Suppr超能文献

“重 paper 不重 patient”:护士和患者对医院综合风险评估和护理计划文档记录的体验。

'Paper care not patient care': Nurse and patient experiences of comprehensive risk assessment and care plan documentation in hospital.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Public Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Canberra Health Services and ACT Health, SYNERGY Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Canberra Hospital, Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2023 Feb;32(3-4):523-538. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16291. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To explore organisation-wide experiences of person-centred care and risk assessment practices using existing healthcare organisation documentation.

BACKGROUND

There is increasing emphasis on multidimensional risk assessments during hospital admission. However, little is known about how nurses use multidimensional assessment documentation in clinical practice to address preventable harms and optimise person-centred care.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive study reported according to COREQ.

METHODS

Metropolitan tertiary hospital and rehabilitation hospital servicing a population of 550,000. A sample of 111 participants (12 patients, 4 family members/carers, 94 nurses and 1 allied health professional) from a range of wards/clinical locations. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted at two time points. The audio recording was transcribed, and an inductive thematic analysis was used to provide insight from multiple perspectives.

RESULTS

Three main themes emerged: (1) 'What works well in practice' included: efficiency in the structure of the documentation; the Introduction, Situation, Background Assessment, Recommendation (ISBAR) framework and prompting for clinical decision-making were valued by nurses; and direct patient care is always prioritised. (2) 'What does not work well in practice': obtaining the patient's signature on daily care plans; multidisciplinary (MDT) involvement; duplication of paperwork and person-centred goals are not well-captured in care plan documentation. (3) 'Experience of care'; satisfaction of person-centred care; communication in the MDT was important, but sometimes insufficient; patients had variable involvement in their daily care plan; and inadequate integration of care between MDT team which negatively impacted patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficient and streamlined documentation systems should herald feedback from nurses to address their clinical workflow needs and can support, and capture, their decision-making that enables partnership with patients to improve the individualisation of care provision.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The integration of effective MDT involvement in clinical documentation was problematic and resulted in unmet supportive care from the patient's perspective.

摘要

目的和目标

利用现有的医疗机构文档,探索以患者为中心的护理和风险评估实践的全组织经验。

背景

在住院期间,对多维风险评估的重视程度越来越高。然而,对于护士如何在临床实践中使用多维评估文档来解决可预防的伤害并优化以患者为中心的护理,知之甚少。

设计

按照 COREQ 报告的定性描述性研究。

方法

大都会三级医院和康复医院,为 550000 人口提供服务。从多个病房/临床地点招募了 111 名参与者(12 名患者、4 名家属/照顾者、94 名护士和 1 名联合健康专业人员)作为样本。在两个时间点进行了半结构化访谈和焦点小组。对音频记录进行了转录,并使用归纳主题分析从多个角度提供了深入了解。

结果

出现了三个主要主题:(1)“实践中效果良好的方面”包括:文档结构效率高;护士重视介绍、情况、背景评估、建议(ISBAR)框架和提示进行临床决策;始终优先考虑直接患者护理。(2)“实践中效果不佳的方面”:在日常护理计划上获得患者签名;多学科团队(MDT)参与;文书工作和以患者为中心的目标的重复,在护理计划文档中没有很好地捕捉到。(3)“护理体验”:以患者为中心的护理满意度;MDT 中的沟通很重要,但有时不够充分;患者在其日常护理计划中有不同程度的参与;MDT 团队之间的护理整合不足,对患者产生负面影响。

结论

高效精简的文档系统应预示着护士的反馈,以满足他们的临床工作流程需求,并支持和捕捉他们的决策,使患者能够合作改善护理服务的个性化。

对临床实践的相关性

MDT 有效参与临床文档记录存在问题,导致从患者的角度来看,支持性护理没有得到满足。

相似文献

2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
The impact of single and shared rooms on family-centred care in children's hospitals.
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Jun;26(11-12):1584-1596. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13485. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
6
Nurses' experiences of caring for older patients afflicted by delirium in a neurological department.
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Mar;28(5-6):920-930. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14709. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
7
Exploring Clinical Decision-Making among the Uro-oncology Multidisciplinary Team: A Qualitative Study.
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2023 Aug;39(4):151447. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151447. Epub 2023 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving documentation and junior doctor confidence on COVID-19 ward rounds using a ward round pro forma.
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Mar;21(Suppl 2):17-18. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.21-2-s17.
2
Is nursing and midwifery clinical documentation a burden? An empirical study of perception versus reality.
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jun;30(11-12):1645-1652. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15718. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Transitioning From Hospital to Palliative Care at Home: Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of Continuity of Care.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Aug;62(2):233-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.12.019. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
5
Designing paper-based records to improve the quality of nursing documentation in hospitals: A scoping review.
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jan;30(1-2):56-71. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15545. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
6
The sum of us. Implementing a Person Centred Care Bundle - A narrative inquiry.
Appl Nurs Res. 2020 Oct;55:151276. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151276. Epub 2020 May 3.
7
The impact of person-centred care on patient safety: An umbrella review of systematic reviews.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103658. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103658. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
8
Whose centre is it anyway? Defining person-centred care in nursing: An integrative review.
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 10;15(3):e0229923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229923. eCollection 2020.
10
Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD006211. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006211.pub3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验