Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Integr Complement Med. 2022 Jun;28(6):484-496. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2021.0427. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) has been found effective for improving chronic low-back pain (cLBP). However, little data exist regarding how attractive this technique is to Americans as a therapy for cLBP. Survey of randomly selected persons with cLBP. Respondents were recruited from Kaiser Permanente Washington and one-time surveys were completed online. Adults 18-80 years of age with cLBP. The study was conducted between December 2019 and August 2020. The survey described an evidence-based classic MBSR course and then asked respondents about their sociodemographic characteristics, their current back pain, previous back pain treatments, behavioral risk factors for back pain, and four outcomes indicative of intention to engage in MBSR. Four-hundred fifty-seven respondents completed the survey. Respondents were primarily women, white, educated, and with back pain for more than 5 years. About half had previously used a mind-body therapy for their pain. Overall, they reported moderate to high intention to try mindfulness classes and practice at home (median of 5 with 50% of the observations between 4 and 6, and 5.7, 50% of the observations between 4.3 and 6.3, respectively, on a 7-point scale). They reported a willingness to spend a median of 3 h/week learning mindfulness and 3.5 h/week practicing mindfulness techniques (for both outcomes, 50% of the respondents reported between 2 and 5 h). Few patient characteristics predicted intention to engage in MBSR, with no variable predicting all outcomes. The magnitude of the effect associated with significant predictors was small. Classic MBSR appealed to many survey respondents, in that they reported high interest in learning MBSR and intention to practice at home. The amount of time they reported being willing to spend learning MBSR and practicing at home is consistent with the time commitment in the original course.
正念减压疗法(MBSR)已被证明对改善慢性下腰痛(cLBP)有效。然而,关于该技术作为 cLBP 治疗方法对美国人的吸引力有多少,几乎没有数据。对随机选择的患有 cLBP 的人的调查。受访者从 Kaiser Permanente Washington 招募,并在线完成一次性调查。18-80 岁患有 cLBP 的成年人。该研究于 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 8 月进行。该调查描述了一个基于证据的经典 MBSR 课程,然后询问受访者他们的社会人口统计学特征、他们当前的背部疼痛、以前的背部疼痛治疗、背部疼痛的行为风险因素,以及四个表明参与 MBSR 意向的结果。457 名受访者完成了调查。受访者主要是女性、白人、受过教育,并且腰痛超过 5 年。大约一半的人以前曾使用身心疗法来治疗他们的疼痛。总体而言,他们报告说有中等至高度的意愿尝试正念课程并在家中练习(中位数为 5,50%的观察值在 4 和 6 之间,中位数为 5.7,50%的观察值在 4.3 和 6.3 之间,分别在 7 点量表上)。他们表示愿意每周花中位数 3 小时学习正念,每周花中位数 3.5 小时练习正念技术(对于这两个结果,50%的受访者报告说在 2 到 5 小时之间)。很少有患者特征预测参与 MBSR 的意愿,没有变量预测所有结果。与显著预测因子相关的效应大小很小。经典 MBSR 吸引了许多调查受访者,因为他们报告说对学习 MBSR 很感兴趣,并有意在家中练习。他们报告愿意花在学习 MBSR 和在家中练习的时间与原始课程的时间承诺一致。