• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过职权范围建立有效的患者参与,以促进研究的包容性和赋权:来自医疗保健过渡质量指标项目的示例。

Establishing Effective Patient Engagement Through a Terms of Reference to Foster Inclusivity and Empowerment in Research: Example From a Healthcare Transition Quality Indicators Project.

机构信息

Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70113. doi: 10.1111/hex.70113.

DOI:10.1111/hex.70113
PMID:39610083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11604592/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient engagement in research aims to foster meaningful partnerships, integrating patient experiences into the research process. This paper describes the development of a Terms of Reference (ToR) to support these meaningful partnerships. While engagement improves data collection and empowerment, ineffective engagement can lead to negative outcomes. A well-developed ToR promotes a structured, inclusive, and respectful process.

METHODS

Using an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach, we established a panel of youth, caregivers, healthcare providers, and healthcare leaders/decision-makers. Through collaborative discussions, we incorporated key elements into the ToR, including values, roles, decision-making processes, and recognition of contributions.

RESULTS

To promote effective engagement the ToR included sections to encourage open, transparent and vulnerable dialogue, evaluation, and accommodations for disabilities. The ToR draft was reviewed and refined by panel members for clarity. Regular reviews and updates will keep the ToR a living document and adaptable to the evolving engagement process.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of our ToR is designed to foster inclusivity, mutual respect, and accountability, avoiding tokenistic partnership, enriching the experience for patients and researchers alike, and ultimately enhancing research quality.

摘要

简介

患者参与研究旨在促进有意义的合作,将患者的经验融入研究过程。本文描述了制定一份术语表(ToR)以支持这些有意义的合作。虽然参与可以改善数据收集和赋权,但无效的参与可能会导致负面结果。一个精心制定的 ToR 可以促进一个结构化、包容和尊重的过程。

方法

我们使用综合知识转化(iKT)方法,成立了一个由年轻人、照顾者、医疗保健提供者以及医疗保健领导者/决策者组成的小组。通过协作讨论,我们将关键要素纳入了 ToR,包括价值观、角色、决策过程以及对贡献的认可。

结果

为了促进有效的参与,ToR 包括鼓励开放、透明和脆弱对话、评估以及残疾适应的部分。ToR 草案由小组成员进行了审查和修订,以确保清晰明了。定期审查和更新将使 ToR 成为一份有活力的文件,并能够适应不断发展的参与过程。

结论

我们的 ToR 的实施旨在促进包容性、相互尊重和问责制,避免象征性的合作,丰富患者和研究人员的体验,并最终提高研究质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a29e/11604592/3dc110b930af/HEX-27-e70113-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a29e/11604592/3dc110b930af/HEX-27-e70113-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a29e/11604592/3dc110b930af/HEX-27-e70113-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Establishing Effective Patient Engagement Through a Terms of Reference to Foster Inclusivity and Empowerment in Research: Example From a Healthcare Transition Quality Indicators Project.通过职权范围建立有效的患者参与,以促进研究的包容性和赋权:来自医疗保健过渡质量指标项目的示例。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70113. doi: 10.1111/hex.70113.
2
Outcomes of an integrated knowledge translation approach in five African countries: a mixed-methods comparative case study.五个非洲国家综合知识转化方法的成果:一项混合方法比较案例研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 10;22(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01256-x.
3
Patient, caregiver and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives: a scoping review protocol.患者、照护者和其他知识使用者参与制定共识的医疗保健举措:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 8;14(5):e080822. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080822.
4
Stakeholders' engagement in co-producing policy-relevant knowledge to facilitate employment for persons with developmental disabilities.利益相关者参与共同制定与政策相关的知识,以促进发展性残疾人士的就业。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Apr 17;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00548-2.
5
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
6
Patient and Public Engagement in Integrated Knowledge Translation Research: Are we there yet?患者及公众参与整合知识转化研究:我们做到了吗?
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Feb 12;5:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0139-1. eCollection 2019.
7
Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge.基于社区的参与式研究和综合知识转化:推进知识的共同创造。
Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 19;12(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3.
8
Evaluation of an integrated knowledge translation approach used for updating the Cochrane Review of Patient Decision Aids: a pre-post mixed methods study.用于更新《Cochrane患者决策辅助工具综述》的综合知识转化方法的评估:一项前后对比的混合方法研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 9;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00550-w.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
Commonalities and distinctions of pediatric patient and family engagement in clinical care, education, and research contexts: Protocol for a scoping review.儿科患者及其家庭在临床护理、教育和研究背景下参与的共性与差异:一项范围综述方案
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 8;20(8):e0330104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330104. eCollection 2025.
2
Knowledge user perspectives on integrated knowledge translation (iKT) in health interventions research for people with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative descriptive study.多发性硬化症患者健康干预研究中综合知识转化(iKT)的知识使用者观点:一项定性描述性研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 28;11(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00763-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality Indicators for Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care for Youth With Chronic Conditions: Proposal for an Online Modified Delphi Study.质量指标从儿科过渡到成人保健的青年与慢性疾病:提议的在线修正德尔菲研究。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 10;13:e60860. doi: 10.2196/60860.
2
Engaging patient and community stakeholders in the optimization of the Compassionate And Loving Mindset towards heart health risk (CALM Hearts) physical activity intervention: a description of initial work and protocol for future engagement activities.让患者和社区利益相关者参与优化针对心脏健康风险的关爱心态(CALM Hearts)体育活动干预:初步工作描述及未来参与活动方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 May 1;10(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00577-z.
3
Reflections on patient engagement by patient partners: how it can go wrong.
患者合作伙伴对患者参与的反思:可能出现的问题。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 12;9(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00454-1.
4
Laying the foundations of community engagement in Aboriginal health research: establishing a community reference group and terms of reference in a novel research field.奠定原住民健康研究中社区参与的基础:在一个全新的研究领域建立社区参考小组及职权范围。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 4;8(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00365-7.
5
Operationalizing Stakeholder Engagement Through the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Charter (SCEC).通过以利益相关者为中心的参与章程(SCEC)来实施利益相关者参与。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(Suppl 1):105-108. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07029-4. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
6
Addressing power dynamics in community-engaged research partnerships.解决社区参与式研究伙伴关系中的权力动态问题。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Apr 5;4(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00191-z.
7
Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.加拿大的患者参与:对健康研究中患者参与的“方式”和“内容”的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4.