• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Cost Effectiveness of Routine Histopathologic Femoral Head Analysis in Hip Arthroplasty.髋关节置换术中常规股骨头组织病理学分析的成本效益评估
Hip Pelvis. 2022 Mar;34(1):56-61. doi: 10.5371/hp.2022.34.1.56. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
2
Unsuspected Malignancies in Routine Femoral Head Histopathologic Examination During Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.初次全髋关节置换术中股骨头常规组织病理学检查中未被怀疑的恶性肿瘤:成本效益分析
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):735-742. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.017. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
3
Cost Analysis of Routine Histopathologic Evaluation of Specimens Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty.全踝关节置换术后常规组织病理评估标本的成本分析。
Foot Ankle Int. 2024 Oct;45(10):1139-1144. doi: 10.1177/10711007241262999. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
4
Selective pathological examination following hip arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study.髋关节置换术后的选择性病理检查:一项回顾性队列研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Apr;108(2):102942. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102942. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
5
Cost and effectiveness of routine pathological examination of operative specimens obtained during primary total hip and knee replacement in patients with osteoarthritis.骨关节炎患者初次全髋关节和膝关节置换术中获取的手术标本进行常规病理检查的成本与效益
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Nov;82(11):1531-5. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200011000-00002.
6
Cost-benefit analysis of routine pathology examination in primary shoulder arthroplasty.初次肩关节置换术中常规病理检查的成本效益分析
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Apr;26(4):674-678. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.028. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
7
Is There Value in Pathology Specimens in Routine Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?常规全髋关节和膝关节置换术中病理标本有价值吗?
Cureus. 2021 Jan 30;13(1):e13005. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13005.
8
Routine Pathologic Examination of Femoral Head Specimens from Total Hip Arthroplasty May Not Be Indicated or Cost-effective: A Systematic Review.全髋关节置换术股骨头标本的常规病理检查可能并无必要或不具成本效益:一项系统评价
Arthroplast Today. 2022 May 9;15:182-187.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.016. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Analysis of routine histological evaluation of tissues removed during primary hip and knee arthroplasty.初次髋关节和膝关节置换术中切除组织的常规组织学评估分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jul;81(7):926-31. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199907000-00004.
10
Histologic examinations of arthroplasty specimens are not cost-effective: a retrospective cohort study.关节置换标本的组织学检查不具有成本效益:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 May;470(5):1452-60. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2149-7. Epub 2011 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Routine histopathological examination of femoral heads and incidental metastatic bone disease in hip arthroplasty.股骨头的常规组织病理学检查及髋关节置换术中偶然发现的骨转移疾病
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2025 Mar 17;59(1):58-62. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2025.24021.

本文引用的文献

1
Routine histopathological examination of gallbladder specimens after cholecystectomy: Is it time to change the current practice?胆囊切除术后胆囊标本的常规组织病理学检查:是时候改变当前的做法了吗?
Turk J Surg. 2018 Sep 11;35(2):86-90. doi: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4126. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
Pathology Assessment of Femoral Head Resection Specimens: An Important Quality Assurance Procedure.股骨头切除标本的病理学评估:一项重要的质量保证程序。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 May;144(5):580-585. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0128-OA. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
3
Cost-effectiveness versus Cost-Utility Analyses: What Are the Motives Behind Using Each and How Do Their Results Differ?-A Polish Example.成本效益分析与成本效用分析:使用每种分析方法的动机是什么以及它们的结果有何不同?——以波兰为例
Value Health Reg Issues. 2014 Sep;4:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
4
Unsuspected Malignancies in Routine Femoral Head Histopathologic Examination During Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.初次全髋关节置换术中股骨头常规组织病理学检查中未被怀疑的恶性肿瘤:成本效益分析
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):735-742. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.017. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
The Pathologist Workforce in the United States: II. An Interactive Modeling Tool for Analyzing Future Qualitative and Quantitative Staffing Demands for Services.美国病理学家劳动力:II. 用于分析未来服务定性和定量人员配置需求的交互式建模工具。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Nov;139(11):1413-30. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0559-OA.
6
Thresholds for the cost-effectiveness of interventions: alternative approaches.干预措施成本效益的阈值:替代方法
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Feb 1;93(2):118-24. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.138206. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
7
Unexpected finding in a femoral head specimen after elective total hip arthroplasty.
Pathol Int. 2014 Nov;64(11):585-7. doi: 10.1111/pin.12210. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
8
Hernia sacs: is histological examination necessary?疝囊:是否有必要进行组织学检查?
J Clin Pathol. 2013 Dec;66(12):1084-6. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201734. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
9
Histopathology of femoral head donations: a retrospective review of 6161 cases.股骨头捐献的组织病理学:6161 例回顾性研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Aug 17;93(16):1500-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00133.
10
Histologic examinations of arthroplasty specimens are not cost-effective: a retrospective cohort study.关节置换标本的组织学检查不具有成本效益:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 May;470(5):1452-60. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2149-7. Epub 2011 Nov 5.

