• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮质 versus 松质脱溶剂冻干骨同种异体移植物用于牙槽嵴保存:一项组织学研究。

Cortical Versus Cancellous Solvent-Dehydrated Bone Allograft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Histologic Study.

出版信息

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Mar-Apr;42(2):215-223. doi: 10.11607/prd.5563.

DOI:10.11607/prd.5563
PMID:35353091
Abstract

Allografts have been routinely used for immediate grafting of extraction sites as modalities of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP). Solvent-dehydrated bone allograft (SDBA), which is commonly utilized for socket grafting, exists in the form of cortical and cancellous particles. This study aims to provide a histologic comparison of cortical and cancellous SDBA for ARP. A total of 35 extraction sockets were allocated to receive either a cortical (17 sites) or cancellous (18 sites) SDBA, followed by application of a resorbable collagen wound dressing in both groups. At approximately 4 months, a bone core biopsy sample was obtained during implant placement. Histomorphometric assessment was then conducted to compare the differences between both forms of SDBA. Within its limitations, a higher percentage of vital bone was observed in the cortical bone group compared to the cancellous bone group (28.6% vs 20.1%, respectively, P = .042), while there was a lack of statistically significant differences among other fractions of the bone biopsy sample (residual graft particles and nonmineralized tissues such as connective tissue or other components).

摘要

同种异体移植物已被常规用于拔牙窝的即刻移植,作为牙槽嵴保存(ARP)的手段。溶剂脱水骨同种异体移植物(SDBA)常用于牙槽窝植骨,呈皮质和松质颗粒状。本研究旨在对 ARP 中皮质和松质 SDBA 进行组织学比较。共将 35 个拔牙窝分配给皮质 SDBA(17 个部位)或松质 SDBA(18 个部位),两组均应用可吸收胶原创面敷料。大约 4 个月后,在植入物放置期间获得骨芯活检样本。然后进行组织形态计量评估,以比较两种形式的 SDBA 之间的差异。在其局限性内,皮质骨组的活骨百分比高于松质骨组(分别为 28.6%和 20.1%,P =.042),而骨活检样本的其他部分(残留移植物颗粒和未矿化组织,如结缔组织或其他成分)之间没有统计学上的显著差异。

相似文献

1
Cortical Versus Cancellous Solvent-Dehydrated Bone Allograft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Histologic Study.皮质 versus 松质脱溶剂冻干骨同种异体移植物用于牙槽嵴保存:一项组织学研究。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 Mar-Apr;42(2):215-223. doi: 10.11607/prd.5563.
2
Evaluation of healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using cortical versus cancellous freeze-dried bone allograft.使用皮质骨与松质骨冻干同种异体骨进行牙槽嵴保存的拔牙后愈合情况评估。
J Periodontol. 2014 Apr;85(4):514-24. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.130178. Epub 2013 May 31.
3
Histologic healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized versus combined mineralized-demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.使用矿化与矿化-脱矿冻干骨同种异体移植进行牙槽嵴保存的拔牙后组织学愈合:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Periodontol. 2015 Mar;86(3):348-55. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.140483. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
4
Ridge preservation following tooth extraction using mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft compared to mineralized solvent-dehydrated bone allograft: A randomized controlled clinical trial.采用脱矿冻干骨和脱矿溶剂脱水骨进行拔牙后牙槽嵴保存的比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Periodontol. 2019 Feb;90(2):126-133. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0199. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
5
Histologic wound healing in studies using different ridge preservation protocols: A review.不同牙槽骨保存术式研究中的组织学愈合:综述。
Clin Adv Periodontics. 2024 Mar;14(1):52-62. doi: 10.1002/cap.10281. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
6
Histologic Evaluation of Wound Healing After Ridge Preservation With Cortical, Cancellous, and Combined Cortico-Cancellous Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.皮质骨、松质骨和皮质松质联合冻干骨移植物在牙槽嵴保存后愈合的组织学评价:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Periodontol. 2017 Sep;88(9):860-868. doi: 10.1902/jop.2017.170155. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
7
Histologic comparison of healing after tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized versus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft.对比使用矿化冻干骨与脱矿冻干骨进行牙槽嵴保存术后拔牙创口愈合的组织学表现。
J Periodontol. 2012 Mar;83(3):329-36. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110270. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
8
Time analysis of alveolar ridge preservation using a combination of mineralized bone-plug and dense-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane: A histomorphometric study.应用矿化骨塞和高密度聚四氟乙烯膜进行牙槽嵴保存的时间分析:一项组织形态计量学研究。
J Periodontol. 2020 Feb;91(2):215-222. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0142. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
9
A Histologic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of an Allograft, Xenograft, and Alloplast Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Humans: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.异体、异种和人工移植物用于牙槽嵴保存的组织学和组织形态计量学评价:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Oral Implantol. 2022 Dec 1;48(6):541-549. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00012.
10
Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study.异种移植与单纯拔牙后牙槽嵴保存:一项临床和组织形态计量学研究。
J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1370-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070628.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of an Autologous Dentin Matrix for Alveolar Ridge Preservation.自体牙本质基质用于牙槽嵴保存的疗效比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Aug 8;60(8):1280. doi: 10.3390/medicina60081280.