• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罗德岛州普罗维登斯市假设监督消费场所的成本效益估算。

The estimated costs and benefits of a hypothetical supervised consumption site in Providence, Rhode Island.

机构信息

Drug Overdose Surveillance Program, Rhode Island Department of Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Drug Overdose Surveillance Program, Rhode Island Department of Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Oct;108:103820. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103820. Epub 2022 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103820
PMID:35973341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10131249/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Overdose deaths have increased dramatically in the United States, including in Rhode Island. In July 2021, the Rhode Island government passed legislation supporting a two-year pilot program authorizing supervised consumption sites (SCSs) in response to this crisis. We estimated the costs and benefits of a hypothetical SCS in Providence, Rhode Island.

METHODS

We utilized a decision analytic mathematical model to compare costs and outcomes for people who inject drugs under two scenarios: (1) a SCS that includes syringe services provision, and (2) a syringe service program only (i.e., status quo). We assumed 0.95% of injections result in overdose, the SCS would serve 400 clients monthly and have a net cost of $783,899 annually, 46% of overdoses occurring outside of the SCS result in an ambulance run and 43% result in an emergency department (ED) visit, 0.79% of overdoses occurring within the SCS result in an ambulance run and ED visit, and the SCS would lead to a 25.7% reduction in fatal overdoses near the site. The model was developed from a modified societal perspective with a one-year time horizon.

RESULTS

A hypothetical SCS in Providence would prevent approximately 2 overdose deaths, 261 ambulance runs, 244 ED visits, and 117 inpatient hospitalizations for emergency overdose care annually compared to a scenario that includes a syringe service program only. The SCS would save $1,104,454 annually compared to the syringe service program only, accounting only for facility costs and short-term costs of emergency overdose care and ignoring savings associated with averted deaths. Influential parameters included the percentage of injections resulting in overdose, the total annual injections at the SCS, and the percentage of overdoses outside of the SCS that result in an ED visit.

CONCLUSION

A SCS in would result in substantial cost savings due to prevention of costly emergency overdose care.

摘要

背景

在美国,包括罗得岛在内,过量死亡人数急剧增加。2021 年 7 月,罗得岛政府通过立法,支持为期两年的试点计划,授权在该州建立监督吸毒场所(SCS),以应对这一危机。我们估计了在罗得岛普罗维登斯建立一个假设的 SCS 的成本和效益。

方法

我们利用决策分析数学模型,比较了两种情况下注射毒品者的成本和结果:(1)一个包括提供注射器服务的 SCS,(2)一个仅提供注射器服务的项目(即现状)。我们假设 0.95%的注射会导致过量,SCS 每月将服务 400 名客户,每年的净成本为 783899 美元,46%的过量发生在 SCS 之外,导致救护车出动,43%导致急诊部(ED)就诊,0.79%的过量发生在 SCS 内,导致救护车出动和 ED 就诊,SCS 将导致现场附近致命过量的减少 25.7%。该模型是从一个经过修改的社会视角出发,以一年的时间跨度开发的。

结果

与仅提供注射器服务的方案相比,在普罗维登斯建立一个假设的 SCS,每年可预防约 2 例过量死亡、261 次救护车出动、244 次 ED 就诊和 117 次因紧急过量护理而住院。与仅提供注射器服务相比,SCS 每年可节省 1104454 美元,仅包括设施成本和紧急过量护理的短期成本,忽略了与避免死亡相关的节省。有影响力的参数包括导致过量的注射百分比、SCS 每年的总注射量以及 SCS 外导致 ED 就诊的过量百分比。

结论

SCS 将导致大量的成本节约,因为它可以预防昂贵的紧急过量护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3021/10131249/db723a1ba6ab/nihms-1891058-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3021/10131249/e1c1c45a0625/nihms-1891058-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3021/10131249/db723a1ba6ab/nihms-1891058-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3021/10131249/e1c1c45a0625/nihms-1891058-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3021/10131249/db723a1ba6ab/nihms-1891058-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
The estimated costs and benefits of a hypothetical supervised consumption site in Providence, Rhode Island.罗德岛州普罗维登斯市假设监督消费场所的成本效益估算。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Oct;108:103820. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103820. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
2
Supervised consumption site enables cost savings by avoiding emergency services: a cost analysis study.监管消费场所可通过避免使用急救服务来节省成本:一项成本分析研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Mar 28;19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00609-5.
3
The projected costs and benefits of a supervised injection facility in Seattle, WA, USA.美国华盛顿州西雅图市监管注射设施的预计成本和收益。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 May;67:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
4
Comparing Projected Fatal Overdose Outcomes and Costs of Strategies to Expand Community-Based Distribution of Naloxone in Rhode Island.比较在罗德岛扩大社区美沙酮纳洛酮供应策略的预期致死性过量结局和成本。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2241174. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.41174.
5
Estimated impact of supervised injection facilities on overdose fatalities and healthcare costs in New York City.纽约市监督注射设施对过量用药死亡和医疗保健费用的估计影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Nov;106:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
6
Acceptability of safe drug consumption spaces among people who inject drugs in rural West Virginia.在西弗吉尼亚州农村地区注射毒品的人中,安全药物使用空间的可接受性。
Harm Reduct J. 2019 Aug 31;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12954-019-0320-8.
7
Can Emergency Department, Hospital Discharge, and Death Data Be Used to Monitor Burden of Drug Overdose in Rhode Island?罗德岛州的急诊科、医院出院及死亡数据能否用于监测药物过量负担?
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Sep/Oct;23(5):499-506. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000514.
8
Mitigating the heroin crisis in Baltimore, MD, USA: a cost-benefit analysis of a hypothetical supervised injection facility.减轻美国马里兰州巴尔的摩市的海洛因危机:对一个假设的监督注射设施的成本效益分析。
Harm Reduct J. 2017 May 12;14(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0153-2.
9
Modeling the cost and impact of injectable opioid agonist therapy on overdose and overdose deaths.建立模型评估注射类阿片激动剂治疗对药物过量和药物过量死亡的成本和影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Dec;143:108871. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108871. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
10
Using Timely Overdose Data to Address a Spike in Nonfatal Overdoses and Inform a Coordinated Community-Level Response in Rhode Island, 2019.利用及时的过量用药数据应对罗得岛 2019 年非致命性过量用药的激增,并为协调社区层面的应对措施提供信息。
Public Health Rep. 2021 Nov-Dec;136(1_suppl):24S-30S. doi: 10.1177/00333549211012407.