髋关节置换术中常规股骨头组织病理学分析的成本效益评估

Evaluation of the Cost Effectiveness of Routine Histopathologic Femoral Head Analysis in Hip Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Brown Zoe, Perry Michael, Killen Cameron, Schmitt Daniel, Wesolowski Michael, Brown Nicholas M

机构信息

Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

Hip Pelvis. 2022 Mar;34(1):56-61. doi: 10.5371/hp.2022.34.1.56. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

DOI:10.5371/hp.2022.34.1.56
PMID:35355630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8931949/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Histopathologic analysis of femoral head specimens following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a routine practice that represents a significant use of health care resources. However, it occasionally results in discovery of undiagnosed hematopoietic malignancy and other discrepant diagnoses such as avascular necrosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of discordant and discrepant diagnoses discovered from routine histopathological evaluation of femoral heads following THA and perform a cost analysis of this practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of patients undergoing primary THA between 2004-2017 was conducted. A comparison of the surgeon's preoperative and postoperative diagnosis, and the histopathologic diagnosis was performed. In cases where the clinical and histopathology differed, a review determined whether this resulted in a change in clinical management. Medicare reimbursement and previously published cost data corrected for inflation were utilized for cost calculations.

RESULTS

A review of 2,134 procedures was performed. The pathologic diagnosis matched the postoperative diagnosis in 96.0% of cases. Eighty-three cases (4.0%) had a discrepant diagnosis where treatment was not substantially altered. There was one case of discordant diagnosis where lymphoma was diagnosed and subsequently treated. The cost per discrepant diagnosis was $141,880 and per discordant diagnosis was $1,669 when using 100% Medicare reimbursement and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code combination 88304+88311.

CONCLUSION

Histopathologic analysis of femoral head specimens in THAs showed an association with high costs given the rarity of discordant diagnoses. Routine use of the practice should be at the discretion of individual hospitals with consideration for cost and utility thresholds.

摘要

目的

全髋关节置换术(THA)后股骨头标本的组织病理学分析是一种常规操作,这代表了医疗保健资源的大量使用。然而,它偶尔会导致发现未被诊断的造血系统恶性肿瘤以及其他不一致的诊断,如缺血性坏死。本研究的目的是确定THA后股骨头常规组织病理学评估中发现的不一致和差异诊断的发生率,并对这种操作进行成本分析。

材料与方法

对2004年至2017年间接受初次THA的患者进行回顾。比较外科医生的术前和术后诊断以及组织病理学诊断。在临床和组织病理学不同的情况下,进行回顾以确定这是否导致临床管理的改变。使用医疗保险报销和先前公布的经通胀校正的成本数据进行成本计算。

结果

对2134例手术进行了回顾。96.0%的病例中病理诊断与术后诊断相符。83例(4.0%)有差异诊断,但治疗未发生实质性改变。有1例不一致诊断,诊断为淋巴瘤并随后进行了治疗。当使用100%医疗保险报销和现行程序术语(CPT)代码组合88304 + 88311时,每个差异诊断的成本为141,880美元,每个不一致诊断的成本为1,669美元。

结论

鉴于不一致诊断的罕见性,THA中股骨头标本的组织病理学分析显示出与高成本相关。该操作的常规使用应由各医院自行决定,并考虑成本和效用阈值。