• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康自助服务亭的作用:范围综述

The Role of Health Kiosks: Scoping Review.

作者信息

Maramba Inocencio Daniel, Jones Ray, Austin Daniela, Edwards Katie, Meinert Edward, Chatterjee Arunangsu

机构信息

Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Mar 29;10(3):e26511. doi: 10.2196/26511.

DOI:10.2196/26511
PMID:35348457
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9006133/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health kiosks are publicly accessible computing devices that provide access to services, including health information provision, clinical measurement collection, patient self-check-in, telemonitoring, and teleconsultation. Although the increase in internet access and ownership of smart personal devices could make kiosks redundant, recent reports have predicted that the market will continue to grow.

OBJECTIVE

We seek to clarify the current and future roles of health kiosks by investigating the settings, roles, and clinical domains in which kiosks are used; whether usability evaluations of health kiosks are being reported, and if so, what methods are being used; and what the barriers and facilitators are for the deployment of kiosks.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review using a bibliographic search of Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science databases for studies and other publications between January 2009 and June 2020. Eligible papers described the implementation as primary studies, systematic reviews, or news and feature articles. Additional reports were obtained by manual searching and querying the key informants. For each article, we abstracted settings, purposes, health domains, whether the kiosk was opportunistic or integrated with a clinical pathway, and whether the kiosk included usability testing. We then summarized the data in frequency tables.

RESULTS

A total of 141 articles were included, of which 134 (95%) were primary studies, and 7 (5%) were reviews. Approximately 47% (63/134) of the primary studies described kiosks in secondary care settings. Other settings included community (32/134, 23.9%), primary care (24/134, 17.9%), and pharmacies (8/134, 6%). The most common roles of the health kiosks were providing health information (47/134, 35.1%), taking clinical measurements (28/134, 20.9%), screening (17/134, 12.7%), telehealth (11/134, 8.2%), and patient registration (8/134, 6.0%). The 5 most frequent health domains were multiple conditions (33/134, 24.6%), HIV (10/134, 7.5%), hypertension (10/134, 7.5%), pediatric injuries (7/134, 5.2%), health and well-being (6/134, 4.5%), and drug monitoring (6/134, 4.5%). Kiosks were integrated into the clinical pathway in 70.1% (94/134) of studies, opportunistic kiosks accounted for 23.9% (32/134) of studies, and in 6% (8/134) of studies, kiosks were used in both. Usability evaluations of kiosks were reported in 20.1% (27/134) of papers. Barriers (e.g., use of expensive proprietary software) and enablers (e.g., handling of on-demand consultations) of deploying health kiosks were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Health kiosks still play a vital role in the health care system, including collecting clinical measurements and providing access to web-based health services and information to those with little or no digital literacy skills and others without personal internet access. We identified research gaps, such as training needs for teleconsultations and scant reporting on usability evaluation methods.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f6/9006133/cf0a87f6c959/medinform_v10i3e26511_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f6/9006133/cf0a87f6c959/medinform_v10i3e26511_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76f6/9006133/cf0a87f6c959/medinform_v10i3e26511_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

健康信息亭是可供公众使用的计算设备,可提供多种服务,包括提供健康信息、收集临床测量数据、患者自助挂号、远程监测和远程会诊。尽管互联网接入的增加和智能个人设备的普及可能会使信息亭变得多余,但最近的报告预测该市场将持续增长。

目的

我们旨在通过调查健康信息亭的使用场景、作用和临床领域;是否有关于健康信息亭可用性评估的报告,若有,采用了何种方法;以及信息亭部署的障碍和促进因素,来阐明其当前和未来的作用。

方法

我们进行了一项范围综述,通过对谷歌学术、PubMed和科学网数据库进行文献检索,查找2009年1月至2020年6月期间的研究及其他出版物。符合条件的论文将实施情况描述为原始研究、系统综述或新闻与专题文章。通过手动搜索和向关键信息提供者询问获取了其他报告。对于每篇文章,我们提取了场景、目的、健康领域、信息亭是机会性使用还是与临床路径整合,以及信息亭是否包括可用性测试。然后我们在频率表中总结了数据。

