• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质子泵抑制剂管理委员会的多方面干预对门诊和急诊科酸抑制剂处方模式的影响。

Impact of proton pump inhibitor management committee's multifaceted interventions on acid suppressant prescribing patterns in outpatient and emergency departments.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 Taiping Street, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, China.

School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, No.1 Xianglin Street, Longmatan District, Luzhou, 646000, China.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 29;22(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07820-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-07820-x
PMID:35351121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8966235/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A nationwide campaign for rational proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use launched in 2015 had a positive impact for hospitalized patients PPI use. But there were few studies focusing on the rational use of PPIs in outpatients. In 2018, the PPI management committee conducted a year-long intervention on the appropriate use of PPIs in outpatient and emergency departments, including clinical pharmacist interventions and stewardship interventions. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of the PPI management committee's multifaceted interventions by comparing the real-world acid suppressant prescribing patterns for outpatients before (2017) and after intervention (2019) at a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital.

METHODS

Prescriptions containing any acid suppressant in outpatient and emergency departments in baseline (2017) and postintervention (2019) periods were extracted from the hospital information system and the prescription automatic screening system. Acid suppressant prescribing patterns were evaluated based on primary diagnoses and patient demographics. The prescribed acid suppressants stratified using age groups (< 7, 7-17, 18-45, 46-65, 66-85 and > 85 years) were also examined.

RESULT

The utilization rate of acid suppressant in 2017 and 2019 was 2.5% (41,165/1,619,366) and 2.2% (49,550/2,236,471), respectively (P < 0.0001). 60,135 acid suppressant prescriptions were obtained in 2017 and 73,275 in 2019. The rate of acid suppressant prescriptions for the approved indications significantly increased from 62.6% (2017) to 65.4% (2019) (P < 0.0001). Prescriptions diagnosed as abnormal symptoms, signs and clinical manifestations, decreased in 2019 (13.0% vs. 16.5%, P < 0.0001). The most frequently prescribed PPIs differed between 2017 and 2019 (rabeprazole 2017 vs. esomeprazole 2019). Omeprazole was the most common PPI and cimetidine was the most common HRA prescribed to patients aged < 18 years in 2017 and 2019. A total of CNY11.83 million was spent on acid suppressants in 2019, accounting for about 48.7% of total medication cost, increased by 11.3% from 2017 (37.4%).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of acid suppressant prescriptions for approved indications was enhanced after the PPI management committee's multifaceted interventions, but there were still some problems in the selection of acid suppressants.

摘要

背景

2015 年发起了一项全国性的质子泵抑制剂(PPI)合理使用运动,该运动对住院患者的 PPI 使用产生了积极影响。但是,很少有研究关注门诊患者中 PPI 的合理使用。2018 年,PPI 管理委员会对门诊和急诊科 PPI 的合理使用进行了为期一年的干预,包括临床药师干预和管理干预。本研究旨在通过比较中国一家三级教学医院 2017 年(基线期)和 2019 年(干预后)门诊酸抑制剂处方模式,评估 PPI 管理委员会多方面干预的效果。

方法

从医院信息系统和处方自动筛选系统中提取基线期(2017 年)和干预后(2019 年)门诊和急诊科含任何酸抑制剂的处方。根据主要诊断和患者人口统计学特征评估酸抑制剂的处方模式。还检查了按年龄组(<7、7-17、18-45、46-65、66-85 和>85 岁)分层的处方酸抑制剂。

结果

2017 年和 2019 年酸抑制剂的使用率分别为 2.5%(41165/1619366)和 2.2%(49550/2236471)(P<0.0001)。2017 年获得 60135 份酸抑制剂处方,2019 年获得 73275 份。批准适应症的酸抑制剂处方率从 2017 年的 62.6%显著增加到 2019 年的 65.4%(P<0.0001)。诊断为异常症状、体征和临床表现的处方在 2019 年减少(13.0%比 16.5%,P<0.0001)。2017 年和 2019 年最常开的 PPI 不同(雷贝拉唑 2017 年比埃索美拉唑 2019 年)。奥美拉唑是 2017 年和 2019 年<18 岁患者最常开的 PPI,西咪替丁是最常开的 H2RA。2019 年用于酸抑制剂的费用为 1.183 亿元人民币,占总用药费用的约 48.7%,比 2017 年(37.4%)增长了 11.3%。

