Richard Celine, Baker Emily, Wood Joshua
Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine, Memphis, TN, United States.
Division of Otolaryngology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 8;9:844810. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.844810. eCollection 2022.
Although cutting-edges antineoplastic therapies increase survival in children with malignancies, the optimal surgical strategy to address associated comorbidities such as chronic tympanic membrane perforation is still poorly documented. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of type I tympanoplasty in pediatric cancer survivors who received chemo and/or radiotherapy to the skull and to identify potential associated risk factors.
This case-control study included medical records review of oncologic patients (age <21) treated at the same Academic medical oncologic center between March 2015 and July 2021 and referred for conductive hearing loss and chronic tympanic membrane perforation. Patients and middle ear status-related variables were analyzed, and outcomes were compared with matched peers without any history of malignancies.
A total of seven pediatric cancer survivors and seven paired children without any history of malignancies were included in this report. The mean age at tympanoplasty type I surgery was 10.2 years (range = 4.3-19.9; median = 7.9 years) for the pediatric cancer survivors' group and 10.1 years (range = 5.5-19.2; median = 7.9 years) in the control group. Three pediatric cancer patients had received chemotherapy alone, one patient had radiotherapy to the skull base, and three patients had received chemoradiotherapy. On average, surgery was performed 3.9 years after chemo and/or radiotherapy termination, except for 1 patient for whom the tympanoplasty was performed during chemotherapy treatment. A retroauricular approach was used for one of the pediatric cancer patients, a transcanal approach was performed in one other and five patients benefited from an otoendoscopic approach. Tragal perichondrium with cartilage was used in most of the pediatric cancer survivor cases (four out seven cases) while xenograft (Biodesign) and Temporalis fascia without cartilage graft were used in five out of the seven control cases. Rate of tympanic membrane perforation recurrence was similar between groups (28.6%). Mean functional gain for air conduction Pure Tone Average (AC PTA) was 2.6 and 7.7 dB HL for the oncologic and control group, respectively. Mean postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) was 10.7 dB HL [median = 8.7; inter-quartile range () = 13.8] for the oncologic cohort and 10.1 dB HL (median = 10.7; = 9.6) for the control group.
Chemo- and chemoradiotherapy to the skull are associated with damages to the inner and middle ear structures with secondary eustachian tube dysfunction and chronic middle ear effusion. Although healing abilities and immunological defenses are compromised as part of the expected effects of antineoplastic therapies, type I tympanoplasty can be safe and effective in this population. While different approaches may be considered, otoendoscopy showed excellent results with less morbidity in this vulnerable population.
尽管前沿的抗肿瘤疗法提高了恶性肿瘤患儿的生存率,但针对诸如慢性鼓膜穿孔等相关合并症的最佳手术策略仍鲜有文献记载。本研究的目的是评估接受过头部化疗和/或放疗的儿科癌症幸存者进行Ⅰ型鼓室成形术的效果,并确定潜在的相关风险因素。
本病例对照研究包括对2015年3月至2021年7月在同一学术性医学肿瘤中心接受治疗且因传导性听力损失和慢性鼓膜穿孔而转诊的肿瘤患者(年龄<21岁)的病历进行回顾。分析患者及与中耳状况相关的变量,并将结果与无任何恶性肿瘤病史的匹配同龄人进行比较。
本报告共纳入7名儿科癌症幸存者和7名配对的无任何恶性肿瘤病史的儿童。儿科癌症幸存者组Ⅰ型鼓室成形术的平均年龄为10.2岁(范围=4.3-19.9岁;中位数=7.9岁),对照组为10.1岁(范围=5.5-19.2岁;中位数=7.9岁)。3名儿科癌症患者仅接受了化疗,1名患者接受了颅底放疗,3名患者接受了放化疗。平均而言,手术在化疗和/或放疗结束后3.9年进行,但有1名患者在化疗期间进行了鼓室成形术。1名儿科癌症患者采用了耳后入路,另1名采用了经耳道入路,5名患者受益于耳内镜入路。大多数儿科癌症幸存者病例(7例中的4例)使用了带软骨的耳屏软骨膜,而7例对照病例中的5例使用了异种移植物(生物设计)和不带软骨移植的颞肌筋膜。两组鼓膜穿孔复发率相似(28.6%)。肿瘤组和对照组气导纯音平均听阈(AC PTA)的平均功能增益分别为2.6 dB HL和7.7 dB HL。肿瘤队列的平均术后气骨导间距(ABG)为10.7 dB HL[中位数=8.7;四分位间距(IQR)=13.8],对照组为10.1 dB HL(中位数=10.7;IQR=9.6)。
头部化疗和放化疗会对内耳和中耳结构造成损害,继发咽鼓管功能障碍和慢性中耳积液。尽管作为抗肿瘤疗法预期效果的一部分,愈合能力和免疫防御功能会受到损害,但Ⅰ型鼓室成形术在这一人群中可以是安全有效的。虽然可以考虑不同的入路,但耳内镜在这一脆弱人群中显示出良好的效果且发病率较低。