结果

共纳入141篇文章,其中134篇(95%)为原始研究,7篇(5%)为综述。约47%(63/134)的原始研究描述了二级医疗环境中的信息亭。其他场景包括社区(32/134,23.9%)、初级医疗(24/134,17.9%)和药房(8/134,6%)。健康信息亭最常见的作用是提供健康信息(47/134,35.1%)、进行临床测量(28/134,20.9%)、筛查(17/134,12.7%)、远程医疗(11/134,8.2%)和患者登记(8/134,6.0%)。最常涉及的5个健康领域是多种疾病(33/134,24.6%)、艾滋病毒(10/134,7.5%)、高血压(10/134,7.5%)、儿童损伤(7/134,5.2%)、健康与幸福(6/134,4.5%)以及药物监测(6/134,4.5%)。70.1%(94/134)的研究将信息亭整合到临床路径中,机会性使用信息亭的研究占23.9%(32/134),6%(8/134)的研究同时采用了这两种方式。20.1%(27/134)的论文报告了信息亭的可用性评估。确定了部署健康信息亭的障碍(如使用昂贵的专有软件)和促进因素(如按需会诊的处理)。

结论

健康信息亭在医疗保健系统中仍发挥着重要作用,包括收集临床测量数据以及为数字素养技能很少或没有、且无法个人接入互联网的人群提供基于网络的健康服务和信息。我们发现了研究空白,如远程会诊的培训需求以及可用性评估方法的报告较少。

