Jessen Marie Kristine, Andersen Lars Wiuff, Thomsen Marie-Louise Holm, Kristensen Peter, Hayeri Wazhma, Hassel Ranva Espegård, Perner Anders, Petersen Jens Aage Kølsen, Kirkegaard Hans
Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, J103, DK-8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Mar 29;8(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01034-y.
Intravenous fluids are often used in the treatment of sepsis. The better strategy regarding fluid volume is debated, but preliminary data in patients with septic shock or sepsis-related hypotension favor restrictive fluid administration. We describe the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Restrictive Fluid Administration vs. Standard of Care in Emergency Department Sepsis Patients (REFACED Sepsis)-a multicenter, randomized clinical proof-of-concept trial. The aim of the REFACED Sepsis trial is to test if a restrictive intravenous fluid protocol in emergency department patients with sepsis without shock is feasible and decreases the intravenous fluid volume administered in comparison to standard care.
This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-labeled, feasibility trial investigating volumes of crystalloid fluid within 24 h in 124 patients with sepsis without shock enrolled at three emergency departments in the Central Denmark Region. Patients are allocated to two different intravenous fluid regimens: a restrictive approach using four trigger criteria for fluid administration vs. standard care. The primary, feasibility outcome is total intravenous, crystalloid fluid volume within 24 h, and key secondary outcomes include protocol violations, total fluids (intravenous and oral) within 24 h, and serious adverse reactions and suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions. Status: The trial started in November 2021, and the last patient is anticipated to be included in January 2022.
Sepsis is very common in emergency department patients and fluid administration is very frequently administered in these patients. However, the evidence to guide fluid administration is very sparse. This feasibility trial will be the foundation for a potential future large-scale trial investigating restrictive vs. standard fluid administration in patients with sepsis.
EudraCT number: 2021-000224-35 (date: 2021 May 03), ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05076435 (date: 2021 October 13), Committee on Health Research Ethics - Central Denmark Region: 1-10-72-163-21 (date: 2021 June 28).
静脉输液常用于脓毒症的治疗。关于输液量的更佳策略存在争议,但脓毒性休克或脓毒症相关低血压患者的初步数据支持限制性液体管理。我们描述了急诊科脓毒症患者限制性液体管理与标准治疗对照试验(REFACED Sepsis)的方案和统计分析计划,这是一项多中心、随机临床概念验证试验。REFACED Sepsis试验的目的是检验在无休克的急诊科脓毒症患者中,与标准治疗相比,限制性静脉输液方案是否可行并能减少静脉输液量。
这是一项由研究者发起的、多中心、随机、平行组、开放标签的可行性试验,在丹麦中部地区的三个急诊科纳入124例无休克的脓毒症患者,研究24小时内晶体液的输注量。患者被分配到两种不同的静脉输液方案:一种是采用四个输液触发标准的限制性方法,另一种是标准治疗。主要的可行性结局是24小时内静脉输注晶体液的总量,关键次要结局包括方案违背情况、24小时内的总液体量(静脉和口服)以及严重不良反应和疑似意外严重不良反应。状态:该试验于2021年11月开始,预计最后一名患者将于2022年1月入组。
脓毒症在急诊科患者中非常常见,这些患者经常接受液体输注。然而,指导液体输注的证据非常稀少。这项可行性试验将为未来一项潜在的大规模试验奠定基础,该试验将研究脓毒症患者的限制性与标准液体管理。
欧盟临床试验注册号:2021-000224-35(日期:2021年5月3日),美国国立医学图书馆临床试验注册号:NCT05076435(日期:2021年10月13日),丹麦中部地区卫生研究伦理委员会:1-10-72-163-21(日期:2021年6月28日)。