• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[长期给予莫唑胺能否改善大鼠庆大霉素肾毒性?]

[Can gentamicin nephrotoxicity in rats be modified by chronic administration of muzolimine?].

作者信息

Toutain H, Olier B, Fillastre J P, Morin J P

出版信息

Pathol Biol (Paris). 1986 Jun;34(5 Pt 2):582-6.

PMID:3534747
Abstract

Some loop diuretics seem to increase gentamicin nephrotoxicity. We investigated this property for a new diuretic, muzolimine, in female Wistar rats. Each rat was given gentamicin intraperitoneally in a dosage that induces morphological and functional modifications in the kidneys (20 mg/kg/day for 7 days). Muzolimine was given in a daily dosage of 15 mg/kg starting 15 days before the first gentamicin injection and continuing throughout the seven-day gentamicin course. As compared to controls given gentamicin alone, modifications induced by the muzolimine-gentamicin combination showed no significant differences for the following criteria: renal accumulation of gentamicin, membrane lysosomal latency, renal oxidative mitochondrial metabolism and cortical activity of renal cathepsin B, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) and alanine aminopeptidase. However, slightly lower sphingomyelinase activities (p less than 0.05) were found for muzolimine + gentamicin as compared to gentamicin alone. Urinary NAG excretion increase more with muzolimine + gentamicin than with gentamicin alone, perhaps as a result of the very significant increase in urinary output observed with the diuretic. Our results show that, in contrast to findings with another loop diuretic, furosemide, the renal toxicity of gentamicin is not noticeably modified by concomitant administration of muzolimine.

摘要

一些袢利尿剂似乎会增加庆大霉素的肾毒性。我们在雌性Wistar大鼠中研究了一种新型利尿剂莫唑胺的这一特性。每只大鼠腹腔注射庆大霉素,剂量为能引起肾脏形态和功能改变的剂量(20mg/kg/天,共7天)。莫唑胺从首次注射庆大霉素前15天开始,以每日15mg/kg的剂量给药,并在整个7天的庆大霉素疗程中持续给药。与单独给予庆大霉素的对照组相比,莫唑胺 - 庆大霉素联合用药引起的改变在以下指标上无显著差异:庆大霉素在肾脏中的蓄积、膜溶酶体潜伏性、肾脏线粒体氧化代谢以及肾脏组织蛋白酶B、N - 乙酰 - β - D - 氨基葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)和丙氨酸氨基肽酶的皮质活性。然而,与单独使用庆大霉素相比,莫唑胺 + 庆大霉素组的鞘磷脂酶活性略低(p小于0.05)。与单独使用庆大霉素相比,莫唑胺 + 庆大霉素组的尿NAG排泄增加更多,这可能是由于利尿剂导致尿量显著增加的结果。我们的结果表明,与另一种袢利尿剂呋塞米的研究结果相反,同时给予莫唑胺不会明显改变庆大霉素的肾毒性。

相似文献

1
[Can gentamicin nephrotoxicity in rats be modified by chronic administration of muzolimine?].[长期给予莫唑胺能否改善大鼠庆大霉素肾毒性?]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1986 Jun;34(5 Pt 2):582-6.
2
Influence of muzolimine, a new diuretic, on experimental gentamicin nephrotoxicity.新型利尿剂莫唑胺对实验性庆大霉素肾毒性的影响。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1987;2(6):520-5.
3
Polyaspartic acid protects against gentamicin nephrotoxicity in the rat.聚天冬氨酸可保护大鼠免受庆大霉素肾毒性的影响。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1989 Jul;250(1):149-53.
4
Influence of muzolimine and other diuretics on human red cell Na+, K+-cotransport.
Z Kardiol. 1985;74 Suppl 2:175-8.
5
Effect of methimazole and fish oil treatment on gentamicin nephrotoxicity in rats.甲巯咪唑和鱼油治疗对大鼠庆大霉素肾毒性的影响。
J Pharm Belg. 1997 Jul-Aug;52(4):149-56.
6
Gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in mice: protection by loop diuretics.庆大霉素诱导的小鼠肾毒性:袢利尿剂的保护作用。
Br J Exp Pathol. 1981 Apr;62(2):200-6.
7
Inhibition of gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity by pyridoxal-5'-phosphate in the rat.大鼠中磷酸吡哆醛对庆大霉素诱导的肾毒性的抑制作用。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1989 Jan;248(1):360-6.
8
The effect of muzolimine on the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism in the rat kidney.莫唑胺对大鼠肾脏球管反馈机制的影响。
Z Kardiol. 1985;74 Suppl 2:161-5.
9
Protective effect of lycopene on gentamicin-induced oxidative stress and nephrotoxicity in rats.番茄红素对庆大霉素诱导的大鼠氧化应激和肾毒性的保护作用。
Toxicology. 2005 Nov 15;215(3):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2005.07.007. Epub 2005 Aug 26.
10
[Urinary excretion of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) and its isoenzyme B as a marker of the nephrotoxicity of gentamicin: re-test from an animal model].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1988 Mar;36(3):240-4.