Department of Nutrition and Food Science, California State University, Chico, CA.
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2022 May;54(5):406-411. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
To measure the internal consistency reliability of 3 weight bias scales among nutrition and dietetics students enrolled at a public university in Ghana and to use the Fat Phobia Scale (FPS) to determine the prevalence of weight bias and the differences in gender and body mass index.
Online survey gathered self-reported height, weight, and demographic data. Explicit weight bias was assessed using validated FPS, Beliefs About Obese People, and Attitudes Toward Obese Persons scales.
Sample of 172 students.
Prevalence of weight bias.
Cronbach α reliability test was used to measure the internal consistency of scales. The prevalence of weight bias was expressed as a percentage. Independent t tests and analysis of variance were used to explore differences in gender and weight categories.
The reliability scores for FPS, Beliefs About Obese People, and Attitudes Toward Obese Persons scales were 0.92, 0.51, and 0.38, respectively. About 53% of participants expressed weight bias. A significant difference was observed for weight bias between overweight and obese participants, with participants with obesity showing greater weight bias (P = 0.03).
Fat Phobia Scale (most reliable) identified more than half of the students had a negative attitude toward obesity. Weight bias training within this population may improve attitudes toward obesity.
测量加纳一所公立大学营养与饮食学专业学生使用三种体重偏见量表的内部一致性信度,并使用肥胖恐惧症量表(FPS)来确定体重偏见的流行程度,以及性别和体重指数的差异。
在线调查收集了自我报告的身高、体重和人口统计学数据。使用经过验证的 FPS、肥胖人群信念和肥胖人群态度量表来评估明确的体重偏见。
172 名学生的样本。
体重偏见的流行程度。
使用克朗巴赫 α 可靠性测试来衡量量表的内部一致性。体重偏见的流行程度以百分比表示。使用独立 t 检验和方差分析来探索性别和体重类别之间的差异。
FPS、肥胖人群信念和肥胖人群态度量表的可靠性评分为 0.92、0.51 和 0.38。约 53%的参与者表达了体重偏见。超重和肥胖参与者之间的体重偏见存在显著差异,肥胖参与者表现出更大的体重偏见(P=0.03)。
肥胖恐惧症量表(最可靠)识别出一半以上的学生对肥胖持负面态度。在该人群中进行体重偏见培训可能会改善对肥胖的态度。