School of Nursing, Midwifery and Public Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Canberra Health Services and ACT Health, SYNERGY Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Canberra Hospital, Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Feb;32(3-4):523-538. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16291. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
To explore organisation-wide experiences of person-centred care and risk assessment practices using existing healthcare organisation documentation.
There is increasing emphasis on multidimensional risk assessments during hospital admission. However, little is known about how nurses use multidimensional assessment documentation in clinical practice to address preventable harms and optimise person-centred care.
A qualitative descriptive study reported according to COREQ.
Metropolitan tertiary hospital and rehabilitation hospital servicing a population of 550,000. A sample of 111 participants (12 patients, 4 family members/carers, 94 nurses and 1 allied health professional) from a range of wards/clinical locations. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted at two time points. The audio recording was transcribed, and an inductive thematic analysis was used to provide insight from multiple perspectives.
Three main themes emerged: (1) 'What works well in practice' included: efficiency in the structure of the documentation; the Introduction, Situation, Background Assessment, Recommendation (ISBAR) framework and prompting for clinical decision-making were valued by nurses; and direct patient care is always prioritised. (2) 'What does not work well in practice': obtaining the patient's signature on daily care plans; multidisciplinary (MDT) involvement; duplication of paperwork and person-centred goals are not well-captured in care plan documentation. (3) 'Experience of care'; satisfaction of person-centred care; communication in the MDT was important, but sometimes insufficient; patients had variable involvement in their daily care plan; and inadequate integration of care between MDT team which negatively impacted patients.
Efficient and streamlined documentation systems should herald feedback from nurses to address their clinical workflow needs and can support, and capture, their decision-making that enables partnership with patients to improve the individualisation of care provision.
The integration of effective MDT involvement in clinical documentation was problematic and resulted in unmet supportive care from the patient's perspective.
利用现有的医疗机构文档,探索以患者为中心的护理和风险评估实践的全组织经验。
在住院期间,对多维风险评估的重视程度越来越高。然而,对于护士如何在临床实践中使用多维评估文档来解决可预防的伤害并优化以患者为中心的护理,知之甚少。
按照 COREQ 报告的定性描述性研究。
大都会三级医院和康复医院,为 550000 人口提供服务。从多个病房/临床地点招募了 111 名参与者(12 名患者、4 名家属/照顾者、94 名护士和 1 名联合健康专业人员)作为样本。在两个时间点进行了半结构化访谈和焦点小组。对音频记录进行了转录,并使用归纳主题分析从多个角度提供了深入了解。
出现了三个主要主题:(1)“实践中效果良好的方面”包括:文档结构效率高;护士重视介绍、情况、背景评估、建议(ISBAR)框架和提示进行临床决策;始终优先考虑直接患者护理。(2)“实践中效果不佳的方面”:在日常护理计划上获得患者签名;多学科团队(MDT)参与;文书工作和以患者为中心的目标的重复,在护理计划文档中没有很好地捕捉到。(3)“护理体验”:以患者为中心的护理满意度;MDT 中的沟通很重要,但有时不够充分;患者在其日常护理计划中有不同程度的参与;MDT 团队之间的护理整合不足,对患者产生负面影响。
高效精简的文档系统应预示着护士的反馈,以满足他们的临床工作流程需求,并支持和捕捉他们的决策,使患者能够合作改善护理服务的个性化。
MDT 有效参与临床文档记录存在问题,导致从患者的角度来看,支持性护理没有得到满足。