School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, St Kilda, Victoria 3004, Australia.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, St Kilda, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Jul-Aug;101:104694. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104694. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
Polypharmacy and frailty are two common geriatric conditions. In community-dwelling healthy older adults, we examined whether polypharmacy is associated with frailty and affects disability-free survival (DFS), assessed as a composite of death, dementia, or persistent physical disability.
We included 19,114 participants (median age 74.0 years, IQR: 6.1 years) from ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) clinical trial. Frailty was assessed by a modified Fried phenotype and a deficit accumulation Frailty Index (FI). Polypharmacy was defined as concomitant use of five or more prescription medications. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the cross-sectional association between polypharmacy and frailty at base line, and Cox regression to determine the effect of polypharmacy and frailty on DFS over five years.
Individuals with polypharmacy (vs. <5 medications) were 55% more likely to be pre-frail (Relative Risk Ratio or RRR: 1.55; 95%Confidence Interval or CI:1.44, 1.68) and three times more likely to be frail (RRR: 3.34; 95%CI:2.64, 4.22) according to Fried phenotype. Frailty alone was associated with double risk of the composite outcome (Hazard ratio or HR: 2.16; 95%CI: 1.56, 2.99), but frail individuals using polypharmacy had a four-fold risk (HR: 4.24; 95%CI: 3.28, 5.47). Effect sizes were larger when frailty was assessed using the FI.
Polypharmacy was significantly associated with pre-frailty and frailty at baseline. Polypharmacy-exposed frailty increased the risk of reducing disability-free survival among older adults. Addressing polypharmacy in older people could ameliorate the impact of frailty on individuals' functional status, cognition and survival.
多种药物治疗和虚弱是两种常见的老年病。在社区居住的健康老年人中,我们研究了多种药物治疗是否与虚弱有关,并影响无残疾生存(DFS),评估为死亡、痴呆或持续身体残疾的综合指标。
我们纳入了来自阿司匹林减少老年人事件(ASPREE)临床试验的 19114 名参与者(中位年龄 74.0 岁,IQR:6.1 岁)。通过改良的 Fried 表型和缺陷累积虚弱指数(FI)评估虚弱。多种药物治疗定义为同时使用五种或更多种处方药。多分类逻辑回归用于检查基线时多种药物治疗与虚弱之间的横断面关联,Cox 回归用于确定多种药物治疗和虚弱对五年内 DFS 的影响。
与使用<5 种药物的患者相比,使用多种药物治疗的患者更有可能出现衰弱前期(相对风险比或 RRR:1.55;95%置信区间或 CI:1.44,1.68),出现虚弱的可能性增加三倍(RRR:3.34;95%CI:2.64,4.22),根据 Fried 表型。单独的虚弱与复合结局的风险增加一倍(危险比或 HR:2.16;95%CI:1.56,2.99),但使用多种药物治疗的虚弱患者的风险增加四倍(HR:4.24;95%CI:3.28,5.47)。当使用 FI 评估虚弱时,效果大小更大。
多种药物治疗与基线时的衰弱前期和虚弱显著相关。暴露于多种药物治疗的虚弱增加了老年人无残疾生存减少的风险。在老年人中解决多种药物治疗问题可以减轻虚弱对个人功能状态、认知和生存的影响。