Good Samaritan Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brockton, Massachusetts.
Michigan State University School of Social Work, East Lansing, Michigan.
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 14;22(4):903-910. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.3.49423.
Expanding on data concerning emergency department (ED) use and avoidance by the sexual minority (those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, other [LGTBQ+]) and gender minority (those who identify as transgender, gender nonconforming, other) community may inform future ED LGTBQ+ training and clinical practice. Investigation objectives included characterizing rates of emergency care avoidance, identifying barriers to emergency care, and assessing emergency care quality and cultural competency for sexual and gender minorities.
In this population-based, cross-sectional needs assessment, sexual minority, gender minority, and/or cisgender heterosexual-identified participants were selected based on participants' subscription to newsletters or social media accounts for One Colorado, an LGBTQ+ advocacy organization. Each participant completed a single digital survey that collected qualitative and quantitative data about ED perception, use, and demographics.
A total of 477 LGBTQ+ or heterosexual-identified individuals (mean age = 44.3 (standard deviation [SD] = 16.7)) participated in the study. Lifetime emergency care avoidance rates for gender minorities were markedly increased (odds ratio [OR] 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2 - 6.6; P <.001), while avoidance rates for sexual minorities were similar to those of cisgender heterosexual respondents (17% vs 14%; P <.001). Gender minorities were more likely than sexual minorities to both avoid emergency care due to fear of discrimination (43% vs 15%; P =.002) and to have experienced discrimination during their last ED visit (OR 11, [95% CI, 5-24]; P <.001). No significant differences were observed between participants in care avoidance due to financial reasons or prior negative experiences. No cited ED factors that influenced identity disclosure decisions were distinctly predictive.
Gender minorities are more likely than sexual minorities and heterosexual cisgender individuals to report ED avoidance and discrimination at last ED visit. Future work characterizing deficits in LGBTQ+ ED care might reduce these avoidance and discrimination rates, enhancing the level of patient care provided to this population.
扩展关于性少数群体(那些自我认同为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、酷儿、其他 [LGBTQ+])和性别少数群体(那些自我认同为跨性别、性别不一致、其他)在急诊科使用和避免使用的数据,可能为未来的急诊科 LGBTQ+培训和临床实践提供信息。调查目的包括描述急诊护理回避率,确定急诊护理障碍,评估急诊护理质量和文化能力,以满足性少数群体和性别少数群体的需求。
在这项基于人群的横断面需求评估中,根据参与者订阅 One Colorado(一个 LGBTQ+ 倡导组织)的通讯或社交媒体账户,选择性少数群体、性别少数群体和/或顺性别异性恋者身份的参与者。每位参与者都完成了一份单一的数字调查,该调查收集了关于急诊科感知、使用和人口统计学的定性和定量数据。
共有 477 名 LGBTQ+ 或顺性别异性恋者身份的个体(平均年龄 = 44.3(标准差 [SD] = 16.7))参与了这项研究。性别少数群体的终身急诊护理回避率明显增加(比值比 [OR] 3.8,95%置信区间 [CI],2.2 - 6.6;P <.001),而性少数群体的回避率与顺性别异性恋者相似(17%对 14%;P <.001)。性别少数群体比性少数群体更有可能因害怕歧视而回避急诊护理(43%比 15%;P =.002),并且在他们最近的急诊就诊期间经历过歧视(OR 11,[95% CI,5-24];P <.001)。由于财务原因或先前负面经历而避免医疗的参与者之间没有观察到显著差异。没有明显的 ED 因素可以预测影响身份披露决策。
性别少数群体比性少数群体和异性恋顺性别者更有可能报告在最近的 ED 就诊中避免和歧视。未来描述 LGBTQ+ED 护理缺陷的工作可能会降低这些回避和歧视率,从而提高向该人群提供的护理水平。