相似文献

1
The Role of Health Kiosks: Scoping Review.健康自助服务亭的作用:范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Mar 29;10(3):e26511. doi: 10.2196/26511.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Vital signs-based healthcare kiosks for screening chronic and infectious diseases: a systematic review.用于筛查慢性和传染病的基于生命体征的医疗自助服务亭:一项系统综述
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Jan 21;5(1):28. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00738-5.
5
An Evaluation of Kiosks for Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine Using the National Quality Forum Assessment Framework.使用国家质量论坛评估框架对面向消费者的远程医疗信息亭进行评估。
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Feb;27(2):178-183. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0318. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
6
Utilization of integrated health kiosks: A systematic review.综合健康信息亭的应用:一项系统综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Sep 5;34:114. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.114. eCollection 2020.
7
The role of health kiosks in 2009: literature and informant review.2009年健康信息亭的作用:文献及信息提供者综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Jun;6(6):1818-55. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6061818. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
8
Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.面向医疗保险人群的远程医疗:儿科、产科及临床医生间接居家干预措施
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001 Aug(24 Suppl):1-32.
9
The role of health information kiosks in diverse settings: a systematic review.健康信息亭在不同环境中的作用:一项系统综述。
Health Info Libr J. 2014 Dec;31(4):254-73. doi: 10.1111/hir.12081. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
10
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies for enhancing PHC accessibility through mobile and capsule clinics: a spatial location allocation study in China.通过移动诊所和胶囊诊所提高初级卫生保健可及性的策略:中国的一项空间位置分配研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 23;25(1):973. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13083-z.
2
A digital health kiosk is acceptable, usable, and improves decisions about high-risk over-the-counter medications when used by older adults: Results of formative user testing.数字健康亭对于老年人来说是可接受、可用的,并且在使用时能改善关于高风险非处方药的决策:形成性用户测试结果
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2025 Jun 11:102451. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2025.102451.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Utilization of integrated health kiosks: A systematic review.综合健康信息亭的应用:一项系统综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Sep 5;34:114. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.114. eCollection 2020.
2
An Evaluation of Kiosks for Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine Using the National Quality Forum Assessment Framework.使用国家质量论坛评估框架对面向消费者的远程医疗信息亭进行评估。
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Feb;27(2):178-183. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0318. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Barriers and facilitators of deploying health kiosk in Iran: A qualitative study.
Safety and Efficacy of Digital Check-in and Triage Kiosks in Emergency Departments: Systematic Review.
急诊科数字登记和分诊信息亭的安全性与有效性:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 21;27:e69528. doi: 10.2196/69528.
4
Telemedicine Booths for Screening Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Prospective Multicenter Study.用于筛查心血管危险因素的远程医疗亭:前瞻性多中心研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Apr 22;12:e57032. doi: 10.2196/57032.
5
Exploration of digital health literacy among community members and healthcare teams in the deep south: A quasi-experimental study.美国最南部地区社区成员和医疗团队的数字健康素养探索:一项准实验研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 28;11:20552076251325581. doi: 10.1177/20552076251325581. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Use of a Kiosk-Model Self-Triage System for COVID-19 Triage.使用自助服务亭模式的自我分诊系统进行新冠病毒疾病分诊
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Feb 21;18:579-592. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S497053. eCollection 2025.
7
Swasthya Pahal (Health for All) Using a Sustainable, Multisector, Accessible, Affordable, Reimbursable, and Tailored Informatics Framework in Rural and Urban Areas of Chennai, Tamil Nadu: Protocol for a Quantitative Study.斯瓦斯提亚·帕哈尔(全民健康):在泰米尔纳德邦金奈城乡地区使用可持续、多部门、可及、可负担、可报销且量身定制的信息学框架:一项定量研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Feb 6;14:e39950. doi: 10.2196/39950.
8
Perspectives of Clients and Health Care Professionals on the Opportunities for Digital Health Interventions in Cerebrovascular Disease Care: Qualitative Descriptive Study.客户和医疗保健专业人员对脑血管疾病护理中数字健康干预机会的看法:定性描述性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 2;26:e52715. doi: 10.2196/52715.
9
Leveraging community Wi-Fi and spaces for digital health use.利用社区 Wi-Fi 和空间进行数字健康应用。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 7;12:1418627. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1418627. eCollection 2024.
10
Use of Mobile Technologies to Streamline Pretriage Patient Flow in the Emergency Department: Observational Usability Study.利用移动技术简化急诊科预检分诊患者流程:观察性可用性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jun 7;12:e54642. doi: 10.2196/54642.
伊朗部署健康信息亭的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Apr 28;9:95. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_548_19. eCollection 2020.
4
Check-in Kiosks in the Outpatient Clinical Setting: Fad or the Future?门诊临床环境中的自助挂号机:一时风尚还是未来趋势?
South Med J. 2020 Mar;113(3):134-139. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001078.
5
Self-Check-In Kiosks Utilization and Their Association With Wait Times in Emergency Departments in the United States.自助报到亭在美国急诊部门的使用情况及其与等待时间的关系。
J Emerg Med. 2020 May;58(5):829-840. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.11.019. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
6
How to Access Personal Health Records? Measuring the Intention to Use and the Perceived Usefulness of Two Different Technologies: A Randomised Controlled Study.如何访问个人健康记录?衡量两种不同技术的使用意愿和感知有用性:一项随机对照研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Sep 3;267:197-204. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190827.
7
Assessing usability of eHealth technology: A comparison of usability benchmarking instruments.评估电子健康技术的可用性:可用性基准测试工具比较。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Aug;128:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 5.
8
Mixed-methods feasibility study of blood pressure self-screening for hypertension detection.混合方法可行性研究:血压自我筛查在高血压检测中的应用。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 29;9(5):e027986. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027986.
9
The use of a self-check-in kiosk for early patient identification and queuing in the emergency department.自助报到机在急诊科用于提前识别和排队病人。
CJEM. 2019 Nov;21(6):789-792. doi: 10.1017/cem.2019.349.
10
Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: A scoping review.电子健康应用程序开发中的可用性测试方法:范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jun;126:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 31.