Ren Caili, Pagali Sandeep R, Wang Zhen, Kung Simon, Boyapati Renu Bhargavi, Islam Karimul, Li John W, Shelton K Maureen, Waniger Anne, Rydberg Ann M, Hassett Leslie C, Croarkin Paul E, Lundstrom Brian N, Pascual-Leone Alvaro, Lapid Maria I
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Wuxi Central Rehabilitation Hospital, The Affiliated Mental Health Center of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2516459. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16459.
IMPORTANCE: The role and safety of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) for treating depressive disorders remain under evaluation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate tES treatment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and comorbid depressive conditions. DATA SOURCES: A search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, APA PsycINFO, and Scopus databases was conducted from inception to September 17, 2024. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of adults with MDD, depression with psychiatric comorbidities (DPC), or depression with medical comorbidities (DMC), treated with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), or transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), compared with sham or other treatments were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Independent reviewers extracted data in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, with random-effects meta-analysis used for pooling. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were depression severity, response and remission rates, and adverse events. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were reported for continuous outcomes, and odds ratios (ORs) were reported for categorical outcomes. Quality of evidence (QOE) was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 5522 participants from 114 study groups from 88 RCTs (3198 female [58.9%]; mean [range] age, 43.1 [19.4-76.9] years). Most studies (104 study groups from 79 RCTs [91.2%]) evaluated tDCS, while 7 study groups from 6 RCTs (6.1%) evaluated tACS, and 3 study groups from 3 RCTs (2.7%) evaluated tRNS. tES was associated with reduced depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.59; 95% CI, -0.83 to -0.35; low QOE) and improvement in DMC (SMD = -1.05; 95% CI, -1.67 to -0.43; low QOE) and DPC (SMD = -0.78; 95% CI, -1.27 to -0.29; low QOE) compared with MDD (SMD = -0.22; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.01; low QOE). tDCS was associated with reduced depression in DMC (SMD = -1.05; 95% CI, -1.70 to -0.40; very low QOE) and DPC (SMD = -0.88; 95% CI, -1.40 to -0.36; low QOE) but not MDD. tACS was associated with improved MDD symptoms (SMD = -0.58; 95% CI, -0.96 to -0.20; high QOE) and response rates (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.19; high QOE). Combined tDCS and medication was associated with reduced symptoms (SMD = -0.51; 95% CI, -0.90 to -0.13; moderate QOE) and increased response (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.08 to 4.65; high QOE) in MDD. tDCS combined with psychotherapy was not associated with improvement. Subgroup analysis showed that anodal left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex DCS was associated with improved outcomes. Mild to moderate adverse events were more frequent in tES groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, tDCS was associated with improvement in depression among patients with DMC and DPC (with smaller benefits in MDD), tACS was associated with improved MDD outcomes (while tRNS had insufficient evidence) in smaller samples, and combined tDCS and medication was associated with improvement in depression. These findings suggest that tES is well-tolerated overall, with only mild to moderate adverse events, and that future research should optimize stimulation parameters and individualize tES interventions.
重要性:经颅电刺激(tES)治疗抑郁症的作用和安全性仍在评估中。 目的:评估tES对重度抑郁症(MDD)及合并抑郁状态患者的治疗效果。 数据来源:对MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane、美国心理学会心理学文摘数据库(APA PsycINFO)和Scopus数据库进行检索,检索时间从建库至2024年9月17日。 研究选择:纳入对患有MDD、伴有精神共病的抑郁症(DPC)或伴有躯体共病的抑郁症(DMC)的成年人进行经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)、经颅交流电刺激(tACS)或经颅随机噪声刺激(tRNS)治疗,并与假刺激或其他治疗进行比较的随机临床试验(RCT)。 数据提取与合成:独立评审员根据《系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目》2020版指南提取数据,采用随机效应Meta分析进行汇总。 主要结局指标:主要结局为抑郁严重程度、缓解率和不良反应。连续型结局报告标准化均数差(SMD),分类结局报告比值比(OR)。使用推荐分级的评估、制定与评价标准评估证据质量(QOE)。 结果:Meta分析纳入了来自88项RCT的114个研究组的5522名参与者(3198名女性[58.9%];平均[范围]年龄,43.1[19.4 - 76.9]岁)。大多数研究(来自79项RCT的104个研究组[91.2%])评估了tDCS,而来自6项RCT的7个研究组(6.1%)评估了tACS,来自3项RCT的3个研究组(2.7%)评估了tRNS。与MDD(SMD = -0.22;95%CI,-0.44至0.01;低QOE)相比,tES与抑郁症状减轻(SMD = -0.59;95%CI,-0.83至-0.35;低QOE)以及DMC(SMD = -1.05;95%CI,-1.67至-0.43;低QOE)和DPC(SMD = -0.78;95%CI,-1.27至-0.29;低QOE)改善相关。tDCS与DMC(SMD = -1.05;95%CI,-1.70至-0.40;极低QOE)和DPC(SMD = -0.88;95%CI,-1.40至-0.36;低QOE)的抑郁减轻相关,但与MDD无关。tACS与MDD症状改善(SMD = -0.58;95%CI,-0.96至-0.20;高QOE)和缓解率(OR,2.07;95%CI,1.34至3.19;高QOE)相关。tDCS与药物联合使用与MDD症状减轻(SMD = -0.51;95%CI,-0.90至-0.13;中度QOE)和缓解率提高(OR,2.25;95%CI,1.08至4.65;高QOE)相关。tDCS与心理治疗联合使用未显示出改善效果。亚组分析表明,阳极左侧背外侧前额叶皮质DCS与更好的结局相关。tES组中轻度至中度不良事件更为常见。 结论与意义:在这项系统评价和Meta分析中,tDCS与DMC和DPC患者的抑郁改善相关(在MDD中获益较小),tACS与MDD结局改善相关(而tRNS的证据不足),样本量较小,tDCS与药物联合使用与抑郁改善相关。这些发现表明,tES总体耐受性良好,仅伴有轻度至中度不良事件,未来研究应优化刺激参数并使tES干预个体化。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-3-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-4-13
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-5-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-8-2
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-5-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-11-24
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-11-30
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-6-8
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2024-8-31