Suppr超能文献

经支气管超声引导下经支气管针吸活检对肺癌纵隔分期为阴性后的纵隔镜检查确认:系统评价与Meta分析

Confirmatory Mediastinoscopy after Negative Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for Mediastinal Staging of Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sanz-Santos José, Almagro Pere, Malik Komal, Martinez-Camblor Pablo, Caro Conxi, Rami-Porta Ramón

机构信息

Department of Pulmonology, Mutua Terrassa Hospital.

Departament de Medicina, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Sep;19(9):1581-1590. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1302OC.

Abstract

Current guidelines for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) mediastinal staging recommend starting invasive staging with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). However, the indication to confirm a negative result of EBUS-TBNA by means of video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VAM) before resection differs in every guideline. Our aim was to evaluate the current evidence regarding the added value of confirmatory VAM after a negative EBUS-TBNA result for mediastinal staging in patients with NSCLC. Systematic searches of studies on EBUS-TBNA for NSCLC mediastinal staging with or without confirmatory VAM but with surgical confirmation of negative results were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement in PubMed, SCOPUS, the Cochrane Library, and guidelines from 2005 through November 2021. In the meta-analysis, the sensitivity of confirmatory VAM after a negative EBUS-TBNA result, as well as the sensitivity and negative predictive value of the combination EBUS-TBNA plus confirmatory VAM, alongside the number of confirmatory VAMs required to detect additional N2/3 disease (number needed to treat [NNT]), in patients with a previous negative EBUS-TBNA result were estimated. A total of 5,412 articles were found, of which 29 studies were included. Random effects meta-analysis showed a sensitivity of 66.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.8-77.1%) for confirmatory VAM, and 96.7% (95% CI, 95.1-98%) for the combination EBUS-TBNA plus confirmatory VAM. Negative predictive value in studies with confirmatory VAM increased of 79.2% (95% CI, 71.4-86.1%) for EBUS-TBNA alone to 91.8% (95% CI, 87.1-95.5%) for EBUS-TBNA plus confirmatory VAM. The NNT of confirmatory VAM in patients with a previous negative EBUS-TBNA result was 23.8 (95% CI, 19.3-31.2). Confirmatory VAM after negative EBUS-TBNA reduces the rate of unforeseen N2/3 disease, but with a high NNT, and it should be recommended only for certain cases yet to be defined.

摘要

非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)纵隔分期的现行指南建议,以内镜超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)开始进行侵入性分期。然而,每条指南中关于在切除术前通过电视辅助纵隔镜检查(VAM)来确认EBUS-TBNA阴性结果的指征各不相同。我们的目的是评估目前关于在NSCLC患者中,EBUS-TBNA结果为阴性后,确认性VAM对于纵隔分期的附加价值的证据。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目声明,在PubMed、SCOPUS、Cochrane图书馆以及2005年至2021年11月的指南中,对关于NSCLC纵隔分期采用或不采用确认性VAM的EBUS-TBNA研究进行了系统检索,且结果阴性需经手术证实。在Meta分析中,对EBUS-TBNA结果为阴性后确认性VAM的敏感性,以及EBUS-TBNA联合确认性VAM的敏感性和阴性预测值,连同在既往EBUS-TBNA结果为阴性的患者中检测出额外N2/3期疾病所需的确认性VAM数量(治疗所需人数[NNT])进行了估计。共检索到5412篇文章,其中纳入了29项研究。随机效应Meta分析显示,确认性VAM的敏感性为66.9%(95%置信区间[CI],55.8 - 77.1%),EBUS-TBNA联合确认性VAM的敏感性为96.7%(95% CI,95.1 - 98%)。在有确认性VAM的研究中,单独EBUS-TBNA的阴性预测值从79.2%(95% CI,71.4 - 86.1%)增加到EBUS-TBNA联合确认性VAM的91.8%(95% CI,87.1 - 95.5%)。既往EBUS-TBNA结果为阴性的患者中,确认性VAM的NNT为23.8(95% CI,19.3 - 31.2)。EBUS-TBNA结果为阴性后进行确认性VAM可降低意外N2/3期疾病的发生率,但NNT较高,仅应推荐用于某些尚未明确的病例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验