Niemöller Saskia, Hübner Ursula, Egbert Nicole, Babitsch Birgit
Health informatics research group, Osnabrück University AS, Germany.
Human Sciences, New Public Health, University Osnabrück, Germany.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Sep 3;267:197-204. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190827.
Personal health records (PHR) are instruments to compile, store and present health and wellness related data digitally with proven effects on self-management of diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there were differences in the intention to use (ITU) and perceived usefulness (PU) of two technologies allowing users to access the PHR, i.e. a kiosk system and a smart phone based app (access as usual). The study also aimed at modelling ITU and PU with multiple linear regressions. A total of 46 subject participated in the study who were randomly assigned to one of the two experimental groups (nkiosk = 22; napp = 24). The task for both groups was to digitise their "Medikationsplan" (medical record) and upload it to the PHR. There was no significant difference in ITU and PU between the two technologies. ITU could only be significantly explained by PU (R2 = .55, p < 0.001), while PU was determined by perceived ease of use and psychological factors (R2 = .64, p < 0.001). Severity of disease did not play any significant role. The German "Terminservice- und Versorgungsgesetz" underpins the importance and timeliness of this study. The assumption that both - the publicly accessible kiosk and the app - are equally acceptable for people of different gender, age and technology background demonstrates the opportunity to master a potential digital divide among the population and allows users to get access to their PHR in multiple ways.
个人健康记录(PHR)是用于以数字方式汇编、存储和呈现与健康和保健相关数据的工具,已被证明对疾病的自我管理有效果。本研究的目的是调查两种允许用户访问PHR的技术,即信息亭系统和基于智能手机的应用程序(照常访问)在使用意愿(ITU)和感知有用性(PU)方面是否存在差异。该研究还旨在通过多元线性回归对ITU和PU进行建模。共有46名受试者参与了该研究,他们被随机分配到两个实验组之一(信息亭组 = 22;应用程序组 = 24)。两组的任务都是将他们的“用药计划”(病历)数字化并上传到PHR。两种技术在ITU和PU方面没有显著差异。ITU只能由PU显著解释(R2 = 0.55,p < 0.001),而PU由感知易用性和心理因素决定(R2 = 0.64,p < 0.001)。疾病严重程度没有发挥任何显著作用。德国的《预约服务和供应法》强调了本研究的重要性和及时性。公共可用的信息亭和应用程序对不同性别、年龄和技术背景的人同样可接受的假设表明,有机会弥合人群中潜在的数字鸿沟,并允许用户以多种方式访问他们的PHR。