Suppr超能文献

经颅交流电刺激治疗抑郁症:一项随机对照试验。

Transcranial alternating current stimulation for treating depression: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Division of Neuropsychiatry and Psychosomatics, Department of Neurology, Beijing Psychosomatic Disease Consultation Center, Xuanwu Hospital, National Center for Neurological Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.

Institute of Sleep and Consciousness Disorders, Center of Epilepsy, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.

出版信息

Brain. 2022 Mar 29;145(1):83-91. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab252.

Abstract

Treatment of depression with antidepressants is partly effective. Transcranial alternating current stimulation can provide a non-pharmacological alternative for adult patients with major depressive disorder. However, no study has used the stimulation to treat first-episode and drug-naïve patients with major depressive disorder. We used a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled design to examine the clinical efficacy and safety of the stimulation in treating first-episode drug-naïve patients in a Chinese Han population. From 4 June 2018 to 30 December 2019, 100 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to receive 20 daily 40-min, 77.5 Hz, 15 mA, one forehead and two mastoid sessions of active or sham stimulation (n = 50 for each group) in four consecutive weeks (Week 4), and were followed for additional 4-week efficacy/safety assessment without stimulation (Week 8). The primary outcome was a remission rate defined as the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) score ≤ 7 at Week 8. Secondary analyses were response rates (defined as a reduction of ≥ 50% in the HDRS-17), changes in depressive symptoms and severity from baseline to Week 4 and Week 8, and rates of adverse events. Data were analysed in an intention-to-treat sample. Forty-nine in the active and 46 in the sham completed the study. Twenty-seven of 50 (54%) in the active treatment group and 9 of 50 (18%) in the sham group achieved remission at the end of Week 8. The remission rate was significantly higher in the active group compared to that in the sham group with a risk ratio of 1.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.29, 2.47). Compared with the sham, the active group had a significantly higher remission rate at Week 4, response rates at Weeks 4 and 8, and a larger reduction in depressive symptoms from baseline to Weeks 4 and 8. Adverse events were similar between the groups. In conclusion, the stimulation on the frontal cortex and two mastoids significantly improved symptoms in first-episode drug-naïve patients with major depressive disorder and may be considered as a non-pharmacological intervention for them in an outpatient setting.

摘要

抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症部分有效。经颅交流电刺激可为成人重性抑郁障碍患者提供一种非药物治疗的选择。然而,尚无研究使用该刺激治疗首发且未经药物治疗的重性抑郁障碍患者。我们采用随机、双盲、假刺激对照设计,在汉族人群中考察该刺激对首发且未经药物治疗的患者的临床疗效和安全性。2018 年 6 月 4 日至 2019 年 12 月 30 日,共招募 100 例患者,并随机分配至接受为期 4 周的每日 20 次、40 分钟、77.5 Hz、15 mA 的真刺激或假刺激(每组 50 例)。真刺激组采用额部和两侧乳突各 1 个电极,假刺激组采用 2 个假电极。在第 4 周(4 周)进行连续 4 周的治疗,随后在第 8 周(8 周)不进行刺激进行额外 4 周的疗效/安全性评估。主要结局为第 8 周时汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS-17)评分≤7 的缓解率。次要分析包括应答率(定义为 HDRS-17 评分降低≥50%)、第 4 周和第 8 周时抑郁症状和严重程度的变化,以及不良事件的发生率。采用意向治疗样本进行数据分析。真刺激组 49 例和假刺激组 46 例完成研究。第 8 周末,真刺激组 50 例中有 27 例(54%)、假刺激组 50 例中有 9 例(18%)达到缓解。与假刺激相比,真刺激组的缓解率显著更高,风险比为 1.78(95%置信区间为 1.29~2.47)。与假刺激相比,真刺激组第 4 周末的缓解率、第 4 周末和第 8 周末的应答率更高,且第 4 周末和第 8 周末的抑郁症状改善更大。两组的不良事件相似。总之,刺激额区和两侧乳突可显著改善首发且未经药物治疗的重性抑郁障碍患者的症状,在门诊环境下,可考虑将其作为此类患者的一种非药物干预措施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验