• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

滥用性监督是压垮骆驼的最后一根稻草吗?解释水平在滥用性监督与离职关联中的缓冲作用。

Is Abusive Supervision the Last Straw? The Buffering Role of Construal Level in the Association of Abusive Supervision With Withdrawal.

作者信息

Gao Riguang, Liu Bo

机构信息

School of Business Administration, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, China.

School of Foreign Language Studies, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 8;13:831185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.831185. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.831185
PMID:35350730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8957970/
Abstract

Drawing on the theory of cognitive-affective processing system and that of construal level, we propose a moderated mediation model illustrating the relationship among abusive supervision, shame, construal level, and work withdrawal. We tested this model with a two-source time-lagged survey of 387 employees from 129 work teams in central and East China. Results revealed that abusive supervision had a positive association with the emotion of shame and supported the mediating role of shame linking abusive supervision to work withdrawal. Besides, our findings supported the buffering effect of construal level on the shame-work withdrawal relationship as well as the indirect relationship between abusive supervision and work withdrawal channeled through the emotion of shame.

摘要

基于认知-情感加工系统理论和解释水平理论,我们提出了一个有调节的中介模型,以阐明辱虐管理、羞耻感、解释水平和工作退缩之间的关系。我们采用两源时滞调查法,对来自中国中部和东部129个工作团队的387名员工进行了测试。结果显示,辱虐管理与羞耻感呈正相关,并支持了羞耻感在辱虐管理与工作退缩之间的中介作用。此外,我们的研究结果支持了解释水平对羞耻感-工作退缩关系的缓冲作用,以及辱虐管理与通过羞耻感传导的工作退缩之间的间接关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df78/8957970/08d0d13fbd22/fpsyg-13-831185-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df78/8957970/1ad6d0b71309/fpsyg-13-831185-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df78/8957970/08d0d13fbd22/fpsyg-13-831185-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df78/8957970/1ad6d0b71309/fpsyg-13-831185-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df78/8957970/08d0d13fbd22/fpsyg-13-831185-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Is Abusive Supervision the Last Straw? The Buffering Role of Construal Level in the Association of Abusive Supervision With Withdrawal.滥用性监督是压垮骆驼的最后一根稻草吗?解释水平在滥用性监督与离职关联中的缓冲作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 8;13:831185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.831185. eCollection 2022.
2
From Struggle to Strength: Coping with Abusive Supervision in Project Teams through Proactive Behavior and Team Building.从挣扎到力量:通过积极行为和团队建设应对项目团队中的虐待性监督
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 29;14(6):456. doi: 10.3390/bs14060456.
3
Longitudinal relations between abusive supervision, subordinates' emotional exhaustion, and job neglect among Pakistani Nurses: The moderating role of self-compassion.巴基斯坦护士中虐待性监督、下属情绪耗竭与工作疏忽之间的纵向关系:自我同情的调节作用。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Oct 5:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03817-1.
4
The effects of leaders' abusive supervision on employees' work engagement: a moderated-mediation model of employees' silence and employees' proactive personalities.领导的辱骂性监管对员工工作投入的影响:员工沉默和员工积极人格的中介调节模型。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2022 Jul 8;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-03-2022-0021.
5
Subordinate poor performance as a stressor on leader well-being: The mediating role of abusive supervision and the moderating role of motives for abuse.下属表现不佳会对领导的幸福感造成压力:虐待型监管在其中起到中介作用,而虐待动机则起到调节作用。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2021 Dec;26(6):491-506. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000307. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
6
The Effect of Abusive Supervision on Safety Behaviour: A Moderated Mediation Model.虐待型监管对安全行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 18;18(22):12124. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212124.
7
Does Work Stressors Lead to Abusive Supervision? A Study of Differentiated Effects of Challenge and Hindrance Stressors.工作压力源会导致辱骂式监管吗?一项关于挑战性压力源和阻碍性压力源不同影响的研究。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020 Jul 21;13:573-588. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S249071. eCollection 2020.
8
An Eye for an Eye? Third Parties' Silence Reactions to Peer Abusive Supervision: The Mediating Role of Workplace Anxiety, and the Moderating Role of Core Self-Evaluation.以眼还眼?第三方对同伴辱骂性监督的沉默反应:职场焦虑的中介作用,以及核心自我评价的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 10;16(24):5027. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245027.
9
Effects of abusive supervision on employees' innovative behavior: The role of job insecurity and locus of control.辱虐管理对员工创新行为的影响:工作不安全感与控制点的作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2019 Apr;60(2):152-159. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12510. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
10
Why Not All the Powerful Abuse? The Competitive Effects of Psychological Distance and Self-Control.为何并非所有强者都会滥用权力?心理距离和自我控制的竞争效应。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 9;12:730365. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730365. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The whiplash effect: The (moderating) role of attributed motives in emotional and behavioral reactions to abusive supervision.鞭打效应:归因动机在对辱骂性监督的情绪和行为反应中的(调节)作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2021 May;106(5):754-773. doi: 10.1037/apl0000810. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
2
Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: does conscientiousness matter?敌对的工作环境、辱骂性的监督管理和员工应对策略:尽责性是否重要?
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Jul;99(4):737-47. doi: 10.1037/a0035863. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
3
Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior.
解释水平与心理距离:对表征、预测、评估及行为的影响
J Consum Psychol. 2007;17(2):83-95. doi: 10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X.
4
Uncovering the affective core of conscientiousness: the role of self-conscious emotions.揭示尽责性的情感核心:自我意识情绪的作用。
J Pers. 2012 Feb;80(1):1-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00720.x.
5
A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation.一种用于评估多层次中介的通用多层次 SEM 框架。
Psychol Methods. 2010 Sep;15(3):209-33. doi: 10.1037/a0020141.
6
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.心理距离的构建层次理论。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):440-63. doi: 10.1037/a0018963.
7
Self-affirmation and self-control: affirming core values counteracts ego depletion.自我肯定与自我控制:肯定核心价值观可抵消自我损耗。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Apr;96(4):770-82. doi: 10.1037/a0014635.
8
Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs.辱骂性监督、职场偏差行为以及负面互惠信念的调节作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jul;92(4):1159-68. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159.
9
Shame: mechanisms of activation and consequences for social perception, self-image, and general negative emotion.羞耻感:激活机制及其对社会认知、自我形象和一般负面情绪的影响
J Pers. 2007 Jun;75(3):595-627. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00450.x.
10
Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis.整合调节与中介作用的方法:一种使用调节路径分析的通用分析框架。
Psychol Methods. 2007 Mar;12(1):1-22. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1.