• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与澳大利亚出生间隔相关的产妇因素:一项基于人群的纵向研究结果。

Maternal factors associated with interbirth intervals in Australia: Results from a population-based longitudinal study.

机构信息

School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):728-740. doi: 10.1111/birt.12638. Epub 2022 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1111/birt.12638
PMID:35355322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9790452/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Short and long intervals between successive births are associated with adverse birth outcomes, especially in low-income and middle-income countries, yet the birth intervals in high-income countries remain relatively understudied. The aim was to examine maternal factors associated with birth intervals in Australia.

METHODS

The sample comprised 6130 participants in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health who were born in 1973-1978, had two or more births, and responded to regular surveys between 1996 and 2018. Interbirth interval (IBI) was defined as the time between successive live births. Maternal factors were examined using accelerated failure time models.

RESULTS

For women with only two births (n = 3802), the median time to the second birth was 34.0 months (IQR 23.1, 46.2) with shorter IBI associated with higher socioeconomic status (eg, university education (31.9 months), less income stress (31.1)), and longer IBI associated with age over 35 (39.7), fair/poor health (43.0), untreated fertility problems (45.5), miscarriage (39.4), or abortion (41.0). For women with three or more births (n = 2328), the median times to the second and third births were 31.2 months (19.9, 42.1) and 36.5 months (25.3, 50.1), respectively; some factors were consistent between the first IBI and second IBI (eg, university education and being married were associated with shorter IBI), whereas income stress was associated with longer first IBI but not with second IBI.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding maternal factors associated with birth intervals in a high-income country like Australia may enable more nuanced tailoring of guidelines for prepregnancy care.

摘要

背景与目的

连续分娩之间的短间隔和长间隔与不良分娩结局有关,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家,但高收入国家的分娩间隔仍相对研究不足。本研究旨在探讨澳大利亚母婴因素与分娩间隔的关系。

方法

本研究样本来自澳大利亚妇女健康纵向研究,共纳入 1973-1978 年出生、生育两次及以上且在 1996 年至 2018 年期间定期参加调查的 6130 名参与者。将产次间隔(interbirth interval,IBI)定义为连续活产之间的时间。采用加速失效时间模型来研究母婴因素与 IBI 的关系。

结果

对于仅有两次分娩的女性(n=3802),第二次分娩的中位时间为 34.0 个月(IQR 23.1,46.2),较短的 IBI 与较高的社会经济地位相关(如,大学教育(31.9 个月),较低的收入压力(31.1)),而较长的 IBI 与年龄超过 35 岁(39.7)、健康状况一般/较差(43.0)、未经治疗的生育问题(45.5)、流产(39.4)或堕胎(41.0)相关。对于生育三次及以上的女性(n=2328),第二次和第三次分娩的中位时间分别为 31.2 个月(19.9,42.1)和 36.5 个月(25.3,50.1);一些因素在首次 IBI 和第二次 IBI 之间具有一致性(如,大学教育和已婚与较短的 IBI 相关),而收入压力与较长的首次 IBI 相关,但与第二次 IBI 无关。

