University of California Irvine Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Orange, California.
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 20;22(4):882-889. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.2.50249.
Increases in emergency department (ED) crowding and boarding are a nationwide issue resulting in worsening patient care and throughput. To compensate, ED administrators often look to modifying staffing models to improve efficiencies.
This study evaluates the impact of implementing the waterfall model of physician staffing on door-to-doctor time (DDOC), door-to-disposition time (DDIS), left without being seen (LWBS) rate, elopement rate, and the number of patient sign-outs. We examined 9,082 pre-intervention ED visits and 8,983 post-intervention ED visits.
The change in DDOC, LWBS rate, and elopement rate demonstrated statistically significant improvement from a mean of 65.1 to 35 minutes (P <0.001), 1.12% to 0.92% (P = 0.004), and 3.96% to 1.95% (P <0.001), respectively. The change in DDIS from 312 to 324.7 minutes was not statistically significant (P = 0.310). The number of patient sign-outs increased after the implementation of a waterfall schedule (P <0.001).
Implementing a waterfall schedule improved DDOC time while decreasing the percentage of patients who LWBS and eloped. The DDIS and number of patient sign-outs appears to have increased post implementation, although this may have been confounded by the increase in patient volumes and ED boarding from the pre- to post-intervention period.
急诊部(ED)拥挤和滞留人数的增加是一个全国性的问题,导致患者的治疗和治疗流程都受到了影响。为了弥补这一问题,ED 管理人员通常会考虑修改人员配备模式以提高效率。
本研究评估了实施医师人员配备瀑布模型对从进入急诊部到看诊时间(DDOC)、从进入急诊部到处置时间(DDIS)、未被诊治离开率(LWBS)、逃跑率以及患者交接次数的影响。我们检查了 9082 例干预前 ED 就诊和 8983 例干预后 ED 就诊。
DDOC、LWBS 率和逃跑率的变化表明,从平均 65.1 分钟到 35 分钟(P<0.001)、1.12%到 0.92%(P=0.004)和 3.96%到 1.95%(P<0.001)分别有统计学显著改善。DDIS 从 312 分钟到 324.7 分钟的变化没有统计学意义(P=0.310)。实施瀑布排班后,患者交接次数增加(P<0.001)。
实施瀑布排班可以缩短 DDOC 时间,同时减少 LWBS 和逃跑的患者比例。DDIS 和患者交接次数似乎在实施后有所增加,尽管这可能与干预前后患者数量和 ED 滞留人数的增加有关。