• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解析中国对外直接投资、制度差异与“一带一路”政策对能源效率的作用:一个超前沿 SBM 方法。

Unraveling the role of China's OFDI, institutional difference and B&R policy on energy efficiency: a meta-frontier super-SBM approach.

机构信息

School of Management, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Management Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(37):56454-56472. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19729-3. Epub 2022 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-19729-3
PMID:35347613
Abstract

Under the Belt and Road initiative, the cooperative network between Chinese firms and participating countries has evolved rapidly to seek new markets for foreign investment. Foreign investment is one of the most effective ways of improving environmental energy efficiency through technology spillover. Therefore, first, this article applies the foreign direct investment theory with an interactive effect of institutional difference on energy efficiency. We employed the meta-frontier super-slacks-based measure approach to find the sampled countries' environmental energy efficiency. We also divided the study sample into six regions to consider group heterogeneity and the variation in energy efficiency performance in various Belt and Road regions. For the empirical investigation, we applied the generalized method of moments approach. The impact of China's outward foreign direct investment on energy efficiency is positive in the full sample. Nevertheless, the region-wise study found mixed results regarding China's outward foreign direct investment to promote energy efficiency and the Belt and Road region. In addition, the study further infers that institutional distance can be the greater impediment to promoting host countries' efficient energy-based investment.

摘要

在“一带一路”倡议下,中国企业与参与国之间的合作网络迅速发展,以寻求外国投资的新市场。外国投资是通过技术溢出提高环境能源效率最有效的方法之一。因此,本文首先应用了具有制度差异互动效应的外国直接投资理论,来衡量能源效率。我们采用了基于超效率前沿的 meta-frontier 测度方法来衡量抽样国家的环境能源效率。我们还将研究样本分为六个地区,以考虑组间异质性和“一带一路”各地区能源效率表现的变化。对于实证研究,我们应用了广义矩方法。在全样本中,中国对外直接投资对能源效率的影响是积极的。然而,分区域研究发现,中国对外直接投资对促进能源效率和“一带一路”地区的影响存在差异。此外,该研究进一步推断,制度距离可能是促进投资国有效能源投资的更大障碍。

相似文献

1
Unraveling the role of China's OFDI, institutional difference and B&R policy on energy efficiency: a meta-frontier super-SBM approach.解析中国对外直接投资、制度差异与“一带一路”政策对能源效率的作用:一个超前沿 SBM 方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(37):56454-56472. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19729-3. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
2
Impact of China's outward foreign direct investment on green total factor productivity in "Belt and Road" participating countries: a perspective of institutional distance.“一带一路”参与国中国对外直接投资对绿色全要素生产率的影响:制度距离视角
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jan;28(4):4704-4715. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10849-2. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
3
The green halo effect of China's OFDI: evidence from countries along the Belt and Road.中国对外直接投资的绿色光环效应:来自“一带一路”沿线国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(26):68290-68312. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27202-y. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
4
China's outward foreign direct investment in energy sector: The role of "intimate" relations between countries.中国能源领域对外直接投资:国家间“亲密”关系的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 12;16(7):e0254199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254199. eCollection 2021.
5
Governance, financial development and China's outward foreign direct investment.治理、金融发展与中国对外直接投资。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 30;17(6):e0270581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270581. eCollection 2022.
6
Can outward foreign direct investment improve China's green economic efficiency?对外直接投资能否提高中国的绿色经济效率?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):37295-37309. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24823-7. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
7
Does Chinese foreign direct investment harm CO2 emissions in the Belt and Road Economies.中国对外直接投资是否损害“一带一路”经济体的二氧化碳排放。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(26):39528-39544. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18357-7. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
8
Does China's outward direct investment improve green total factor productivity in the "Belt and Road" countries? Evidence from dynamic threshold panel model analysis.中国对外直接投资是否提高了“一带一路”国家的绿色全要素生产率?基于动态门槛面板模型的分析证据。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Dec 1;275:111295. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111295. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
9
Outward foreign direct investment, green financial development, and green total factor productivity: evidence from China.对外直接投资、绿色金融发展与绿色全要素生产率:来自中国的证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(16):47485-47500. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25651-z. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
10
The impact of outward foreign direct investment on green innovation: the threshold effect of environmental regulation.对外直接投资对绿色创新的影响:环境规制的门槛效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jul;28(26):34868-34884. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12930-w. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic evolution of utilization efficiency of medical and health services in China.中国医疗卫生服务利用效率的动态演进。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0304157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304157. eCollection 2024.
2
Impact of "Three Red Lines" Water Policy (2011) on Water Usage Efficiency, Production Technology Heterogeneity, and Determinant of Water Productivity Change in China.“三条红线”水政策(2011 年)对中国用水效率、生产技术异质性和水生产率变化决定因素的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;19(24):16459. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416459.