结论

了解像澳大利亚这样的高收入国家母婴因素与分娩间隔的关系,可能有助于更细致地调整孕前保健指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c59e/9790452/f7a203e318eb/BIRT-49-728-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c59e/9790452/e64ecceee04a/BIRT-49-728-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c59e/9790452/f7a203e318eb/BIRT-49-728-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c59e/9790452/e64ecceee04a/BIRT-49-728-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c59e/9790452/f7a203e318eb/BIRT-49-728-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Maternal factors associated with interbirth intervals in Australia: Results from a population-based longitudinal study.与澳大利亚出生间隔相关的产妇因素:一项基于人群的纵向研究结果。
Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):728-740. doi: 10.1111/birt.12638. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
2
Population policies and reproductive patterns in Vietnam.越南的人口政策与生育模式
Lancet. 1996 Jun 1;347(9014):1529-32. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90676-5.
3
Socioeconomic Position and Reproduction: Findings from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.社会经济地位与生育:澳大利亚女性健康纵向研究的结果
Matern Child Health J. 2018 Dec;22(12):1713-1724. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-2567-1.
4
Emerging patterns of child-spacing in Canada.加拿大生育间隔的新趋势。
J Biosoc Sci. 1993 Apr;25(2):155-67. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000020460.
5
Interpregnancy and interbirth intervals and all-cause, cardiovascular-related and cancer-related maternal mortality: findings from a large population-based cohort study.妊娠间隔和出生间隔与全因、心血管相关和癌症相关的孕产妇死亡:来自一项大型基于人群的队列研究的结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Nov;74(11):957-963. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214242. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
6
Birth order, interpregnancy interval and birth outcomes among Filipino infants.菲律宾婴儿的出生顺序、妊娠间隔与出生结局
J Biosoc Sci. 1994 Apr;26(2):243-59. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000021271.
7
Effects of the status of women on the first-birth interval in Indian urban society.印度城市社会中女性状况对首次生育间隔的影响。
J Biosoc Sci. 1999 Jan;31(1):55-69. doi: 10.1017/s0021932099000553.
8
[Birth interval differentials in Rwanda].[卢旺达的生育间隔差异]
Cah Que Demogr. 1992 Spring;21(1):67-98.
9
Exploring the association between short/long preceding birth intervals and child mortality: using reference birth interval children of the same mother as comparison.探索前后出生间隔长短与儿童死亡率之间的关联:以同一母亲的参照出生间隔儿童作为对照
BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S6. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
10
Delayed childbearing in contemporary Spain: trends and differentials.当代西班牙的晚育现象:趋势与差异
Eur J Popul. 1992;8(3):217-46. doi: 10.1007/BF01797211.

本文引用的文献

1
Interpregnancy intervals and adverse birth outcomes in high-income countries: An international cohort study.高收入国家的妊娠间隔与不良出生结局:一项国际队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 19;16(7):e0255000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255000. eCollection 2021.
2
Factors associated with short birth interval in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.与中低收入国家短生育间隔相关的因素:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2852-z.
3
Association between interpregnancy interval and subsequent stillbirth in 58 low-income and middle-income countries: a retrospective analysis using Demographic and Health Surveys.
58 个低收入和中等收入国家的妊娠间隔与随后死胎之间的关联:使用人口与健康调查进行的回顾性分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jan;8(1):e113-e122. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30458-9.
4
Suboptimal child spacing practice and its associated factors among women of child bearing age in Serbo town, JIMMA zone, Southwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西南部吉马地区塞尔博镇育龄妇女中不理想的生育间隔做法及其相关因素。
Contracept Reprod Med. 2019 May 6;4:4. doi: 10.1186/s40834-019-0085-1. eCollection 2019.
5
Developing evidence-based recommendations for optimal interpregnancy intervals in high-income countries: protocol for an international cohort study.制定高收入国家最佳产后间隔的循证建议:一项国际队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):e027941. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027941.
6
Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings: An updated systematic review.高资源环境下的短妊娠间隔与不良围产期结局:一项更新的系统评价。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;33(1):O25-O47. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12503. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
7
Interpregnancy Intervals in a Contemporary Manitoba Cohort: Prevalence of So-Called Suboptimal Intervals and Associated Maternal Characteristics.当代曼尼托巴队列中的妊娠间隔:所谓次优间隔的患病率及相关产妇特征
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Aug;40(8):1024-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.12.001.
8
The Impact of Computing Interpregnancy Intervals Without Accounting for Intervening Pregnancy Events.不考虑中间妊娠事件计算妊娠间隔的影响。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;32(2):141-148. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12458. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
9
Interpregnancy Interval and Pregnancy Outcomes: Causal or Not?妊娠间隔与妊娠结局:是否存在因果关系?
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;129(3):405-407. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001913.
10
Short Interpregnancy Intervals: An Evidence-Based Guide for Clinicians.短间隔妊娠:临床医生的循证指南。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2015 Jul;70(7):458-64. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000195.