Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Strada provinciale per Casamassima Km 3, 70010 Valenzano, BA, Italy.
Veterinaria Cetego, Via M.C. Cetego 20, 00177 Rome, Italy.
Prev Vet Med. 2022 May;202:105618. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105618. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
Since domestic dogs are the main reservoir hosts of Leishmania infantum throughout the world, they are the main focus in terms of controlling zoonotic visceral leishmaniosis. To protect dogs from leishmaniosis, chemical repellents of durable efficacy are available in the form of collars, spot-on and sprays. However, the negative effects of chemical pesticides on the environment are well established as they affect animals and plants. This phenomenon has created the need for safer and more environmentally friendly substitutes. Plant extract-based insecticides and/or repellents have therefore been increasingly used by pet owners and veterinarians. Several botanical products have been tested as insecticides and/or repellents against a variety of bloodsucking arthropods that transmit human diseases. Among the products tested against Leishmania vectors, neem oil containing azadirachtin is the most studied. This study reviews the scientific literature concerning the efficacy of neem oil (azadirachtin-based products) against phlebotomine sand fly bites. A questionnaire was also administered to assess Italian veterinarians' attitudes to the use of neem oil. The survey was anonymous and consisted of three closed-ended questions. According to the data reported in the literature, the efficacy of neem oil in reducing the risk of sand fly bites has been tested against Phlebotomus papatasi, Phlebotomus perniciosus, Phlebotomus argentipes, Phlebotomus orientalis and Phlebotomus bergeroti. The efficacy of the products tested was expressed in percentages, ranging from 74.9% to 100%. The protection time was only available for six out of eight studies, ranging from "only during the first hour" (minimum protection time) to "all night" (expected maximum protection time). As regards the attitude to recommending the use of neem oil, 208 veterinarians participated in the online survey. Of the 126 veterinarians who recommended natural products, 119 (94.44%) reported that they recommended the use of neem oil-based products. Considering the limited data on the duration of protection and the dose of the active ingredient, more studies are required on the efficacy of neem oil-based products in reducing the risk of contracting canine leishmaniosis. These studies should also refer specifically to the concentration of the active ingredient as well as the interval of administration. Until such results are available, the use of azadirachtin-based products as the only topical products for the prevention of leishmaniosis in dogs is not recommended.
由于国内的狗是全世界利什曼原虫的主要宿主,因此它们是控制动物内脏利什曼病的主要关注点。为了保护狗免受利什曼病的侵害,市场上有许多长效的化学驱虫项圈、滴剂和喷雾剂可供选择。然而,化学农药对环境的负面影响是众所周知的,因为它们会影响动物和植物。这种现象导致了人们对更安全、更环保的替代品的需求。因此,宠物主人和兽医越来越多地使用基于植物提取物的杀虫剂和/或驱虫剂。已经有几种植物产品被测试过作为杀虫剂和/或驱虫剂来防治各种传播人类疾病的吸血节肢动物。在针对利什曼病传播媒介的产品中,含有印楝素的印楝油是研究最多的。本研究综述了有关印楝油(基于印楝素的产品)防治沙蝇叮咬的科学文献。此外,还向意大利兽医发放了一份调查问卷,以评估他们对使用印楝油的态度。该调查是匿名的,由三个封闭式问题组成。根据文献中报道的数据,印楝油在降低沙蝇叮咬风险方面的功效已在埃及伊蚊、白蛉属、长角血蜱、东方白蛉和柏氏白蛉等物种中进行了测试。测试产品的功效以百分比表示,范围从 74.9%到 100%。只有八项研究中的六项提供了保护时间,范围从“仅在第一小时内”(最短保护时间)到“整夜”(预计最大保护时间)。至于推荐使用印楝油的态度,有 208 名兽医参与了在线调查。在推荐天然产品的 126 名兽医中,有 119 名(94.44%)表示他们推荐使用基于印楝油的产品。考虑到关于保护时间和有效成分剂量的有限数据,还需要更多关于基于印楝油的产品在降低犬利什曼病风险方面的功效的研究。这些研究还应特别提及有效成分的浓度以及给药间隔。在获得这些结果之前,不建议将基于印楝素的产品作为预防犬利什曼病的唯一局部产品。