Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug 1;41(22):3785-3790. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00867. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Accurate staging of the mediastinal lymph nodes in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is critically important to determine the overall stage of the tumor and guide subsequent management. The staging process typically begins with positron emission tomography (PET) or computed tomography imaging; however, imaging alone is inadequate, and tissue acquisition is required for confirmation of nodal disease. Mediastinoscopy was long considered the gold standard for staging of mediastinal lymph nodes, but, recently, endobronchial ultrasound-guided (EBUS) fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has become the standard of care. EBUS-FNA, in combination with supplementary technologies, such as intranodal forceps biopsy and esophageal ultrasonography, has a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of nodal metastases. EBUS-FNA is also capable of assessing N1 disease and obtaining adequate tissue for tumor genomic analysis to help guide treatment. In the case of negative findings on EBUS, a confirmatory video mediastinoscopy is still recommended by the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons guidelines. However, whether confirmatory mediastinoscopy is necessary is a matter of debate, and it is not commonly performed in North America. To address this question, Bousema and colleagues performed a randomized noninferiority trial to determine rates of unforeseen nodal metastases after EBUS alone versus EBUS with confirmatory mediastinoscopy in patients with resectable NSCLC. The authors concluded that EBUS alone is noninferior to EBUS with confirmatory mediastinoscopy. These findings affirm our current practice to forgo confirmatory mediastinoscopy after negative findings on EBUS.
临床肿瘤学期刊,在可切除的非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 中准确分期纵隔淋巴结对于确定肿瘤的总体分期和指导后续治疗至关重要。分期过程通常从正电子发射断层扫描 (PET) 或计算机断层扫描成像开始;然而,仅靠成像并不充分,需要获取组织以确认淋巴结疾病。纵隔镜检查长期以来一直被认为是纵隔淋巴结分期的金标准,但最近,支气管内超声引导 (EBUS) 细针抽吸 (FNA) 已成为护理标准。EBUS-FNA 结合辅助技术,如淋巴结内活检钳和食管超声检查,对诊断淋巴结转移具有很高的敏感性和特异性。EBUS-FNA 还能够评估 N1 疾病并获取足够的组织进行肿瘤基因组分析,以帮助指导治疗。在 EBUS 检查结果阴性的情况下,欧洲胸外科医师学会指南仍建议进行确认性纵隔镜检查。然而,是否需要进行确认性纵隔镜检查仍存在争议,在北美并不常见。为了解决这个问题,Bousema 及其同事进行了一项随机非劣效性试验,以确定在可切除的 NSCLC 患者中,仅行 EBUS 与行 EBUS 加确认性纵隔镜检查后出现意外淋巴结转移的比率。作者得出结论,仅行 EBUS 与行 EBUS 加确认性纵隔镜检查的非劣效性。这些发现证实了我们目前的做法,即在 EBUS 检查结果阴性时放弃确认性纵隔镜检查。