Suppr超能文献

急诊科非特异性主诉老年患者护理路径的评估:一项前后对照研究。

Evaluation of a care pathway for older adults presenting with nonspecific complaints at the emergency department: a before-and-after study.

作者信息

van der Velde M G A M, Jansen M A C, Derkx-Verhagen F, Tournoij I P B, Jonkers F S, Haak H R, Kremers M N T

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima MC, De Run 4600, 5504 DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.

Department of Health Services Research, and CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Aging and Long Term Care Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 May 7. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01226-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Managing older patients presenting at the Emergency Department (ED) poses challenges due to their predisposition to present with nonspecific complaints (NSC). With an ageing population and ED overcrowding, significance of NSC is expected to grow. Therefore, we implemented a structured care pathway to address the complexity of NSC presentations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectivity of this care pathway.

METHODS

We conducted a before-and-after study to evaluate the NSC care pathway, which included risk stratification, standardized assessment and diagnostic measurements. A control group receiving standard care was established in two hospitals (hospital 1 and 2) before implementation. Patient enrollment occurred from April 2021 to November 2024. Outcomes included length of stay in the ED (LOS-ED) and in hospital (LOS-H), revisits, diagnostic completeness (i.e. 100% agreement between all ED and hospital discharge diagnoses) and perceived quality of care.

RESULTS

In total, 164 control and 235 intervention patients were included in this study. Median LOS-ED and LOS-H did not show significant differences between the control and intervention patients. Implementation of the care pathway showed non-significant trends towards improved diagnostic completeness (47.1% vs 37.2%, p = 0.096). This might be associated with the non-significant observed decrease in 30-day readmissions (7.5% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.256). Patient-reported outcomes indicated a positive experience with the quality of care.

CONCLUSION

The care pathway did not improve LOS-ED and LOS-H as hypothesized, possibly due to logistical barriers and patient variability. However, trends suggested improved diagnostic completeness and fewer 30-day readmission rates. Further research initiatives are needed to enhance patient outcomes and care for NSC patients.

TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER

NL8960, date 9-10-2020.

摘要

目的

由于老年患者易出现非特异性主诉(NSC),管理急诊科(ED)的老年患者具有挑战性。随着人口老龄化和急诊科拥挤,非特异性主诉的重要性预计会增加。因此,我们实施了一条结构化护理路径来应对非特异性主诉就诊的复杂性。本研究的目的是评估这条护理路径的有效性。

方法

我们进行了一项前后对照研究以评估非特异性主诉护理路径,该路径包括风险分层、标准化评估和诊断措施。在实施前,在两家医院(医院1和医院2)设立了接受标准护理的对照组。患者入组时间为2021年4月至2024年11月。结局指标包括急诊科住院时间(LOS-ED)、住院时间(LOS-H)、复诊、诊断完整性(即所有急诊科诊断与出院诊断完全一致)以及感知的护理质量。

结果

本研究共纳入164名对照组患者和235名干预组患者。对照组和干预组患者的中位LOS-ED和LOS-H无显著差异。护理路径的实施显示出诊断完整性改善的非显著趋势(47.1%对37.2%,p = 0.096)。这可能与观察到的30天再入院率的非显著下降有关(7.5%对12.7%,p = 0.256)。患者报告的结局表明对护理质量有积极体验。

结论

护理路径并未如预期改善LOS-ED和LOS-H,可能是由于后勤障碍和患者个体差异。然而,趋势表明诊断完整性有所改善,30天再入院率降低。需要进一步的研究举措来改善非特异性主诉患者的结局和护理。

试验注册号

NL8960,日期2020年10月9日。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验