Grupo de investigación Escuela Barraquer, Escuela Superior de Oftalmología del Instituto Barraquer de América, Bogotá, Colombia.
Grupo de investigación en neurociencias NeURos, Centro de Neurociencia (NeuroVitae), Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Perm J. 2021 May 26;25:20.225. doi: 10.7812/TPP/20.225.
The purpose of this work was to review the scientific evidence about dermatological and ophthalmological inflammatory, infectious, and tumoral tattoo-related reactions published in the literature.
We conducted a literature search from January 1, 2000 to July 15, 2020 in MEDLINE, COCHRANE, EMBASE, and LILACS. Limits regarding the language and period of publication were used. A data collection form was designed in Excel. Four reviewers independently extracted relevant details about the design and the results of each study.
One hundred four studies were included, most of them were conducted in Europe and North America. The remaining studies were conducted in Asia, South America, Africa, and Oceania. We included 52 case reports, 21 cross-sectional studies, 20 case series, 10 case-control studies, and 1 cohort study. Eighty-six studies described skin tattoos, of which 7 were publications of eyebrow tattoos and 6 of eyelid tattoos, and 5 articles included cases of subconjunctival tissue tattoos (eyeball). Fifty-seven studies described local reactions related to tattoos and 47 studies reported systemic reactions or reactions in different locations from the tattoo site. The types of reactions described in the studies were: infections in 45 studies, inflammatory reactions in 53 studies, neoplasia in 4 studies, and hypertrichosis in 2 studies.
This literature review evidenced a close relationship between the application of tattoos on dermatological and ophthalmological tissues, and the possible immunological complications, neoplasms, and infectious complications. Dermatologists and ophthalmologists should be aware of the consequences caused by even small amounts of ink applied on skin and eyes, generating the need for strict regulations for its use.
本研究旨在回顾文献中关于皮肤科和眼科炎症、感染和肿瘤性纹身相关反应的科学证据。
我们在 MEDLINE、COCHRANE、EMBASE 和 LILACS 中进行了从 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 7 月 15 日的文献检索。使用了语言和出版期限的限制。在 Excel 中设计了一个数据收集表。四位审稿人独立提取了每项研究的设计和结果的相关细节。
共纳入 104 项研究,其中大多数在欧洲和北美进行。其余研究在亚洲、南美洲、非洲和大洋洲进行。我们纳入了 52 例病例报告、21 项横断面研究、20 项病例系列研究、10 项病例对照研究和 1 项队列研究。86 项研究描述了皮肤纹身,其中 7 项是眉毛纹身的出版物,6 项是眼睑纹身的出版物,5 篇文章包括结膜组织纹身(眼球)的病例。57 项研究描述了与纹身相关的局部反应,47 项研究报告了全身性反应或纹身部位以外的其他部位的反应。研究中描述的反应类型包括:45 项研究中的感染、53 项研究中的炎症反应、4 项研究中的肿瘤和 2 项研究中的多毛症。
本文献综述表明,在皮肤和眼部组织上应用纹身与可能的免疫并发症、肿瘤和感染性并发症之间存在密切关系。皮肤科医生和眼科医生应意识到即使是少量的墨水应用于皮肤和眼睛也会产生后果,这就需要对其使用进行严格的监管。