引用本文的文献

1
U.S. substance use harm reduction efforts: a review of the current state of policy, policy barriers, and recommendations.美国减少药物使用危害的努力:政策现状、政策障碍及建议综述
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Jun 8;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01238-4.
2
Investigating the spatial association between supervised consumption services and homicide rates in Toronto, Canada, 2010-2023: an ecological analysis.2010 - 2023年加拿大多伦多监督下的消费服务与凶杀率之间的空间关联调查:一项生态分析
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Feb 15;43:101022. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101022. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Harm Reduction as a Form of 'Wrap-Around' Care: The Nursing Role.减少伤害作为一种“全方位”护理形式:护理角色。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;34(1):e13436. doi: 10.1111/inm.13436. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
4
Modeling the impact of a supervised consumption site on HIV and HCV transmission among people who inject drugs in three counties in California, USA.建立模型,以评估美国加利福尼亚州三个县中的监管吸毒点对注射吸毒者中的 HIV 和 HCV 传播的影响。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Oct;132:104557. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104557. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
5
Evaluation of Strategies to Enhance Community-Based Naloxone Distribution Supported by an Opioid Settlement.评估阿片类药物和解协议支持的社区纳洛酮推广策略。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413861. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13861.
6
Economic Evaluations of Establishing Opioid Overdose Prevention Centers in 12 North American Cities: A Systematic Review.在 12 个北美城市建立阿片类药物过量预防中心的经济评估:系统评价。
Value Health. 2024 May;27(5):655-669. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.02.004. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
7
Understanding the barriers and facilitators to implementing and sustaining Mobile Overdose Response Services from the perspective of Canadian key interest groups: a qualitative study.从加拿大主要利益相关者的角度理解实施和维持移动药物过量反应服务的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Feb 2;21(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00946-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Supervised Injection Facilities as Harm Reduction: A Systematic Review.监督注射设施作为减少伤害的措施:系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Nov;61(5):738-749. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.04.017. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
2
A randomized clinical trial of a theory-based fentanyl overdose education and fentanyl test strip distribution intervention to reduce rates of opioid overdose: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项基于理论的芬太尼过量教育和芬太尼检测条分发干预以降低阿片类药物过量率的随机临床试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Nov 26;21(1):976. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04898-8.
3
Frequency of injecting among people who inject drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.注射吸毒者的注射频率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Feb;76:102619. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.102619. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
4
Estimated impact of supervised injection facilities on overdose fatalities and healthcare costs in New York City.纽约市监督注射设施对过量用药死亡和医疗保健费用的估计影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Nov;106:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
5
Supervised consumption sites: a nuanced assessment of the causal evidence.监督消费场所:因果证据的细致评估。
Addiction. 2019 Dec;114(12):2109-2115. doi: 10.1111/add.14747. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
6
Modelling the combined impact of interventions in averting deaths during a synthetic-opioid overdose epidemic.建模综合干预措施在避免合成阿片类药物过量流行期间死亡的影响。
Addiction. 2019 Sep;114(9):1602-1613. doi: 10.1111/add.14664. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
7
Estimated cost of comprehensive syringe service program in the United States.美国综合性注射器服务项目的预估成本。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 26;14(4):e0216205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216205. eCollection 2019.
8
The projected costs and benefits of a supervised injection facility in Seattle, WA, USA.美国华盛顿州西雅图市监管注射设施的预计成本和收益。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 May;67:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
9
Changing risk and presentation of overdose associated with consumption of street drugs at a supervised injection site in Vancouver, Canada.改变与在加拿大温哥华监督注射点使用街头毒品相关的过量风险和表现。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Mar 1;196:46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.12.016. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
10
Geographic variation in hospital costs, payments, and length of stay for opioid-related hospital visits in the USA.美国与阿片类药物相关的住院就诊在医院成本、支付费用及住院时长方面的地域差异。
J Pain Res. 2018 Dec 4;11:3079-3088. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S184724. eCollection 2018.