• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智利成年人的规范鼻共鸣值。

Normative nasalance scores in Chilean adults.

机构信息

Departamento de Fonoaudiología, Universidad de Chile - Santiago, Chile.

Fundación Gantz - Hospital del Niño con Fisura - Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Codas. 2022 Mar 25;34(6):e20210152. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021152. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20212021152
PMID:35352792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9886296/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The present study is aimed towards determining and comparing normative nasalance scores in Chilean Spanish-speaking adult men and women.

METHODS

40 women (age range 18 to 35, X = 25.79, SD = 5.83) and 36 men (age range 18 to 35, X = 26.45, SD = 4.08) were invited to participate, all of them without any previous speech therapy, neurological pathologies, intellectual deficits, hearing loss, syndromes, or other diagnosed pathologies that could impact speech production.A study of proper velopharyngeal function was performed, using a perceptual resonance evaluation. Nasalance was determined using a model 6450 Nasometer, during the reading of three standardized speech samples in Spanish: a nasal passage (NP), an oronasal passage (ONP), and an oral passage (OP). Also, the nasalance distance was calculated. Genders were compared using Wilcoxon tests for independent samples.

RESULTS

The NP presented the highest percentage of nasalance, with 52.13% (± 4.73), followed by the ONP with 25.38% (± 3.7), and finally the OP, which presented the lowest value of 14.15% (± 5.03). Meanwhile, nasalance distance was 37.98% (± 5.32). Finally, no significant differences were observed when comparing the nasalance between genders (p >0.05).

CONCLUSION

The nasalance values obtained were similar to those observed for other Spanish speakers. Also, male and women showed similar scores. The results of this study are a contribution to the indirect assessment of velopharyngeal function in Chilean adults.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定并比较智利西班牙语成年男女的正常鼻化率。

方法

邀请 40 名女性(年龄 18-35 岁,X=25.79,SD=5.83)和 36 名男性(年龄 18-35 岁,X=26.45,SD=4.08)参与研究,所有参与者均无言语治疗史、神经病理学、智力缺陷、听力损失、综合征或其他可能影响言语产生的已诊断疾病。使用感知共鸣评估对适当的软腭功能进行了研究。使用型号 6450 Nasometer 进行了鼻音测量,在阅读三个西班牙语标准化语音样本时:鼻腔音(NP)、口鼻音(ONP)和口腔音(OP)。同时,计算了鼻音距离。使用 Wilcoxon 独立样本检验比较了性别。

结果

NP 呈现出最高的鼻化率,为 52.13%(±4.73),其次是 ONP,为 25.38%(±3.7),最后是 OP,其值最低,为 14.15%(±5.03)。同时,鼻音距离为 37.98%(±5.32)。最后,性别之间的鼻音差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。

结论

所获得的鼻化率与其他西班牙语使用者相似。此外,男性和女性的得分相似。本研究的结果为间接评估智利成年人的软腭功能做出了贡献。

相似文献

1
Normative nasalance scores in Chilean adults.智利成年人的规范鼻共鸣值。
Codas. 2022 Mar 25;34(6):e20210152. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021152. eCollection 2022.
2
Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults.弗拉芒年轻成年人言语中正常鼻共鸣的鼻测量值。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001 Mar;38(2):112-8. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_2001_038_0112_nvfnnr_2.0.co_2.
3
Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children.韩国正常成人和儿童的鼻音评估分数。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Feb;67(2):173-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.10.035. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
4
Normative data on nasalance scores for Farsi speaking children: Influence of age, gender and phonetic context.说波斯语儿童鼻音计分数的标准数据:年龄、性别和语音语境的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Dec;127:109680. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109680. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
5
Normal Patterns of Nasometric Values in Adult Jordanian Speakers of Arabic.成年约旦阿拉伯语使用者的鼻测量值正常模式
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Nov;29(8):2043-2047. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004719.
6
Nasalance scores for typical Irish English-speaking adults.典型爱尔兰英语成年使用者的鼻漏气率得分。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2013 Dec;38(4):167-72. doi: 10.3109/14015439.2012.679965. Epub 2012 May 14.
7
Standardization of nasalance scores in normal Saudi speakers.沙特正常说话者鼻音评分的标准化
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2015 Jul;40(2):77-85. doi: 10.3109/14015439.2014.907339. Epub 2014 May 22.
8
Normative nasalance scores in the production of words and syllables for Brazilian Portuguese speakers.巴西葡萄牙语使用者在单词和音节发音中的标准鼻化率得分。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(12):1139-1148. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2019.1590733. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
9
Normative nasalance scores for Estonian children.爱沙尼亚儿童的标准鼻声计评分
Clin Linguist Phon. 2018;32(11):1054-1066. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1495767. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
10
Speech stimuli and nasalance scores for the assessment of resonance in in Mandarin speaking Malaysian children.用于评估马来西亚讲普通话儿童共鸣的语音刺激和鼻共鸣率得分。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2020 Jun 2;34(6):554-565. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2019.1668480. Epub 2019 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Normative Nasalance Scores for Brazilian Portuguese Using New Speech Stimuli.使用新语音刺激的巴西葡萄牙语标准鼻音评分
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2015;67(5):238-44. doi: 10.1159/000441976. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
2
Instrumental assessment of velopharyngeal function and resonance: a review.腭咽功能与共鸣的仪器评估:综述
J Commun Disord. 2014 Nov-Dec;52:170-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 26.
3
Nasalance scores for normal Korean-speaking adults and children.韩国正常成人和儿童的鼻音评估分数。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Feb;67(2):173-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.10.035. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
4
Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the nasometers 6200 and 6450.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014 Jan;51(1):90-7. doi: 10.1597/12-202. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
5
Nasometer 6200 Versus Nasometer II 6400: Effect on Measures of Nasalance.Nasometer 6200与Nasometer II 6400:对鼻漏气测量的影响
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013 May;50(3):268-74. doi: 10.1597/11-219. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
6
Effects of computer system and vowel loading on measures of nasalance.计算机系统和元音负荷对鼻共鸣度测量值的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Oct;54(5):1284-94. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0201). Epub 2011 Apr 15.
7
Universal parameters for reporting speech outcomes in individuals with cleft palate.腭裂患者言语结果报告的通用参数。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008 Jan;45(1):1-17. doi: 10.1597/06-086.1.
8
Speech evaluation of velopharyngeal dysfunction.腭咽功能障碍的语音评估
J Craniofac Surg. 2007 Mar;18(2):251-61; quiz 266-7. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31803ecf3b.
9
Test-retest nasalance score variability in hypernasal speakers.高鼻音患者鼻音计分数的重测变异性。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 Jul;43(4):415-9. doi: 10.1597/05-104.1.
10
Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal System.使用鼻声计、鼻内镜和口鼻系统获得的鼻声测量分数的比较。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Jul;42(4):423-33. doi: 10.1597/03-029.1.