结论

PPI 管理委员会多方面干预后,批准适应症的酸抑制剂处方比例有所提高,但酸抑制剂的选择仍存在一些问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874c/8966235/3118bb4743d2/12913_2022_7820_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874c/8966235/be77521489e1/12913_2022_7820_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874c/8966235/3118bb4743d2/12913_2022_7820_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874c/8966235/be77521489e1/12913_2022_7820_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/874c/8966235/3118bb4743d2/12913_2022_7820_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of proton pump inhibitor management committee's multifaceted interventions on acid suppressant prescribing patterns in outpatient and emergency departments.质子泵抑制剂管理委员会的多方面干预对门诊和急诊科酸抑制剂处方模式的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 29;22(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07820-x.
2
Changes in proton pump inhibitor prescribing trend over the past decade and pharmacists' effect on prescribing practice at a tertiary hospital.过去十年质子泵抑制剂处方趋势的变化及药师对三级医院处方实践的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3358-5.
3
A cross-sectional study of national outpatient gastric acid suppressant prescribing in the United States between 2009 and 2015.2009 年至 2015 年美国全国门诊抑酸剂处方的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 30;13(11):e0208461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208461. eCollection 2018.
4
Multifaceted intervention to curb in-hospital over-prescription of proton pump inhibitors: A longitudinal multicenter quasi-experimental before-and-after study.多方位干预遏制质子泵抑制剂院内超说明书用药:一项纵向多中心准实验前后研究。
Eur J Intern Med. 2018 Apr;50:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
5
Proton pump inhibitor utilisation and potentially inappropriate prescribing analysis: insights from a single-centred retrospective study.质子泵抑制剂的利用与潜在不适当处方分析:来自单中心回顾性研究的见解。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 26;10(11):e040473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040473.
6
Prescribing Patterns of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Germany: A Retrospective Study Including 472 146 Patients.质子泵抑制剂在德国的处方模式:一项包括 472146 名患者的回顾性研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231221002. doi: 10.1177/21501319231221002.
7
Poor awareness of preventing aspirin-induced gastrointestinal injury with combined protective medications.对联合应用保护药物预防阿司匹林相关胃肠道损伤的认识不足。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun 28;18(24):3167-72. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i24.3167.
8
Evaluation of proton pump inhibitor administration in hospitalized dogs in a tertiary referral hospital.三级转诊医院住院犬质子泵抑制剂给药的评估。
J Vet Intern Med. 2022 Sep;36(5):1622-1627. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16491. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
9
Trends in acid suppressant drug prescriptions in primary care in the UK: a population-based cross-sectional study.英国初级保健中抑酸药物处方的趋势:基于人群的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):e041529. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041529.
10
Association of Early Life Prescriptions for Antibiotics and Acid Suppressants with Childhood Psychotropic Prescriptions.早期抗生素和酸抑制剂处方与儿童精神药物处方的关联。
J Pediatr. 2022 Jul;246:191-198.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.04.030. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilization of Acid Suppressants After Withdrawal of Ranitidine in Korea: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.韩国雷尼替丁撤市后抑酸剂的使用情况:一项中断时间序列分析
J Prev Med Public Health. 2025 Jan;58(1):21-30. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.24.357. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
2
Evolution of proton pump inhibitor prescribing from 2017 to 2021 at 14 secondary and tertiary hospitals in China:a multicentre cross-sectional study.质子泵抑制剂在中国 14 家二级和三级医院的 2017 年至 2021 年的处方演变:一项多中心横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 3;13(7):e072793. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072793.

本文引用的文献

1
Proton pump inhibitor utilisation and potentially inappropriate prescribing analysis: insights from a single-centred retrospective study.质子泵抑制剂的利用与潜在不适当处方分析:来自单中心回顾性研究的见解。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 26;10(11):e040473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040473.
2
Continuous improvement on the rationality of prophylactic injectable PPIs usage by a clinical pharmacist-led guidance team at a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital.中国一家三级教学医院的临床药师主导的指导团队对预防性注射用质子泵抑制剂使用合理性的持续改进。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Oct;48(10):300060520954729. doi: 10.1177/0300060520954729.
3
Appropriateness of proton pump inhibitors treatment in clinical practice: Prospective evaluation in outpatients and perspective assessment of drug optimisation.
质子泵抑制剂治疗在临床实践中的适宜性:门诊患者的前瞻性评估和药物优化的前瞻性评估。
Dig Liver Dis. 2020 Aug;52(8):862-868. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
Physicians' Perceptions of Proton Pump Inhibitor Risks and Recommendations to Discontinue: A National Survey.医生对质子泵抑制剂风险的认知及停药建议:一项全国性调查。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 May;115(5):689-696. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000558.
5
The inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors during admission and after discharge: a prospective cross-sectional study.质子泵抑制剂在住院期间和出院后的不当使用:一项前瞻性横断面研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Feb;42(1):174-183. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00955-8. Epub 2019 Dec 21.
6
Awareness, attitude and behavior regarding proton pump inhibitor among medical staff in the Southwest of China.中国西南地区医务人员质子泵抑制剂认知、态度和行为。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):880. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4725-6.
7
Proton pump inhibitors, adverse events and increased risk of mortality.质子泵抑制剂、不良事件与死亡率升高。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019 Nov;18(11):1043-1053. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2019.1664470. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
8
Prescribing of proton-pump inhibitors: auditing the management and reasons for prescribing in Danish general practice.质子泵抑制剂的处方:丹麦普通实践中质子泵抑制剂处方管理和处方原因的审核。
Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 18;36(6):758-764. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz025.
9
Synergistic effects of liposomes encapsulating atorvastatin calcium and curcumin and targeting dysfunctional endothelial cells in reducing atherosclerosis.脂质体包载阿托伐他汀钙和姜黄素协同作用及其对功能失调内皮细胞的靶向作用在减少动脉粥样硬化中的作用。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2019 Jan 15;14:649-665. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S189819. eCollection 2019.
10
A cross-sectional study of national outpatient gastric acid suppressant prescribing in the United States between 2009 and 2015.2009 年至 2015 年美国全国门诊抑酸剂处方的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 30;13(11):e0208461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208461. eCollection 2018.