Suppr超能文献

通过以利益相关者为中心的参与章程(SCEC)来实施利益相关者参与。

Operationalizing Stakeholder Engagement Through the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Charter (SCEC).

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Advisory Committee Member, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(Suppl 1):105-108. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07029-4. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

Abstract

There is a need for clear strategies and procedures to operationalize stakeholder engagement in research studies. Clear guidelines that promote shared leadership among study investigators and research stakeholders are important for inclusive and sustainable partnerships. Such guidelines may take the form of a governance charter and can be a means for encouraging the participation and inclusion of stakeholders who may have little to no experience with research or are otherwise underrepresented in research. This perspective article presents the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Charter (SCEC), one effort to operationalize a stakeholder engagement approach between researchers and an advisory committee as guided by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's (PCORI) Research Engagement Principles (i.e., reciprocal relationships, partnerships, co-learning, transparency-honesty-trust). Building on the SCEC can help future investigators develop a study-specific, dynamic, governance document outlining advisory committee and research team preferences in areas such as role expectations, study governance, and decision-making procedures.

摘要

需要制定明确的战略和程序来实施利益相关者在研究中的参与。明确的准则可以促进研究调查人员和利益相关者之间的共同领导,对于包容性和可持续的合作伙伴关系非常重要。这些准则可以采取治理章程的形式,也可以鼓励那些可能几乎没有研究经验或在研究中代表性不足的利益相关者参与并包容他们。本文从利益相关者为中心的参与章程(SCEC)的角度出发,探讨了一种将利益相关者参与方法应用于研究人员和咨询委员会之间的尝试,该方法是由患者为中心的医疗成果研究所(PCORI)的研究参与原则(即相互关系、合作、共同学习、透明度-诚实-信任)指导的。基于 SCEC,可以帮助未来的研究人员制定一份特定于研究的、动态的治理文件,概述咨询委员会和研究团队在角色期望、研究治理和决策程序等方面的偏好。

相似文献

1
Operationalizing Stakeholder Engagement Through the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Charter (SCEC).
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(Suppl 1):105-108. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07029-4. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
2
The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research.
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Mar;15(2):165-170. doi: 10.1370/afm.2042.
3
What do stakeholders expect from patient engagement: Are these expectations being met?
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1035-1045. doi: 10.1111/hex.12797. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
4
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
5
The Impact of COVID-19 on Patient, Family Member, and Stakeholder Research Engagement: Insights from the PREPARE NOW Study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(Suppl 1):64-72. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07077-w. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
6
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
7
An evaluation of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: lessons learned from SWOG S1415CD.
J Comp Eff Res. 2022 Dec;11(18):1313-1321. doi: 10.2217/cer-2022-0158. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
8
Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP).
West J Nurs Res. 2021 Oct;43(10):949-961. doi: 10.1177/01939459211004274. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
9
A Multilevel Approach to Stakeholder Engagement in the Formulation of a Clinical Data Research Network.
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S22-S26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000778.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient and Patient Group Engagement in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Stakeholder Charter.
Curr Oncol. 2021 Apr 8;28(2):1447-1458. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28020137.
2
Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP).
West J Nurs Res. 2021 Oct;43(10):949-961. doi: 10.1177/01939459211004274. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
3
Development of Guidelines to Improve the Effectiveness of Community Advisory Boards in Health Research.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(2):259-269. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0026.
4
Researchers, patients, and other stakeholders' perspectives on challenges to and strategies for engagement.
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Oct 7;6:60. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00227-0. eCollection 2020.
5
Engaging patients and stakeholders in preresearch: findings from the Pipeline to Proposal Awards Initiative.
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Jul;9(10):721-736. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0203. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
Strategies to establish and maintain trust when working in immigrant communities.
Public Health Nurs. 2020 Sep;37(5):764-768. doi: 10.1111/phn.12764. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
7
Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research.
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):523-539. doi: 10.1111/hex.13040. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
8
Stakeholder engagement in research: a scoping review of current evaluation methods.
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Nov;8(15):1327-1341. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0047. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
9
10
Patient Engagement In Research: Early Findings From The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):359-367. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05067.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验