加强公共卫生系统评价：第二版《 Cochrane 干预系统评价手册》中的指导。
Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd edition.
机构信息
Cochrane Public Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia.
Methods in Evidence Synthesis Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
出版信息
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Dec 1;44(4):e588-e592. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac036.
AIMS
Decision makers in public health practice and policy rely on access to trustworthy, relevant, synthesized evidence. The second edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions ('the Handbook') reflects a major revision in guidance for authors of systematic reviews, incorporating a decade of methodological development and a number of significant changes to previous recommendations. This paper aims to highlight new guidance that addresses a number of key methodological challenges for authors of systematic reviews in public health.
RESULTS
The revised Handbook includes guidance on framing public health research questions for synthesis, considering equity, intervention complexity, risk of bias assessment and synthesis methods other than meta-analysis. Reviews of public health interventions frequently encounter the types of methodological complexity addressed in this new guidance.
CONCLUSION
We hope that readers will find that the Cochrane Handbook includes detailed and thoughtful guidance on both conceptualizing and executing systematic reviews relevant to public health questions. Considering the available methods guidance will, we hope, provide support for authors of public health reviews to tackle the challenges they encounter, strengthen their analysis and provide useful answers to the important questions asked by stakeholders and users of public health evidence.
目的
公共卫生实践和政策的决策者依赖于获取可信赖、相关和综合的证据。《干预措施系统评价 Cochrane 手册》（第二版）（以下简称《手册》）反映了对系统评价作者指南的重大修订，纳入了十年来的方法学发展和对先前建议的一些重大改变。本文旨在强调为公共卫生系统评价作者解决若干关键方法学挑战的新指南。
结果
修订后的《手册》包括了为综合研究制定公共卫生研究问题的框架、考虑公平性、干预复杂性、偏倚风险评估以及除 meta 分析以外的综合方法的指南。公共卫生干预措施的评价经常遇到新指南中所涉及的这类方法学复杂性问题。
结论
我们希望读者会发现，《Cochrane 手册》包括了针对公共卫生问题的系统评价的概念化和执行方面的详细和深思熟虑的指南。我们希望，考虑到现有的方法学指南，将为公共卫生评价的作者提供支持，以应对他们所遇到的挑战，加强他们的分析，并为利益相关者和公共卫生证据使用者提出的重要问题提供有用的答案。
Zotero 插件