2;21(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00946-7.
9
Flawed reports can harm: the case of supervised consumption services in Alberta.有缺陷的报告可能会造成危害:以艾伯塔省的监督消费服务为例。
Can J Public Health. 2023 Dec;114(6):928-933. doi: 10.17269/s41997-023-00825-x. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
10
A cost benefit analysis of a virtual overdose monitoring service/mobile overdose response service: the national overdose response service.一种虚拟药物过量监测服务/移动药物过量反应服务的成本效益分析:国家药物过量反应服务。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Oct 4;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00565-8.
加拿大多伦多和渥太华监督注射设施的潜在成本效益。
Addiction. 2016 Mar;111(3):475-89. doi: 10.1111/add.13195. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
4
A cost-benefit/cost-effectiveness analysis of an unsanctioned supervised smoking facility in the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver, Canada.加拿大温哥华市中心东区一家未经批准的受监管吸烟设施的成本效益/成本效果分析。
Harm Reduct J. 2014 Nov 13;11(1):30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-11-30.
5
A cost-benefit/cost-effectiveness analysis of proposed supervised injection facilities in Ottawa, Canada.对加拿大渥太华提议设立的受监管注射设施进行成本效益/成本效果分析。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014 Aug 4;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-9-31.
6
Reduction in overdose mortality after the opening of North America's first medically supervised safer injecting facility: a retrospective population-based study.北美洲首家医疗监督下更安全注射室开设后,过量用药死亡人数减少:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1429-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62353-7. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
7
Is Vancouver Canada's supervised injection facility cost-saving?加拿大温哥华的监管注射室是否节省成本?
Addiction. 2010 Aug;105(8):1429-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02977.x.
8
A cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of Vancouver's supervised injection facility.温哥华监督注射设施的成本效益和成本效果分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2010 Jan;21(1):70-6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.03.004. Epub 2009 May 6.
9
The cost-effectiveness of Vancouver's supervised injection facility.温哥华受监管注射设施的成本效益。
CMAJ. 2008 Nov 18;179(11):1143-51. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080808.
10
Emergency department satisfaction: what matters most?急诊科满意度:最重要的是什么?
Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Mar;22(3):586-91. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81947-x.